UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
Commission File Number:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
| ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| ||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip code) |
( (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
|
|
Yes | No | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
|
|
|
|
Yes | No | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
| Accelerated Filer | o |
| Non-accelerated Filer | o |
| Smaller Reporting Company |
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended the extended transition period for complying with a new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
| ||
Yes | o | No |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
| |
Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol | Name of Each Exchange on which Registered | Amount | Date | |
|
|
|
|
| |
March 31, 2020 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Index
|
|
|
|
| Page No. |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
| |
March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 3 |
|
|
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 | 4 |
|
|
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 | 5 |
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity- |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 | 6 |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 22 |
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 33 |
|
|
34 | |
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
34 | |
|
|
34 | |
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 34 |
|
|
34 | |
|
|
34 | |
|
|
35 | |
|
|
36 | |
|
|
EX – 31.1 |
|
EX – 31.2 |
|
EX – 31.3 |
|
EX – 32.1 |
|
EX – 32.2 |
|
EX – 32.3 EX – 101 EX – 104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1. Financial Statements | |||||
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| March 31, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 | ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | |
| $ | |
Accounts receivable less allowances of $ |
| |
|
| |
Inventories |
| |
|
| |
Prepaid income taxes |
| |
|
| |
Prepaid expenses |
| |
|
| |
Total current assets |
| |
|
| |
Investments of deferred compensation plans |
| |
|
| |
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $ |
| |
|
| |
Lease right of use asset |
| |
|
| |
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $ |
| |
|
| |
Goodwill |
| |
|
| |
Other assets |
| |
|
| |
Total Assets | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable | $ | |
| $ | |
Accrued insurance |
| |
|
| |
Accrued compensation |
| |
|
| |
Accrued legal |
| |
|
| |
Short-term lease liability |
| |
|
| |
Other current liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Total current liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Deferred income taxes |
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt |
| |
|
| |
Deferred compensation liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Long-term lease liability |
| |
|
| |
Other liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Total Liabilities |
| |
|
| |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
| ||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock - authorized |
| |
|
| |
Paid-in capital |
| |
|
| |
Retained earnings |
| |
|
| |
Treasury stock - |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock |
| |
|
| |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
| |
|
| |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | |||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Service revenues and sales | $ | |
| $ | |
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation) |
| |
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| |
|
| |
Depreciation |
| |
|
| |
Amortization |
| |
|
| |
Other operating expenses |
| |
|
| |
Total costs and expenses |
| |
|
| |
Income from operations |
| |
|
| |
Interest expense |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Other (expense)/income - net |
| ( |
|
| |
Income before income taxes |
| |
|
| |
Income taxes |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net income | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income | $ | |
| $ | |
Average number of shares outstanding |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income | $ | |
| $ | |
Average number of shares outstanding |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Share | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |||||
(in thousands) | |||||
|
| ||||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income | $ | |
| $ | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided |
|
|
|
|
|
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
| |
|
| |
Stock option expense |
| |
|
| |
Provision/(benefit) for deferred income taxes |
| |
|
| ( |
Noncash long-term incentive compensation |
| |
|
| |
Provision for bad debts |
| |
|
| - |
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
| |
|
| |
Litigation settlement |
| - |
|
| |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable |
| |
|
| ( |
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
| |
|
| ( |
Decrease in prepaid expenses |
| |
|
| |
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities |
| ( |
|
| |
Change in current income taxes |
| |
|
| |
Net change in lease assets and liabilities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Decrease/(increase) in other assets |
| |
|
| ( |
(Decrease)/increase in other liabilities |
| ( |
|
| |
Other sources |
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Business combinations |
| ( |
|
| - |
Other uses |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net cash used by investing activities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving line of credit |
| |
|
| |
Payments on revolving line of credit |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Purchases of treasury stock |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Change in cash overdrafts payable |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
| |
|
| |
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Dividends paid |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Other (uses)/sources |
| ( |
|
| |
Net cash used by financing activities |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||||||||||||||
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treasury |
|
| Payable in |
|
|
|
|
| Capital |
|
| Paid-in |
|
| Retained |
|
| Stock- |
|
| Company |
|
|
|
|
| Stock |
|
| Capital |
|
| Earnings |
|
| at Cost |
|
| Stock |
|
| Total |
Balance at December 31, 2019 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ( |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| |
Dividends paid ($ |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
Stock awards and exercise of stock options |
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| |
Purchases of treasury stock |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
Other |
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
|
| |
|
| ( |
Balance at March 31, 2020 | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | ( |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Treasury |
|
| Payable in |
|
|
|
|
| Capital |
|
| Paid-in |
|
| Retained |
|
| Stock- |
|
| Company |
|
|
|
|
| Stock |
|
| Capital |
|
| Earnings |
|
| at Cost |
|
| Stock |
|
| Total |
Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ( |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| |
Dividends paid ($ |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
Stock awards and exercise of stock options |
| |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| |
Purchases of treasury stock |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
Other |
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
|
| ( |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at March 31, 2019 | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | ( |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of these statements. |
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chemed in accordance with Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X. Consequently, we have omitted certain disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The December 31, 2019 balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. However, in our opinion, the financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to current presentation.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments, Credit Losses. The ASU introduces the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. The CECL methodology utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for financial assets at the time the asset is originated or acquired. This generally results in earlier recognition of credit losses and greater transparency about credit risk. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective method. The provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 did not significantly impact the method or timing that the Company recognizes expected credit losses and the cumulative effect of adoption was immaterial.
The Company’s only material financial asset subject to ASU No. 2016-13 is accounts receivable, trade and other. The Company recognizes an allowance for credit losses related to accounts receivable to present the net amount expected to be collected as of the balance sheet date. Accounts receivable are written-off when it is determined that the amount is deemed uncollectible. The following presents a detailed discussion of the operating subsidiaries’ accounts receivable and their evaluation of credit risk related to those accounts:
Roto-Rooter’s trade accounts receivable are comprised mainly of amounts due from commercial entities and commercial insurance carriers. Roto-Rooter’s accounts receivable are generally outstanding for 90 days or less and there are no significant amounts outstanding greater than one year. Roto-Rooter historically has not experienced significant write-offs due to credit losses. For amounts due from commercial entities, Roto-Rooter utilizes a provision matrix based on historical credit losses by aging category. For amounts due from commercial insurance carriers, mainly from water restoration revenue, Roto-Rooter periodically reviews published default tables related to commercial insurance carriers and provides an allowance. As further discussed below, Roto-Rooter assesses on a quarterly basis whether the historical rates used are expected to be representative of credit risk over the life of the account taking into consideration existing economic conditions.
In excess of 90% of VITAS’ accounts receivable are from the Federal or state governments under Medicare and Medicaid. VITAS believes that it is reasonable to expect that the risk of non-payment as a result of credit issues from these government entities is zero. As such, there is no allowance for credit losses established related to these accounts. The remainder of VITAS’ accounts are from commercial insurance carriers. VITAS’ accounts are generally outstanding for 90 days or less and there are no significant amounts outstanding greater than one year. VITAS historically has not experienced significant write-offs due to credit losses. VITAS periodically reviews published default tables related to commercial insurance carriers and provides an allowance. VITAS assesses on a quarterly basis whether these default rates are expected to be representative of credit risk over the life of the account taking into consideration existing economic conditions.
As further discussed in footnote 5, Chemed has $
In conjunction with its first quarter of 2020 closing process, subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, Roto-Rooter re-assessed its expected credit losses as a result of COVID-19. In addition to the historical provision matrix described above, and in conjunction with the quarterly assessment of current economic conditions and published default rates to evaluate credit risk over the life of the account, Roto-Rooter analyzed the industries from which the accounts receivable originated. Using available information and judgement, additional expected credit losses were recorded for industries deemed higher risk during the economic shut down, such as
restaurants, hotels and bars. The additional charge taken for the three-month period ended March 31, 2020 related to expected credit losses from COVID-19 issues was $
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ADDITIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| (CHARGED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CREDITED |
|
| (CHARGED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BALANCE AT |
|
| TO COSTS |
|
| CREDITED |
|
|
|
|
| BALANCE |
|
| BEGINNING |
|
| AND |
|
| TO OTHER |
|
|
|
|
| AT END |
DESCRIPTION |
| OF PERIOD |
|
| EXPENSES |
|
| ACCOUNTS |
|
| OTHER |
|
| OF PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020 | $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
| $ | ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recent COVID-19 pandemic did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flow and financial position as of and for the three months-ended March 31, 2020. We are closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of our business including impacts to employees, customers, patients, suppliers and vendors. The Company’s two operating subsidiaries have been categorized as critical infrastructure businesses and are not currently materially limited by federal, state or local regulations that restrict movement or operating ability.
The length and severity of the pandemic, coupled with related governmental actions including relief acts and actions relating to our workforce at federal, state and local levels, and underlying economic disruption will determine the ultimate short-term and long-term impact to our business operations and financial results. We are unable to predict the myriad of possible issues that could arise or the ultimate effect to our businesses as a result of the unknown short, medium and long-term impacts that the pandemic will have on the United States economy and society as a whole.
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was passed. It is intended to provide economic relief to individuals and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. It also contains provisions related to healthcare providers’ operations and the issues caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The following significant economic impacts for Chemed and its subsidiaries as a result of specific provisions of the CARES Act:
Chemed deferred its first quarter 2020 income tax payment of $
A portion of the CARES Act provides $
During the period from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-02 Leases” which introduced a lessee model that brings most leases onto the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard. This standard is also referred to as Accountings Standards Codification No.842 (“ASC 842”). We adopted ASC 842 effective January 1, 2019, using the optional transition method requiring leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 to be recognized and measured. The transition method selected does not require adjustments to prior period amounts, which continue to be reflected in accordance with historical accounting. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification.
Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for inpatient units (“IPUs”) and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter mainly has leased office space.
Roto-Rooter purchases equipment and leases it to certain of its independent contractors. We analyzed these leases in accordance with ASC 842 and determined they are operating leases. As a result, Roto-Rooter will continue to capitalize the equipment underlying these leases, depreciate the equipment and recognize rental income.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in right of use assets and lease liabilities of $
On January 1, 2019, we early adopted ASU No. 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract”. This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal use software. We adopted the ASU on a prospective basis.
As of March 31, 2020, we have
In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2018-07 – Compensation – Stock Compensation”. The ASU expands the scope of current guidance to include all share-based payment arrangements related to the acquisition of goods and services from both non-employees and employees. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the Company in all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Adoption of this standard had no material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our effective income tax rate was
Included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are $
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard and subsequent amendments are theoretically intended to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide for more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements and simplify the preparation of financial statements. The standard is also referred to as Accounting Standards Codification No. 606 (“ASC 606”). We adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. The required disclosures of ASC 606 and impact of adoption are discussed below for each of our operating subsidiaries.
VITAS
Service revenue for VITAS is reported at the amount that reflects the ultimate consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from third-party payors, primarily commercial health insurers and government programs (Medicare and Medicaid), and include variable consideration for revenue adjustments due to settlements of audits and reviews, as well as certain hospice-specific revenue capitations. Amounts are generally billed monthly or subsequent to patient discharge. Subsequent changes in the transaction price initially recognized are not significant.
Hospice services are provided on a daily basis and the type of service provided is determined based on a physician’s determination of each patient’s specific needs on that given day. Reimbursement rates for hospice services are on a per diem basis regardless of the type of service provided or the payor. Reimbursement rates from government programs are established by the appropriate governmental agency and are standard across all hospice providers. Reimbursement rates from health insurers are negotiated with each payor and generally structured to closely mirror the Medicare reimbursement model. The types of hospice services provided and associated reimbursement model for each are as follows:
Routine Home Care occurs when a patient receives hospice care in their home, including a nursing home setting. The routine home care rate is paid for each day that a patient is in a hospice program and is not receiving one of the other categories of hospice care. For Medicare patients, the routine home care rate reflects a two-tiered rate, with a higher rate for the first
General Inpatient Care occurs when a patient requires services in a controlled setting for a short period of time for pain control or symptom management which cannot be managed in other settings. General inpatient care services must be provided in a Medicare or Medicaid certified hospital or long-term care facility or at a freestanding inpatient hospice facility with the required registered nurse staffing.
Continuous Home Care is provided to patients while at home, including a nursing home setting, during periods of crisis when intensive monitoring and care, primarily nursing care, is required in order to achieve palliation or management of acute medical symptoms. Continuous home care requires a minimum of
Respite Care permits a hospice patient to receive services on an inpatient basis for a short period of time in order to provide relief for the patient’s family or other caregivers from the demands of caring for the patient. A hospice can receive payment for respite care for a given patient for up to five consecutive days at a time, after which respite care is reimbursed at the routine home care rate.
Each level of care represents a separate promise under the contract of care and is provided independently for each patient contingent upon the patient’s specific medical needs as determined by a physician. However, the clinical criteria used to determine a patient’s level of care is consistent across all patients, given that, each patient is subject to the same payor rules and regulations. As a result, we have concluded that each level of care is capable of being distinct and is distinct in the context of the contract. Furthermore, we have determined that each level of care represents a stand ready service provided as a series of either days or hours of patient care. We believe that the performance obligations for each level of care meet criteria to be satisfied over time. VITAS recognizes revenue based on the service output. VITAS believes this to be the most faithful depiction of the transfer of control of services as the patient simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance. Revenue is recognized on a daily or hourly basis for each patient in accordance with the reimbursement model for each type of service. VITAS’ performance obligations relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than one year. Therefore, VITAS has elected to apply the optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or
partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations referred to above relate to bereavement services provided to patients’ families for at least
Care is provided to patients regardless of their ability to pay. Patients who meet our criteria for charity care are provided care without charge. There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements related to charity care. The cost of providing charity care during the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $
Generally, patients who are covered by third-party payors are responsible for related deductibles and coinsurance which vary in amount. VITAS also provides service to patients without a reimbursement source and may offer those patients discounts from standard charges. VITAS estimates the transaction price for patients with deductibles and coinsurance, along with those uninsured patients, based on historical experience and current conditions. The estimate of any contractual adjustments, discounts or implicit price concessions reduces the amount of revenue initially recognized. Subsequent changes to the estimate of the transaction price are recorded as adjustments to patient service revenue in the period of change. Subsequent changes that are determined to be the result of an adverse change in the patients’ ability to pay (i.e. change in credit risk) are recorded as bad debt expense. VITAS has no material adjustments related to subsequent changes in the estimate of the transaction price or subsequent changes as the result of an adverse change in the patient’s ability to pay for any period reported.
Laws and regulations concerning government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, are complex and subject to varying interpretation. Medicare and Medicaid programs have broad authority to audit and review compliance with such laws and regulations, and impose payment suspensions when merited. Additionally, the contracts we have with commercial health insurance payors provide for retroactive audit and review of claims. Settlement with third party payors for retroactive adjustments due to audits, reviews or investigations are considered variable consideration and are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing patient care. The variable consideration is estimated based on the terms of the payment agreement, existing correspondence from the payor and our historical settlement activity. These estimates are adjusted in future periods, as new information becomes available.
We are subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services which are considered variable consideration, as follows:
Inpatient Cap. If the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds
Medicare Cap. We are also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (“Medicare cap”). Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider election. The “streamlined” method compares total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of the following year. At March 31, 2020, all our programs except one are using the “streamlined” method.
The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period. The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether revenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap. Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective actions, which include changes to the patient mix and increased patient admissions. However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate revenue recognized during the government fiscal year that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record an adjustment to revenue of an amount equal to a ratable portion of our best estimate for the year.
In 2013, the U.S. government implemented automatic budget reductions of
did not occur. As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third-party intermediary that an additional $
During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, we recorded $
During the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we recorded $
For VITAS’ patients in the nursing home setting in which Medicaid pays the nursing home room and board, VITAS serves as a pass-through between Medicaid and the nursing home. We are responsible for paying the nursing home for that patient’s room and board. Medicaid reimburses us for
The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Medicare |
| Medicaid |
| Commercial |
| Total | ||||
Routine home care | $ | |
| $ | |
|
| |
| $ | |
Continuous care |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Inpatient care |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
Medicare cap adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Implicit price concessions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Room and board, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Medicare |
| Medicaid |
| Commercial |
| Total | ||||
Routine home care | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Continuous care |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Inpatient care |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
Medicare cap adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Implicit price concessions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Room and board, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( |
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
Roto-Rooter
Roto-Rooter provides plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers primarily in the United States. Services are provided through a network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees. Service revenue for Roto-Rooter is reported at the amount that reflects the ultimate consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing services.
Roto-Rooter owns and operates branches focusing mainly on large population centers in the United States. Roto-Rooter’s primary lines of business in company-owned branches consist of plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, excavation and water restoration. For purposes of ASC 606 analysis, plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, and excavation have been combined into one portfolio and are
referred to as “short-term core services”. Water restoration is analyzed as a separate portfolio. The following describes the key characteristics of these portfolios:
Short-term Core Services are plumbing, drain and sewer cleaning and excavation services. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category range from a few hours to a few days. There are no significant warranty costs or on-going obligations to the customer once a service has been completed. For residential customers, payment is received at the time of job completion before the Roto-Rooter technician leaves the residence. Commercial customers may be granted credit subject to internally designated authority limits and credit check guidelines. If credit is granted, payment terms are generally
Each job in this category is a distinct service with a distinct performance obligation to the customer. Revenue is recognized at the completion of each job. Variable consideration consists of pre-invoice discounts and post-invoice discounts. Pre-invoice discounts are given in the form of coupons or price concessions. Post-invoice discounts consist of credit memos generally granted to resolve customer service issues. Variable consideration is estimated based on historical activity and recorded at the time service is completed.
Water Restoration Services involve the remediation of water and humidity after a flood. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category generally ranges from
For both short-term core services and water restoration services, Roto-Rooter satisfies its performance obligation at a point in time. The services provided generally involve fixing plumbing, drainage or flood-related issues at the customer’s property. At the time service is complete, the customer acknowledges its obligation to pay for service and its satisfaction with the service performed. This provides evidence that the customer has accepted the service and Roto-Rooter is now entitled to payment. As such, Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue for these services upon completion of the job and receipt of customer acknowledgement. Roto-Rooter’s performance obligations for short-term core services and water restoration services relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than a year. Therefore, Roto-Rooter has elected to apply the optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. Roto-Rooter does not have significant unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations at the time of initial revenue recognition for short-term core or water restoration services.
Roto-Rooter owns the rights to certain territories and contracts with independent third-parties to operate the territory under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Such contracts are for a specified term but cancellable by either party without penalty with
Independent contractors pay Roto-Rooter a standard fee calculated as a percentage of their cash collection from weekly sales. The primary value for the independent contractors under these arrangements is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from independent contractors over-time (weekly) as the independent contractor’s labor sales are completed and payment from customers are received. Payment from independent contractors is also received on a weekly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the independent contractor as a result of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand. Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. There is no significant variable consideration related to these arrangements.
Roto-Rooter has licensed the rights to operate under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks in other territories to franchisees. Each such contract is for a
Franchisees pay Roto-Rooter a standard monthly fee based on the population within the franchise territory. The standard fee is revised on a yearly basis based on changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The primary value for the franchisees under this arrangement is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from franchisees over-time (monthly). Payment from franchisees is also received on a monthly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the franchisees as a result of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand.
Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. There is no significant variable consideration related to these arrangements.
The composition of disaggregated revenue for the first quarter is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
| March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Short-term core service jobs | $ | |
| $ | |
Water restoration |
| |
|
| |
Contractor revenue |
| |
|
| |
Franchise fees |
| |
|
| |
All other |
| |
|
| |
Subtotal | $ | |
| $ | |
Implicit price concessions and credit memos |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net revenue | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales by business segment are shown in Footnote 2. After-tax earnings by business segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
After-tax Income/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS | $ | |
| $ | |
Roto-Rooter |
| |
|
| |
Total |
| |
|
| |
Corporate |
| ( |
|
| ( |
Net income | $ | |
| $ | |
We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.
Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding. Earnings and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Income | |||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
| Income |
| Shares |
| Earnings per Share | |||
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Earnings |
| $ | |
| |
| $ | |
| Dilutive stock options |
|
| - |
| |
|
|
|
| Nonvested stock awards |
|
| - |
| |
|
|
|
| Diluted earnings |
| $ | |
| |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Earnings |
| $ | |
| |
| $ | |
| Dilutive stock options |
|
| - |
| |
|
|
|
| Nonvested stock awards |
|
| - |
| |
|
|
|
| Diluted earnings |
| $ | |
| |
| $ | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, there were
For the three months ended March 31, 2019, there were
On June 20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2018 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement consist of a
Debt issuance costs associated with the prior credit agreement were not written off as the lenders and their relative percentages participation in the facility did not change. With respect to the 2018 Credit Agreement, deferred financing costs were $
The 2018 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants effective as of March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
| Requirement |
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated Adj. EBITDA) |
| < |
|
|
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges) |
| > |
|
|
|
We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2020. We have issued $
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | $ | |
| $ | |
Litigation settlement |
| - |
|
| |
Total other operating expenses | $ | |
| $ | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company recorded $
Other (expense)/income – net comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Market value adjustment on assets held in |
|
|
|
| |
deferred compensation trust | $ | ( |
| $ | |
Interest income |
| |
|
| |
Total other (expense)/income - net | $ | ( |
| $ | |
Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for IPUs and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter has leased office space. Our leases have remaining terms of under
We do not currently have any finance leases, therefore all lease information disclosed is related to operating leases.
The components of balance sheet information related to leases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease assets | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Current operating leases |
| |
|
| |
Noncurrent operating leases |
| |
|
| |
Total operating lease liabilities | $ | |
| $ | |
The components of lease expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Lease Expense (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease expense | $ | |
| $ | |
Sublease income |
| - |
|
| ( |
Net lease expense | $ | |
| $ | |
(a)
The components of cash flow information related to leases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from leases | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term at March 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
Operating leases |
| years |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate at March 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
Operating leases |
| % |
|
|
|
Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2020 | $ | |
2021 |
| |
2022 |
| |
2023 |
| |
2024 |
| |
Thereafter |
| |
Total lease payments | $ | |
Less: interest |
| ( |
Less: future lease obligations not yet commenced |
| ( |
Total liability recognized on the balance sheet | $ | |
For leases commencing prior to April 2019, minimum rental payments exclude payments to landlords for real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Operating lease payments include $
On February 21, 2020, the Compensation/Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors (“CIC”) granted
On February 21, 2020, the CIC also granted
All of the Company’s plans that provide retirement and similar benefits are defined contribution plans. These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Net (losses)/gains for the Company’s retirement and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, | ||||
2020 |
| 2019 | ||
$ | ( |
| $ | |
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, which can result in penalties including repayment obligations, funding withholding, or debarment, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. Other than as described below, it is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.
Regulatory Matters and Litigation
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve civil litigation under the False Claims Act brought by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and various relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Missouri. The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to settlement without admission of wrongdoing.
In connection with the settlement VITAS and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate integrity agreement (“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a term of five years during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review Organization to perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the event of breach of the CIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of stipulated penalties or could be excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs.
The Company entered into a settlement agreement in March 2019 that will resolve state-wide wage and hour class action claims raised in four separate cases: (1) Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 (“Seper”); (2) Jiwan Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL (“Chhina”) (which was subsequently merged with Seper); (3) Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755 (“Phillips and Moore”); and (4) Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 17853886 (“Williams”). These actions were brought by both current and former employees including a registered nurse, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), home health aides and a social worker. Each action stated multiple claims generally including (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. The
cases generally asserted claims on behalf of classes defined to include all current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of each lawsuit. For additional procedural history of these cases, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.
The Seper and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the filing of amended complaint on August 28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper were identified as named plaintiffs. Discovery in the remaining cases was stayed as to class claims and each court was advised of the pendency of the consolidated Seper/Chhina action. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The settlement amount of $
Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in RRSC’s Menlo Park branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging (1) failure to provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to properly pay for all hours worked; (3) failure to provide accurate wage statements; (4) failure to reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unfair business practices. Lax stated these claims as a representative of a class defined as all service technicians employed by RRSC in California during the
The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of these lawsuits at this time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore and the class claims in Williams.
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in the Lax lawsuit. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, withholding of governmental funding, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, approximately
VITAS has a pharmacy services contract with
There are
From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds with major commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds. The amount invested was not material for each balance sheet date presented.
FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements. Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs. Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions. In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair Value Measure | ||||||
|
| Carrying Value |
|
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
|
| Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|
| Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Mutual fund investments of deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation plans held in trust | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
Total debt |
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair Value Measure | ||||||
|
| Carrying Value |
|
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
|
| Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|
| Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Mutual fund investments of deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation plans held in trust | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
Total debt |
| |
|
| - |
|
| |
|
| - |
We repurchased the following capital stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands) |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Shares repurchased |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average price per share |
| $ | |
| $ | |
In March 2020, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $
In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2020-04 - Reference Rate Reform”. The update provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another rate expected to be discontinued. The update is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 and will apply through December 31, 2022. The interest rate charged on borrowings from our existing revolver is based on LIBOR. The credit agreement includes provisions for modifying the interest rate in the instance that LIBOR is discontinued. As a result, no contract modifications will be required when LIBOR is discontinued.
In December 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2019-12 – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The ASU adds new guidance to simplify accounting for income taxes, changes the accounting for certain income tax transactions and makes minor improvements to the codifications. The ASU is effective for the Company on January 1, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
On August 2, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase substantially all of the assets of HSW RR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HSW”) and certain related assets of its affiliates, for $
On
The acquisitions were made as a continuation of Roto-Rooter’s strategy to re-acquire franchises in large markets in the United States. The allocation for the two acquisitions completed in 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HSW |
| Oakland |
| Total | |||
Goodwill | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Reacquired franchise rights |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Property, plant, and equipment |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Working capital |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Customer relationships |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Non-compete agreements |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Other assets and liabilities - net |
|
|
| |
|
| | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Reacquired franchise rights, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over the period remaining in each individual franchise agreement. The average amortization period for reacquired franchise rights for the acquisitions made in the third quarter of 2019 is
The franchise fee revenue, the valuation of reacquired franchise rights and amortization for the acquired franchises are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annualized |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| Valuation |
| Amortization of |
|
|
| ||
| 2018 Franchise |
| of Reacquired |
| Reacquired |
|
|
| |||
| Revenue |
| Franchise Rights |
| Franchise Rights |
|
|
| |||
HSW | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
Oakland |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Subtotal |
| |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
All other franchise territories |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of reacquired franchise rights comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, | ||||
2020 |
| 2019 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
$ | |
| $ | |
Customer relationships, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over an average amortization period of
Goodwill is assessed for impairment on a yearly basis as of October 1. The primary factor that contributed to the purchase price resulting in the recognition of goodwill is operational efficiencies expected as a result of consolidating stand- alone franchises and Roto-Rooter’s network of nationwide branches. All goodwill recognized is deductible for tax purposes.
The pro forma revenue and earnings of the Company for March 31, 2019, as if all acquisitions made in fiscal 2019 were completed on January 1, 2019, are as follows: (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales | $ | |
Net income | $ | |
Earnings per share | $ | |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | |
Shown below is movement in Goodwill (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Total | |||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Foreign currency adjustments |
|
|
|
| ( |
|
| ( |
Balance at March 31, 2020 | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients’ final days as comfortable as possible. Through its teams of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter’s services are focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.
The following is a summary of the key operating results (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, |
| ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||
Service revenues and sales | $ | 515,798 |
| $ | 462,034 |
|
Net income | $ | 55,891 |
| $ | 44,667 |
|
Diluted EPS | $ | 3.38 |
| $ | 2.70 |
|
Adjusted net income | $ | 60,715 |
| $ | 48,175 |
|
Adjusted diluted EPS | $ | 3.68 |
| $ | 2.92 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 93,029 |
| $ | 74,798 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue |
| 18.0 | % |
| 16.2 | % |
Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue are not measures derived in accordance with US GAAP. We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results and to compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures. Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is presented on pages 32-33.
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 14.6% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 10.1% increase at VITAS. The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven by an increase in all major service lines as well as a result of acquisitions completed in 2019. The increase in service revenues at VITAS is comprised primarily of a 5.9% increase in days-of-care, a geographically weighted average Medicare reimbursement rate increase of approximately 5.0%, and acuity mix shift which then reduced the Medicare rate increase approximately 0.9%. See page 34 for additional VITAS operating metrics.
The recent COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, cash flow and financial position. We are closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of our business including impacts to employees, customers, patients, suppliers and vendors. The Company’s two operating subsidiaries have been categorized as critical infrastructure businesses and are not currently materially limited by federal, state or local regulations that restrict movement or operating ability.
The continued health of our workforce cannot be predicted during the pandemic. Significant shortages of labor could inhibit the ability of both VITAS and Roto-Rooter to perform services. The inability to procure personal-protective equipment, and to protect worker health and customer safety, could negatively impact the health of our workforce. A portion of our workforce is currently working from remote locations on a regular basis which increases both operational and cybersecurity risks.
VITAS is working closely with hospitals, doctors and other healthcare providers. The response of these healthcare providers to the pandemic may limit VITAS’ ability to provide care and may result in fewer referrals. A prolonged or severe economic downturn may significantly impact Roto-Rooter’s service revenue. A significant disruption in the supply chain for critical items needed by either VITAS or Roto-Rooter could inhibit our ability to provide services or significantly increase the cost of providing those services.
The length and severity of the pandemic, coupled with related governmental actions including relief acts and actions relating to our workforce at federal, state and local levels, and underlying economic disruption will determine the ultimate short-term and long-term impact to our business operations and financial results. We are unable to predict the myriad of possible issues that could arise or the ultimate effect to our businesses as a result of the unknown short, medium and long-term impacts that the pandemic will have on the United States economy and society as a whole.
Identified direct costs incurred for the three-months ended March 31, 2020 related to COVID-19 are $1.8 million. These costs are comprised primarily of additional expected credit losses at Roto-Rooter, additional personal protective equipment and sanitizing supplies at both VITAS and Roto-Rooter and paid time-off for employees potentially directly affected by COVID-19. These costs do
not include estimates for lost revenue, operational inefficiencies related to excess utilization of supplies, equipment and field staffing, diversion of existing infrastructure resources to allow for operating during a pandemic, or diversion of management and administrative time to address COVID-19 issues, while continuing to operate both business segments. We anticipate costs during the second quarter of 2020 and the remainder of calendar 2020 to be significantly higher than what were incurred during the first quarter of 2020, given the timing of the onset and spread of the pandemic. Additionally, VITAS implemented a program that awards more than 10,000 frontline employees an additional two weeks of paid time off (“PTO”) in 2020. VITAS estimates the additional PTO to cost approximately $23.2 million, prior to employee benefit and payroll tax costs.
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was passed. It is intended to provide economic relief to individuals and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. It also contains provisions related to healthcare providers’ operations and the issues caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The following significant economic impacts for Chemed and its subsidiaries as a result of specific provisions of the CARES Act:
Chemed deferred its first quarter 2020 income tax payment of $8.8 million to the Federal government until July 15, 2020, as permitted by the CARES Act. In addition, Chemed and its subsidiaries deferred payment of certain employer payroll taxes and certain state tax payments, as permitted by the CARES Act.
A portion of the CARES Act provides $100 billion from the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (“Relief Fund”) to hospitals and other healthcare providers on the front lines of the coronavirus response. Of this $100 billion distribution from the Relief Fund, $30 billion was designated to be automatically distributed to facilities and healthcare providers based upon their 2019 Medicare fee-for-service revenue. On April 10, 2020 VITAS automatically received $80.2 million from the Relief Fund based upon VITAS’s 2019 Medicare fee-for-service Medicare revenue. While specific details of the program have not been announced, recipients of this $30 billion in CARES Act relief are specified to use these funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. The ability of VITAS to retain and utilize the full $80.2 million from the Relief Fund will depend on the magnitude, timing and nature of the economic impact of COVID-19 within VITAS, as well as the guidelines and rules of the Relief Fund program.
During the period from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the 2% sequestration reimbursement cut is suspended. VITAS anticipates this will increase revenue approximately $15 million to $20 million, excluding the impact of the Medicare Cap.
In addition to the economic impacts, the CARES Act coupled with a series of waivers and guidance issued by the Centers for Medical and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) suspended various Medicare patient coverage criteria and documentation, as well as care requirements. For VITAS, the relief includes the temporary waiver of the requirement to use volunteers and to conduct a nurse visit every two weeks to evaluate aides. Additionally, CMS permitted expanded use of telehealth in providing hospice care to patients.
The situation surrounding COVID-19 remains fluid. We evaluate our cash flow, liquidity and capital resources on a daily basis. VITAS and Roto-Rooter continue to operate and have positive net income and operating cash flow. We have $252.1 million available for borrowing under our $450 million revolving line-of-credit.
On August 6, 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released the fiscal year 2020 hospice wage index and payment rate update (FY 2020 update). The FY 2020 update includes the normal yearly inflationary increase by level of care plus a rebasing of the continuous care, inpatient care and respite care rates. The rebasing of these levels of care was to reflect non-inflationary changes in providers’ costs over time. The rebasing increased the national average reimbursement rate for continuous care by 39.9% and inpatient care by 34.7%. Respite care is not material to our operations. The rebasing of these levels of care was effective on October 1, 2019.
On August 2, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase substantially all of the assets of HSW RR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HSW”) and certain related assets of its affiliates, for $120 million, subject to a working capital adjustment. HSW owned and operated fourteen Roto-Rooter franchises mainly in the southwestern section of the United States, including Los Angeles, Dallas and Phoenix. Included in the assets purchased were the assets of Western Drain Supply, Inc., a plumbing supply company. The purchase was made using a combination of cash on-hand and borrowings under Chemed’s existing $450 million revolving credit facility. On September 16, 2019, we completed the acquisition.
On July 1, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a Roto-Rooter franchise and the related assets in Oakland, CA for $18.0 million in cash.
Reacquired franchise rights, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over the period remaining in each individual franchise agreement. The average amortization period for reacquired franchise rights for the acquisitions made in the third quarter of 2019 is 7.4 years.
The franchise fee revenue, the valuation of reacquired franchise rights and amortization for the acquired franchises are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Multiple of Annual |
| Annualized | |||
|
|
|
| Valuation |
|
| Franchise Fees |
| Amortization of | ||
| 2018 Franchise |
| of Reacquired |
| to Reacquired |
| Reacquired | ||||
| Revenue |
| Franchise Rights |
| Franchise Rights |
| Franchise Rights | ||||
HSW | $ | 1,782 |
| $ | 52,980 |
|
| 29.7 | yrs | $ | 7,258 |
Oakland |
| 95 |
|
| 6,190 |
|
| 65.2 |
|
| 825 |
Subtotal |
| 1,877 |
| $ | 59,170 |
|
| 31.5 | yrs | $ | 8,083 |
All other franchise territories |
| 4,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, | ||||
2020 |
| 2019 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
$ | 2,352 |
| $ | 441 |
Regarding our outlook for 2020, operating during the pandemic has the potential to materially impact the operational metrics and overall operating results of the Company. However, it is expected that the CARES Act funds received by Vitas will be sufficient to substantially offset anticipated costs and lost revenue related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Roto-Rooter is anticipated to receive minimal financial support from the CARES Act. However, it is important to consider Roto-Rooter’s main service is to stop water and raw sewage from flowing and causing destruction to residential and commercial structures. It is primarily a necessity and grudge service that has historically been resistant to even the deepest of recessions. We are early into the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and related shutdown of significant portions of our economy. It is premature, and in fact impossible, to reasonably measure or predict the impact COVID-19 will have on Roto-Rooter’s full year 2020 operating results. Recognizing these issues, we anticipate providing updated 2020 earnings guidance when we issue our second quarter 2020 operating results.
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Material changes in the balance sheet accounts from December 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020 include the following:
A $22.8 million increase in cash and cash equivalents due to timing of payments from the Federal government.
A $9.1 million decrease in accounts receivable due to timing of receipts.
A $5.2 million decrease in investments of deferred compensation plans and a $6.1 million decrease in deferred compensation liabilities due to stock market losses and retirement payments made from the plan.
A $13.3 million decrease in accounts payable due to timing of payments.
A $6.2 million increase in accrued insurance related to the timing of policy years.
A $7.2 million decrease in accrued compensation due to the payments of cash bonuses in the first quarter of 2020.
A $70.0 million increase in long-term debt due mainly due to borrowings related to stock repurchases.
A $111.5 million increase in treasury stock due mainly to stock repurchases.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $15.7 million from March 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020. Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are typically driven by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary. We typically receive a payment in excess of $40.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday. The timing of period end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS. These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.
Management continually evaluates cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.
On June 20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2018 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement consist of a five year, $450 million revolving credit facility and a $150 million expansion feature, which may consist of term loans or additional revolving commitments. The revolving credit facility has a five year maturity with principal payments due at maturity. The interest rate at the inception of the agreement was LIBOR plus 100 basis points.
The 2018 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio.
We have issued $37.9 million in standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2020, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement. As of March 31, 2020, we have approximately $252.1 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility. Management believes its liquidity and sources of capital are satisfactory for the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.
Commitments and Contingencies
Collectively, the terms of our credit agreements require us to meet various financial covenants, to be tested quarterly. We are in compliance with all financial and other debt covenants as of March 31, 2020 and anticipate remaining in compliance throughout the foreseeable future.
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, which can result in penalties including repayment obligations, funding withholding, or debarment, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. Other than as described below, it is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve civil litigation under the False Claims Act brought by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and various relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Missouri. The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to settlement without admission of wrongdoing.
In connection with the settlement VITAS and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate integrity agreement (“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a term of five years during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review Organization to perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the event of breach of the CIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of stipulated penalties or could be excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs.
The Company entered into a settlement agreement in March 2019 that will resolve state-wide wage and hour class action claims raised in four separate cases: (1) Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 (“Seper”); (2) Jiwan Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL (“Chhina”) (which was subsequently merged with Seper); (3) Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755 (“Phillips and Moore”); and (4) Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 17853886 (“Williams’). These actions were brought by both current and former employees including a registered nurse, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), home health aides and a social worker. Each action stated multiple claims generally including (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. The cases generally asserted claims on behalf of classes defined to include all current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of each lawsuit. For additional procedural history of these cases, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.
The Seper and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the filing of amended complaint on August 28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper were identified as named plaintiffs. Discovery in the remaining cases was stayed as to class claims and each court was advised of the pendency of the consolidated Seper/Chhina action. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The settlement amount of $5.75 million plus employment taxes. was recorded in the first quarter of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, $6.0 million was accrued in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The definition of the class to participate in the settlement is intended to cover claims raised in the consolidated Seper/Chhina matter, claims raised in Phillips and Moore, as well as any class claims in Williams. On January 28, 2020, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the members of the class by the class claims administrator. The court has set the date for the final approval of the settlement hearing for May 21, 2020.
Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in RRSC’s Menlo Park branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging (1) failure to provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to properly pay for all hours worked; (3) failure to provide accurate wage statements; (4) failure to reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unfair business practices. Lax stated these claims as a representative of a class defined as all service technicians employed by RRSC in California during the four years preceding the filing of the complaint. He seeks a determination that the action may proceed and be maintained as a class action and for compensatory and statutory damages (premium payments for missed rest periods, uncompensated rest periods, wages for time allegedly not paid such as travel time, repair time, and vehicle maintenance time, and unreimbursed expenses), penalties and restitutions, pre- and post-judgement interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The lawsuit is, Alfred Lax on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, and Does 1 through 50 inclusive; Santa Clara County Superior Court Case Number 18CV338652.
The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of these lawsuits at this time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore and the class claims in Williams.
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in the Lax lawsuit. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, withholding of governmental funding, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Results of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2020 versus 2019 - Consolidated Results
Our service revenues and sales for the first quarter of 2020 increased 11.6% versus services and sales revenues for the first quarter of 2019. Of this increase, a $31.1 million increase was attributable to VITAS and $22.6 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter. The following chart shows the components of revenue by operating segment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine homecare |
| $ | 271,762 |
| $ | 258,847 |
Continuous care |
|
| 40,555 |
|
| 32,244 |
General inpatient |
|
| 32,482 |
|
| 22,570 |
Other |
|
| 3,147 |
|
| 2,010 |
Medicare cap adjustment |
|
| (2,500) |
|
| (3,400) |
Room and board - net |
|
| (3,381) |
|
| (2,542) |
Implicit price concessions |
|
| (4,149) |
|
| (2,948) |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drain cleaning - short term core |
|
| 54,020 |
|
| 44,653 |
Plumbing - short term core |
|
| 36,794 |
|
| 32,418 |
Subtotal |
|
| 90,814 |
|
| 77,071 |
Excavation - short term core |
|
| 43,060 |
|
| 34,538 |
Water restoration |
|
| 29,246 |
|
| 29,208 |
Contractor operations |
|
| 16,228 |
|
| 14,032 |
Outside franchisee fees |
|
| 1,190 |
|
| 1,621 |
Other - short term core |
|
| 550 |
|
| 576 |
Other |
|
| 3,534 |
|
| 3,008 |
Implicit price concessions |
|
| (6,740) |
|
| (4,801) |
Total |
| $ | 515,798 |
| $ | 462,034 |
Days of care at VITAS during the quarter ended March 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Days of Care |
| Increase/(Decrease) | ||
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine homecare | 1,364,746 |
| 1,281,899 |
| 6.5 |
Nursing home | 303,374 |
| 289,769 |
| 4.7 |
Respite | 6,692 |
| 6,301 |
| 6.2 |
Subtotal routine homecare and respite | 1,674,812 |
| 1,577,969 |
| 6.1 |
Continuous care | 32,348 |
| 29,150 |
| 11.0 |
General inpatient | 41,373 |
| 43,923 |
| (5.8) |
Total days of care | 1,748,533 |
| 1,651,042 |
| 5.9 |
The revenue increase at VITAS is comprised primarily of the 5.9% increase in days-of-care, a geographically weighted average Medicare reimbursement rate increase of approximately 5.0%, and acuity mix shift which then reduced the Medicare rate increase approximately 0.9%.
The increase in plumbing revenues for the first quarter of 2020 versus 2019 is attributable to a 13.1% increase in price and service mix shift and an 0.4% increase in job count. The increase in excavation revenues for the first quarter of 2020 versus 2019 is attributable to a 5.7% increase in price and service mix shift and a 19.0% increase in job count. Drain cleaning revenues for the first quarter of 2020 versus 2019 reflect a 8.5% increase in price and service mix shift and a 12.5% increase in job count. Water restoration revenue for the first quarter of 2020 versus 2019 is attributable to a 4.2% increase in job count offset by a 4.1% decrease in price. Contractor operations increased 15.6% mainly due to their continued expansion into water restoration.
The consolidated gross margin was 31.8% in the first quarter of 2020 as compared with 30.3% in the first quarter of 2019. On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 23.2% in the first quarter of 2020 as compared with 21.9%, in the first quarter of 2019 primarily due to increased revenue. The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 48.1% for the first quarter of 2020 as compared with 47.0% in the first quarter of 2019 primarily due to increased revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation and the impact of market value adjustments related to deferred compensation trusts | $ | 78,334 |
| $ | 70,203 |
Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts |
| (9,572) |
|
| 2,338 |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| 1,821 |
|
| 1,488 |
Total SG&A expenses | $ | 70,583 |
| $ | 74,029 |
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation and the impact of market value adjustments related to deferred compensation trusts for the first quarter of 2020 were up 11.6% when compared to the first quarter of 2019. This increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable selling and general administrative expenses caused by increased revenue.
Depreciation for the first quarter of 2020, increased 17.3% when compared to the first quarter of 2019, primarily due to new equipment purchased at Roto-Rooter related to the acquisitions completed in the second half of 2019.
Amortization for the first quarter of 2020, increased 377.3% when compared to the first quarter of 2019 due to the amortization of reacquired franchise rights related to acquisitions completed in the second half of 2019.
Other operating expenses decreased $6.1 million from the first quarter of 2019 primarily as a result of a $6.0 million litigation settlement at VITAS recorded in the first quarter of 2019.
Other (expense)/income – net comprise (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Market value adjustment on assets held in |
|
|
|
| |
deferred compensation trust | $ | (9,572) |
| $ | 2,338 |
Interest income |
| 106 |
|
| 101 |
Total other (expense)/income - net | $ | (9,466) |
| $ | 2,439 |
Our effective tax rate reconciliation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision calculated at the statutory federal rate |
| $ | 14,474 |
|
| $ | 10,665 |
|
Stock compensation tax benefits |
|
| (4,553) |
|
|
| (6,732) |
|
State and local income taxes |
|
| 2,377 |
|
|
| 1,128 |
|
Other--net |
|
| 733 |
|
|
| 1,059 |
|
Income tax provision |
| $ | 13,031 |
|
| $ | 6,120 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
| 18.9 | % |
|
| 12.1 | % |
Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that (reduced) or increased after-tax earnings (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs related to COVID-19 | $ | (726) |
| $ | - |
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| (503) |
|
| (387) |
Litigation settlement |
| - |
|
| (4,476) |
Non cash ASC 842 expenses |
| - |
|
| (489) |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| (1,729) |
|
| (324) |
Direct costs related to COVID-19 |
| (633) |
|
| - |
Non cash ASC 842 expenses |
| - |
|
| (40) |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation |
| 4,553 |
|
| 6,732 |
Stock option expense |
| (4,190) |
|
| (3,327) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| (1,596) |
|
| (1,230) |
Non cash ASC 842 expenses |
| - |
|
| 124 |
Acquisition expense |
| - |
|
| (91) |
Total | $ | (4,824) |
| $ | (3,508) |
Three months ended March 31, 2020 versus 2019 - Segment Results
Net income/(loss) for the first quarter of 2020 versus the first quarter of 2019 by segment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Three months ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
VITAS | $ | 41,279 |
| $ | 29,288 |
Roto-Rooter |
| 24,322 |
|
| 22,986 |
Corporate |
| (9,710) |
|
| (7,607) |
| $ | 55,891 |
| $ | 44,667 |
VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2020 compared to 2019 due to higher revenue and improved labor management and ancillary costs. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at VITAS in the first quarter of 2020 was 12.2% as compared to 9.5% in the first quarter of 2019.
Roto-Rooter’s net income was impacted in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily by higher revenue offset by increased amortization expense. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in the first quarter of 2020 was 13.7% as compared to 14.8% in the first quarter of 2019.
After-tax Corporate expenses for 2020 increased 27.6% when compared to 2019 due mainly to a $2.2 million decrease in the excess tax benefits on stock compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME | |||||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 | |||||||||||
(in thousands)(unaudited) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | ||||
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
2020 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales | $ | 337,916 |
| $ | 177,882 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 515,798 |
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
| 259,429 |
|
| 92,316 |
|
| - |
|
| 351,745 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 22,269 |
|
| 46,282 |
|
| 2,032 |
|
| 70,583 |
Depreciation |
| 5,474 |
|
| 5,878 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 11,388 |
Amortization |
| 18 |
|
| 2,459 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,477 |
Other operating expenses |
| 114 |
|
| 128 |
|
| - |
|
| 242 |
Total costs and expenses |
| 287,304 |
|
| 147,063 |
|
| 2,068 |
|
| 436,435 |
Income/(loss) from operations |
| 50,612 |
|
| 30,819 |
|
| (2,068) |
|
| 79,363 |
Interest expense |
| (45) |
|
| (102) |
|
| (828) |
|
| (975) |
Intercompany interest income/(expense) |
| 4,386 |
|
| 1,349 |
|
| (5,735) |
|
| - |
Other income—net |
| 65 |
|
| 40 |
|
| (9,571) |
|
| (9,466) |
Income/(expense) before income taxes |
| 55,018 |
|
| 32,106 |
|
| (18,202) |
|
| 68,922 |
Income taxes |
| (13,739) |
|
| (7,784) |
|
| 8,492 |
|
| (13,031) |
Net income/(loss) | $ | 41,279 |
| $ | 24,322 |
| $ | (9,710) |
| $ | 55,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | |
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
Pretax benefit/(cost): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense | $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | (5,045) |
| $ | (5,045) |
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| - |
|
| (2,352) |
|
| - |
|
| (2,352) |
Direct costs related to COVID-19 |
| (973) |
|
| (861) |
|
| - |
|
| (1,834) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,821) |
|
| (1,821) |
Medicare cap sequestration |
| (675) |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (675) |
Total | $ | (1,648) |
| $ | (3,213) |
| $ | (6,866) |
| $ | (11,727) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | |
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
After-tax benefit/(cost): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense | $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | (4,190) |
| $ | (4,190) |
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| - |
|
| (1,729) |
|
| - |
|
| (1,729) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,596) |
|
| (1,596) |
Direct costs related to COVID-19 |
| (726) |
|
| (633) |
|
| - |
|
| (1,359) |
Medicare cap sequestration |
| (503) |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (503) |
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 4,553 |
|
| 4,553 |
Total | $ | (1,229) |
| $ | (2,362) |
| $ | (1,233) |
| $ | (4,824) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME | |||||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019 | |||||||||||
(in thousands)(unaudited) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | ||||
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
2019 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales | $ | 306,781 |
| $ | 155,253 |
| $ | - |
| $ | 462,034 |
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
| 239,743 |
|
| 82,208 |
|
| - |
|
| 321,951 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 21,536 |
|
| 39,601 |
|
| 12,892 |
|
| 74,029 |
Depreciation |
| 4,708 |
|
| 4,963 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 9,710 |
Amortization |
| 18 |
|
| 501 |
|
| - |
|
| 519 |
Other operating expenses |
| 6,354 |
|
| (1) |
|
| - |
|
| 6,353 |
Total costs and expenses |
| 272,359 |
|
| 127,272 |
|
| 12,931 |
|
| 412,562 |
Income/(loss) from operations |
| 34,422 |
|
| 27,981 |
|
| (12,931) |
|
| 49,472 |
Interest expense |
| (47) |
|
| (95) |
|
| (982) |
|
| (1,124) |
Intercompany interest income/(expense) |
| 4,394 |
|
| 2,195 |
|
| (6,589) |
|
| - |
Other income—net |
| 88 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 2,337 |
|
| 2,439 |
Income/(expense) before income taxes |
| 38,857 |
|
| 30,095 |
|
| (18,165) |
|
| 50,787 |
Income taxes |
| (9,569) |
|
| (7,109) |
|
| 10,558 |
|
| (6,120) |
Net income/(loss) | $ | 29,288 |
| $ | 22,986 |
| $ | (7,607) |
| $ | 44,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | |
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
Pretax benefit/(cost): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement | $ | (6,000) |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | (6,000) |
Stock option expense |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (4,089) |
|
| (4,089) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,488) |
|
| (1,488) |
Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit |
| (656) |
|
| (55) |
|
| 163 |
|
| (548) |
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| (515) |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (515) |
Acquisition expenses |
| - |
|
| (441) |
|
| - |
|
| (441) |
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (120) |
|
| (120) |
Total | $ | (7,171) |
| $ | (496) |
| $ | (5,534) |
| $ | (13,201) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | |
| VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | ||||
After-tax benefit/(cost): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement | $ | (4,476) |
| $ | - |
| $ | - |
| $ | (4,476) |
Stock option expense |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (3,327) |
|
| (3,327) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (1,230) |
|
| (1,230) |
Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit |
| (489) |
|
| (40) |
|
| 124 |
|
| (405) |
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| (387) |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (387) |
Acquisition expenses |
| - |
|
| (324) |
|
| - |
|
| (324) |
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| (91) |
|
| (91) |
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation |
|
|
|
| - |
|
| 6,732 |
|
| 6,732 |
Total | $ | (5,352) |
| $ | (364) |
| $ | 2,208 |
| $ | (3,508) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies |
|
|
| |||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | ||
For the three months ended March 31, 2020 | VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income/(loss) | $ | 41,279 |
| $ | 24,322 |
| $ | (9,710) |
| $ | 55,891 |
| Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest expense |
| 45 |
|
| 102 |
|
| 828 |
|
| 975 |
| Income taxes |
| 13,739 |
|
| 7,784 |
|
| (8,492) |
|
| 13,031 |
| Depreciation |
| 5,474 |
|
| 5,878 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 11,388 |
| Amortization |
| 18 |
|
| 2,459 |
|
| - |
|
| 2,477 |
| EBITDA |
| 60,555 |
|
| 40,545 |
|
| (17,338) |
|
| 83,762 |
| Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Intercompany interest expense/(income) |
| (4,386) |
|
| (1,349) |
|
| 5,735 |
|
| - |
| Interest income |
| (68) |
|
| (40) |
|
| - |
|
| (108) |
| Stock option expense |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 5,045 |
|
| 5,045 |
| Direct costs related to COVID-19 |
| 973 |
|
| 861 |
|
| - |
|
| 1,834 |
| Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,821 |
|
| 1,821 |
| Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| 675 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 675 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 57,749 |
| $ | 40,017 |
| $ | (4,737) |
| $ | 93,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 | VITAS |
| Roto-Rooter |
| Corporate |
| Consolidated | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income/(loss) | $ | 29,288 |
| $ | 22,986 |
| $ | (7,607) |
| $ | 44,667 |
| Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest expense |
| 47 |
|
| 95 |
|
| 982 |
|
| 1,124 |
| Income taxes |
| 9,569 |
|
| 7,109 |
|
| (10,558) |
|
| 6,120 |
| Depreciation |
| 4,708 |
|
| 4,963 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 9,710 |
| Amortization |
| 18 |
|
| 501 |
|
| - |
|
| 519 |
| EBITDA |
| 43,630 |
|
| 35,654 |
|
| (17,144) |
|
| 62,140 |
| Add/(deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Intercompany interest expense/(income) |
| (4,394) |
|
| (2,195) |
|
| 6,589 |
|
| - |
| Interest income |
| (88) |
|
| (14) |
|
| - |
|
| (102) |
| Litigation settlement |
| 6,000 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 6,000 |
| Non cash ASC 842 expenses/(benefit) |
| 656 |
|
| 55 |
|
| (163) |
|
| 548 |
| Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| 515 |
|
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 515 |
| Acquisition expense |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 120 |
|
| 120 |
| Stock option expense |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 4,089 |
|
| 4,089 |
| Long-term incentive compensation |
| - |
|
| - |
|
| 1,488 |
|
| 1,488 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 46,319 |
| $ | 33,500 |
| $ | (5,021) |
| $ | 74,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME | |||||
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Net income as reported | $ | 55,891 |
| $ | 44,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add/(deduct) pre-tax cost of: |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense |
| 5,045 |
|
| 4,089 |
Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements |
| 2,352 |
|
| 441 |
Direct costs related to COVID-19 |
| 1,834 |
|
| - |
Long-term incentive compensation |
| 1,821 |
|
| 1,488 |
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment |
| 675 |
|
| 515 |
Litigation settlement |
| - |
|
| 6,000 |
Acquisition expense |
| - |
|
| 120 |
Non cash ASC 842 expense |
| - |
|
| 548 |
Add/(deduct) tax impacts: |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax impact of the above pre-tax adjustments (1) |
| (2,350) |
|
| (2,961) |
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation |
| (4,553) |
|
| (6,732) |
Adjusted net income | $ | 60,715 |
| $ | 48,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income | $ | 3.38 |
| $ | 2.70 |
Average number of shares outstanding |
| 16,516 |
|
| 16,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income | $ | 3.68 |
| $ | 2.92 |
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding |
| 16,516 |
|
| 16,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The tax impact of pre-tax adjustments was calculated using the effective tax rate of the operating unit for which each adjustment is associated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES | ||||||
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT | ||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
OPERATING STATISTICS | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||
Net revenue ($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare | $ | 271,762 |
| $ | 258,847 |
|
Inpatient |
| 32,482 |
|
| 22,570 |
|
Continuous care |
| 40,555 |
|
| 32,244 |
|
Other |
| 3,147 |
|
| 2,010 |
|
Subtotal | $ | 347,946 |
| $ | 315,671 |
|
Room and board, net |
| (3,381) |
|
| (2,542) |
|
Contractual allowances |
| (4,149) |
|
| (2,948) |
|
Medicare cap allowance |
| (2,500) |
|
| (3,400) |
|
Total | $ | 337,916 |
| $ | 306,781 |
|
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
| 78.1 | % |
| 82.0 | % |
Inpatient |
| 9.3 |
|
| 7.1 |
|
Continuous care |
| 11.7 |
|
| 10.2 |
|
Other |
| 0.9 |
|
| 0.7 |
|
Subtotal |
| 100.0 |
|
| 100.0 |
|
Room and board, net |
| (1.0) |
|
| (0.9) |
|
Contractual allowances |
| (1.2) |
|
| (1.0) |
|
Medicare cap allowance |
| (0.7) |
|
| (0.9) |
|
Total |
| 97.1 | % |
| 97.2 | % |
Days of care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
| 1,364,746 |
|
| 1,281,899 |
|
Nursing home |
| 303,374 |
|
| 289,769 |
|
Respite |
| 6,692 |
|
| 6,301 |
|
Subtotal routine homecare and respite |
| 1,674,812 |
|
| 1,577,969 |
|
Inpatient |
| 32,348 |
|
| 29,150 |
|
Continuous care |
| 41,373 |
|
| 43,923 |
|
Total |
| 1,748,533 |
|
| 1,651,042 |
|
Number of days in relevant time period |
| 91 |
|
| 90 |
|
Average daily census (days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
| 14,997 |
|
| 14,243 |
|
Nursing home |
| 3,334 |
|
| 3,220 |
|
Respite |
| 74 |
|
| 70 |
|
Subtotal routine homecare and respite |
| 18,405 |
|
| 17,533 |
|
Inpatient |
| 355 |
|
| 324 |
|
Continuous care |
| 455 |
|
| 488 |
|
Total |
| 19,215 |
|
| 18,345 |
|
Total Admissions |
| 18,603 |
|
| 17,758 |
|
Total Discharges |
| 18,196 |
|
| 17,739 |
|
Average length of stay (days) |
| 90.7 |
|
| 91.3 |
|
Median length of stay (days) |
| 14.0 |
|
| 15.0 |
|
ADC by major diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerebro |
| 35.9 | % |
| 35.6 | % |
Neurological |
| 21.4 |
|
| 19.9 |
|
Cancer |
| 12.7 |
|
| 13.1 |
|
Cardio |
| 15.9 |
|
| 16.9 |
|
Respiratory |
| 8.3 |
|
| 8.2 |
|
Other |
| 5.8 |
|
| 6.3 |
|
Total |
| 100.0 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
Admissions by major diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerebro |
| 21.1 |
|
| 20.7 | % |
Neurological |
| 12.5 |
|
| 12.8 |
|
Cancer |
| 28.3 |
|
| 28.0 |
|
Cardio |
| 15.1 |
|
| 16.3 |
|
Respiratory |
| 12.2 |
|
| 12.0 |
|
Other |
| 10.8 |
|
| 10.2 |
|
Total |
| 100.0 | % |
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated uncollectible accounts as a percent of revenues |
| 1.2 | % |
| 1.0 | % |
Accounts receivable -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments |
| 33.9 |
|
| 34.9 |
|
Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments |
| 26.1 |
|
| 23.3 |
|
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe”, “expect”, “hope”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve various known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, which could cause Chemed’s actual results to differ from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. In addition, our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of projections and other financial matters. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risk and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved. Chemed does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of a new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its variable interest line of credit. At March 31, 2020, the Company had $160.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding. For each $10 million dollars borrowed under the credit facility, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the Company’s annual interest expense by $100,000.
The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost versus the benefit of fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and with the participation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, see note 11, Legal and Regulatory Matters, under Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The recent COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
We are closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of our business and geographies, including how it will impact our customers, team members, suppliers, vendors, business partners and distribution channels. The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption, which will adversely affect our business operations and may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
For additional information regarding specific risk factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation under Part I., Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no other material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 2(c). Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table shows the activity related to our share repurchase program for the first three months of 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Number |
| Weighted Average |
| Cumulative Shares |
| Dollar Amount | ||
| of Shares |
| Price Paid Per |
| Repurchased Under |
| Remaining Under | ||
| Repurchased |
| Share |
| the Program |
| The Program | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2011 Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 through January 31, 2020 | - |
| $ | - |
| 8,645,873 |
| $ | 104,018,683 |
February 1 through February 29, 2020 | 110,497 |
|
| 457.73 |
| 8,756,370 |
|
| 53,440,502 |
March 1 through March 31, 2019 | 114,503 |
|
| 433.67 |
| 8,870,873 |
| $ | 253,783,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Total | 225,000 |
| $ | 445.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
| Description |
|
|
|
| Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934. | |
|
|
|
| Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934. | |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
|
|
| Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
|
|
| Certification by Michael D. Witzeman pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
|
|
|
101 |
| The following materials from Chemed Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, (iii) The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, (iv) The Condensed Statement of Equity, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
104 |
| The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chemed Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
| (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
| May 1, 2020 |
| By: |
| /s/ Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
|
|
|
| (President and Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
| May 1, 2020 |
| By: |
| /s/ David P. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
| David P. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
| (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
| May 1, 2020 |
| By: |
| /s/ Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
|
|
|
| Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
|
|
|
| (Vice President and Controller) |
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Kevin J. McNamara, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chemed Corporation (“registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors or persons performing the equivalent function: |
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
E-6
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, David P. Williams, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chemed Corporation (“registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors or persons performing the equivalent function:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ David P. Williams |
|
|
David P. Williams |
|
|
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
E-2
EXHIBIT 31.3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Michael D. Witzeman., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chemed Corporation (“registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors or persons performing the equivalent function:
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
(Vice President and Controller) |
|
|
|
E-3
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION BY KEVIN J. MCNAMARA
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemed Corporation (“Company”), does hereby certify that:
1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2020 (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
E-4
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION BY DAVID P. WILLIAMS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemed Corporation (“Company”), does hereby certify that:
1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2020 (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ David P. Williams |
|
|
David P. Williams |
|
|
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
E-5
EXHIBIT 32.3
CERTIFICATION BY MICHAEL D. WITZEMAN
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Vice President and Controller of Chemed Corporation (“Company”), does hereby certify that:
1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2020 (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
Date: May 1, 2020 |
|
/s/ Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
Michael D. Witzeman |
|
|
(Vice President and Controller) |
|
|
|
E-6