SEC Filing | Chemed Corporation

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

defa14a.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ]	Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]	Definitive Proxy Statement
[X]	Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]	Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-12

Chemed Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]	No fee required.
[ ]	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	(5)	Total fee paid:

[ ]	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ]	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:

	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

	(3)	Filing Party:

	(4)	Date Filed:

CHEMED CORPORATION URGES ITS STOCKHOLDERS

TO PROTECT THEIR INVESTMENT

Sends Letter Recommending Stockholders Vote FOR the Board’s Nominees

on the WHITE Proxy Card Today

CINCINNATI – May 13, 2009 – Chemed Corporation (NYSE:CHE) today mailed the following letter to the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled for May 29, 2009. Chemed stockholders of record as of March 31, 2009 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Chemed’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote today for the Board’s highly qualified nominees by telephone, via the Internet or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card.

May 13, 2009

PROTECT YOUR INVESTMENT!

ELECT YOUR BOARD’S NOMINEES BY VOTING THE WHITE PROXY CARD

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

As Chemed’s May 29, 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders approaches, your Board of Directors urges you to vote the WHITE proxy card to elect the Company’s highly qualified nominees. Your Board and management strongly believe that MMI Investments, L.P. (“MMI”), a dissident hedge fund that is soliciting proxies to elect five dissident nominees to your Board, threatens the value of your investment. Accordingly, your Board urges you not to return any Gold proxy card that MMI may send you, even as a protest. Since returning a Gold proxy card would revoke any previously executed WHITE proxy card submitted by you, the best way to prevent MMI from enacting its self-serving agenda is to simply discard any Gold proxy card you may receive.

If you have previously submitted a Gold proxy card, you may change any vote you may have cast in favor of MMI’s nominees and vote in favor of the Board’s nominees by signing, dating and returning the WHITE proxy card, or by following the instructions on the WHITE proxy card to vote by telephone or via the Internet, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person.

Your Board unanimously believes its nominees are the right nominees for Chemed. Your Board’s nominees include nine of the current members of your Board, as well as two new, independent and highly qualified individuals, Ernest J. Mrozek and Thomas P. Rice.

MMI HAS ONLY ONE OBJECTIVE – SEPARATING CHEMED’S BUSINESSES.

YOUR BOARD BELIEVES NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO DO SO

MMI has one, and only one, idea for your Company: to separate immediately Chemed’s businesses – VITAS and Roto-Rooter. We believe that this idea is extremely short-sighted and threatens the value of your investment. Your Board and management regularly review the Company’s businesses and structure in the context of value-creating alternatives that might be available. Our most recent review, conducted with our outside financial and legal advisors, makes it clear that a separation of Chemed’s businesses is NOT in stockholders’ best interests at this time. In fact, we determined that executing the separation in the current market environment would be risky and could impair, rather than create, value for Chemed’s stockholders. Your Board and management have protected stockholder value by prudently maintaining Chemed’s current corporate structure during the global economic downturn while at the same time taking the appropriate steps to facilitate a separation of Chemed’s businesses when conditions are right.

MMI’S NOMINEES WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE TO VALUE CREATION

We believe that MMI’s nominees, if elected, would not only seek to carry out the dissident’s ill-timed, limited strategy of separating Chemed’s businesses, they would also bring limited relevant experience to the Board. For example:

●	Of MMI’s five nominees, only one has any professional experience in healthcare and only one has any professional experience in residential and commercial cleaning services.

●

In contrast to the more than 141% increase in value your Board has delivered since the announcement of Chemed’s acquisition of VITAS in December 2003, a compounded annual growth rate of nearly 18%, the only three MMI nominees with prior public company board experience have overseen significant value destruction.1

DON’T LET MMI DISTRACT YOU WITH HALF TRUTHS

AND DELIBERATE MISCHARACTERIZATIONS

We believe that MMI has resorted to half truths and mischaracterizations because it cannot substantiate its assertion that a separation of Chemed’s businesses at this time would create value for stockholders. Consider the following:

●

MMI has attempted to impugn the integrity and independence of your Board’s directors by suggestively pointing to directorships and former employment relationships of certain Board members, despite the fact that none of the independent directors has been an employee or a director of any Chemed affiliate for a minimum of nearly ten years. The fact is that nine of the Board’s 11 nominees are independent under the director-independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, the Board’s nominees are in full compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the NYSE and SEC requirements for director independence.

1 The stock price of Unisys Corporation has decreased approximately 69% since Clay B. Lifflander began serving on its board of directors; the stock price of iSECUREtrac has decreased approximately 85% since Peter A. Michel began serving on its board of directors; and the stock price of The Brink’s Company decreased approximately 29% during the time Carroll R. Wetzel, Jr. served on its board of directors.

●

MMI’s insinuations about your management’s views on a potential separation of Chemed’s businesses appear to be deliberate attempts to mislead stockholders. The reality is that your management team has not only consistently stated that it would consider a separation transaction when market and economic conditions are right, but it has in fact already positioned Chemed to separate its businesses at such time.

●

MMI has distorted the facts regarding its investment in Chemed, falsely stating that it has held Chemed stock for over two years, when MMI has really been a Chemed stockholder for only 13 months. In addition, you should know that MMI sold more than 22% of its Chemed holdings in December 2008, which we believe calls into question its so-called “long-term” interest in the Company.

VOTE FOR YOUR BOARD’S NOMINEES ON THE WHITE PROXY CARD TODAY

Your Board and management have a track record of creating value for stockholders and are committed to doing so in the future. With a winning strategy that favors the creation of value for stockholders, Chemed’s Board and management have delivered strong stock price performance and unlocked value through a number of spin-offs and other strategic transactions2.

Protect your investment in Chemed – do not expose your Company’s performance and prospects to the risk of MMI’s short-term, self-serving agenda. Your Board is unanimous in its opposition to MMI and requests that you discard any Gold proxy cards you may receive. We urge all stockholders to vote for the election of all nominees proposed by the Chemed Board, on the WHITE proxy card TODAY.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kevin J. McNamara /s/ George J. Walsh III

Kevin J. McNamara George J. Walsh III

Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board

2 The Dubois Chemicals, Omnicare and National Sanitary Supply transactions, which are the three largest transactions effected by Chemed, generated total gross proceeds of approximately $492 million and resulted in pre-tax gains aggregating approximately $252 million. Since its formation in 1971, Chemed effected seven other divestitures that generated gross proceeds of approximately $219 million and resulted in pre-tax gains of approximately $32 million.