Chemed Corporation 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
þ |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 1-8351
CHEMED CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
31-0791746 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
2600 Chemed Center, 255 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio
|
|
45202-4726 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(513) 762-6900
(Registrants Telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of each exchange |
|
|
on which registered |
|
|
|
Capital Stock Par Value $1 Per Share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, if
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon
the average bid and asked price of said stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transaction Listing on June 29, 2007 ($66.58 per share), was
$1,549,430,319.
At February 15, 2008, 24,149,296 shares of Chemed Capital Stock (par value $1 per share) were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
Document |
|
Where Incorporated |
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders (specified portions)
|
|
Parts I, II, and IV |
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting to be held May 19, 2008
|
|
Part III |
CHEMED CORPORATION
2007 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
Table of Contents
Item 1. Business
General
The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1970 as a subsidiary of W. R. Grace & Co. and
succeeded to the business of W. R. Grace & Co.s Specialty Products Group as of April 30, 1971 and
remained a subsidiary of W. R. Grace & Co. until March 10, 1982. As used herein, Company refers
to Chemed Corporation, and its subsidiaries and Grace refers to W. R. Grace & Co. and its
subsidiaries.
On March 10, 1982, the Company transferred to Dearborn Chemical Company, a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, the business and assets of the Companys Dearborn Group, including the
stock of certain subsidiaries within the Dearborn Group, plus $185 million in cash, and Dearborn
Chemical Company assumed the Dearborn Groups liabilities. Thereafter, on March 10, 1982 the
Company transferred all of the stock of Dearborn Chemical Company to Grace in exchange for
33,481,604 shares of the capital stock of the Company owned by Grace with the result that Grace no
longer has any ownership interest in the Company.
On December 31, 1986, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the business and
assets of Vestal Laboratories, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary. The Company received cash payments
aggregating approximately $67.4 million over the four-year period following the closing, the
substantial portion of which was received on December 31, 1986.
On April 2, 1991, the Company completed the sale of DuBois Chemicals, Inc. (DuBois), a
wholly owned subsidiary, to the Diversey Corporation (Diversey), then a subsidiary of The Molson
Companies Ltd. Under terms of the sale, Diversey agreed to pay the Company net cash payments
aggregating $223,386,000, including deferred payments aggregating $32,432,000.
On December 21, 1992, the Company acquired The Veratex Corporation and related businesses
(Veratex Group) from Omnicare, Inc. The purchase price was $62,120,000 in cash paid at closing,
plus a post-closing payment of $1,514,000 (paid in April 1993) based on the net assets of Veratex.
Effective January 1, 1994, the Company acquired all the capital stock of Patient Care, Inc.
(Patient Care), for cash payments aggregating $20,582,000, plus 35,000 shares of the Companys
Capital Stock. An additional cash payment of $1,000,000 was made on March 31, 1996 and another
payment of $1,000,000 was made on March 31, 1997.
In July 1995, the Companys Omnia Group (formerly Veratex Group) completed the sale of the
business and assets of its Veratex Retail division to Henry Schein, Inc. (HSI) for $10 million in
cash plus a $4.1 million note for which payment was received in December 1995.
Effective September 17, 1996 the Company completed a merger of a subsidiary of the Company,
Chemed Acquisition Corp., and Roto-Rooter, Inc. pursuant to a Tender Offer commenced on August 8,
1996 to acquire any and all of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of Roto-Rooter, Inc. for
$41.00 per share in cash.
On September 24, 1997 the Company completed the sale of its wholly owned business comprising
the Omnia Group to Banta Corporation for $50 million in cash and $2.3 million in deferred payments.
Effective September 30,1997, the Company completed a merger between its 81-percent-owned
subsidiary, National Sanitary Supply Company, and a wholly owned subsidiary of Unisource Worldwide,
Inc. for $21.00 per share, with total payments of $138.3 million.
Effective October 11, 2002, the Company sold its Patient Care subsidiary (Patient Care) to an
investor group that included Schroder Ventures Life Sciences Group, Oak Investment Partners,
Prospect Partners and Salix
1
Ventures. The cash proceeds to the Company totaled $57,500,000, of which $5,000,000 was placed in
escrow pending settlement of Patient Cares receivables with third-party payers. Of this amount,
$2,500,000 was distributed as of October 2003, $1,730,958 was distributed as of November 2004 and
the remainder was distributed as of October 2006. In addition, the Company received a senior
subordinated note receivable (Note) for $12,500,000 and a common stock purchase warrant
(Warrant) for 2% of the outstanding stock of the purchasing company. The Note was due October
11, 2007, and bore interest at the annual rate of 7.5% through September 30, 2004, 8.5% from
October 1,2004, through September 30, 2005, and 9.5% thereafter. This sale was the subject of
litigation which settled in October 2006. We agreed to forgive $1.2 million of post-closing
balance sheet valuation adjustments and convert the remainder into debt secured by a $2.2 million
promissory note with the same terms as the $12.5 million Note. As part of the settlement, we also
recorded a pretax impairment charge of $1.4 million related to the Warrant. In December 2007 we
amended the terms of both notes. We agreed to waive the prepayment penalties if Patient Care paid
$5 million of principal on or before December 31, 2007 and the remainder on or before March 31,
2008. They paid us $5 million of principal on December 31, 2007 and an additional $5.7 million in
principal in January and February 2008.
Effective February 24, 2004, the Company completed a merger of its wholly owned indirect
subsidiary, Marlin Merger Corp., and Vitas Healthcare Corporation. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, Vitas stockholders received cash of $30.00 per share. The transaction, including the
refinancing of existing Vitas debt and other payments made in connection with the merger, totaled
approximately $415 million in cash. In order to complete the merger the Company sold four million
shares of its Capital Stock in a private placement at a price of $25.00 per share, issued $110
million principal amount of floating rate senior secured notes due 2010 (Floating Rate Notes),
issued $150 million principal amount of 8.75% Senior Notes due 2011 (Fixed Rate Notes), and
entered into new $135 million senior secured credit facilities. These obligations were refinanced
in 2005, 2006 and 2007.
On December 22, 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the discontinuance of the operations
of the Companys Service America segment, through an asset sale to the employees of Service
America. The acquiring corporation purchased a substantial majority of Service Americas assets in
exchange for assuming substantially all of Service Americas liabilities in May 2005. Included in
the assets acquired was a receivable from the Company for approximately $4.7 million. The Company
paid $1 million of the receivable upon closing and the remainder was paid over the following year
in 11 equal monthly installments.
During 2007 the Company conducted its business operations in two segments: Vitas Group
(Vitas) and the Roto-Rooter Group (Roto-Rooter).
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains or incorporates by reference certain forward looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company intends
such statements to be subject to the safe harbors created by that legislation. Such statements
involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results of operations to differ materially
from these forward looking statements.
Financial Information about Industry Segments
The required segment and geographic data for the Companys continuing operations (as described
below) for three years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are shown in Note 4 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 17-19 of the 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders and are
incorporated herein by reference.
2
Description of Business by Segment
The information called for by this item is included within Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements appearing on pages 17-19 of the 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
Product and Market Development
Each segment of the Companys business engages in a continuing program for the development and
marketing of new services and products. While new products and services and new market development
are important factors for the growth of each active segment of the Companys business, the Company
does not expect that any new products and services or marketing effort, including those in the
development stage, will require the investment of a material amount of the Companys assets.
Raw Materials
The principal raw materials needed for the Companys manufacturing operations are purchased
from United States sources. Product sales from goods manufactured by Roto-Rooter represent less
than 2% of Chemeds total service revenues and sales. No segment of the Company experienced any
material raw material shortages during 2007, although such shortages may occur in the future.
Products manufactured and sold by the Companys Roto-Rooter segment generally may be reformulated
to avoid the adverse impact of specific raw material shortage.
Patents, Service Marks and Licenses
The Roto-Rooterâ trademarks and service marks have been used and advertised since 1935
by Roto-Rooter Corporation, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company. The
Roto-Rooterâ marks are among the most highly recognized trademarks and service marks in the
United States. The Company considers the Roto-Rooterâ marks to be a valuable asset and a
significant factor in the marketing of Roto-Rooters franchises, products and services and the
products and services provided by its franchises.
Vitas and Innovative Hospice Care are trademarks and servicemarks of Vitas Healthcare
Corporation. The Company and its subsidiaries also own certain trade secrets including training
manuals, pricing information, customer information and software source codes.
Competition
Roto-Rooter
All aspects of the sewer, drain, and pipe cleaning and plumbing repair businesses are highly
competitive. Competition is, however, fragmented in most markets with local and regional firms
providing the primary competition. The principal methods of competition are advertising, range of
services provided, name recognition, speed and quality of customer service, service guarantees, and
pricing.
No individual customer or market group is critical to the total sales of this segment.
Vitas
Hospice care in the United States is competitive. Because programs for hospice services are
generally uniform, Vitas competes primarily on the basis of its ability to deliver quality,
responsive services. Vitas is the nations largest provider of hospice services in a market
dominated by small, non-profit, community-based hospices. Approximately 60% of all hospices are
not-for-profit. Because the hospice care market is highly fragmented, Vitas competes with a large
number of organizations.
3
Vitas also competes with a number of national and regional hospice providers, including
Odyssey Healthcare, Inc. and VistaCare Inc., hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies and
other health care providers. Many providers offer home care to patients who are terminally ill,
and some actively market palliative care and hospice-like programs. In addition, various health
care companies have diversified into the hospice market. Some of these health care companies have
greater financial resources than Vitas.
Relatively few barriers to entry exist in the majority of markets served by Vitas.
Accordingly, other companies that are not currently providing hospice care may enter these markets
and expand the variety of services offered.
Research and Development
The Company engages in a continuous program directed toward the development of new services,
products and processes, the improvement of existing services, products and processes, and the
development of new and different uses of existing products. The research and development
expenditures from continuing operations have not been nor are they expected to be material.
Government Regulations
Roto-Rooter
Roto-Rooters franchising activities are subject to various federal and state franchising laws
and regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Federal Trade Commission (the FTC)
regarding the offering or sale of franchises. The rules and regulations of the FTC require that
Roto-Rooter provide all the prospective franchises with specific information regarding the
franchise program and Roto-Rooter in the form of a detailed franchise offering circular. In
addition, a number of states require Roto-Rooter to register its franchise offering prior to
offering or selling franchises in the state. Various state laws also provide for certain rights in
favor of franchisees, including (i) limitations on the franchisors ability to terminate a
franchise except for good cause, (ii) restrictions on the franchisors ability to deny renewal of a
franchise, (iii) circumstances under which the franchisor may be required to purchase certain
inventory of franchisees when a franchise is terminated or not renewed in violation of such laws,
and (iv) provisions relating to arbitration. Roto-Rooters ability to engage in the plumbing
repair business is also subject to certain limitations and restrictions imposed by state and local
licensing laws and regulations.
Vitas
General. The health care industry and Vitas hospice programs are subject to extensive
federal and state regulation. Vitas hospices are licensed as required under state law as either
hospices or home health agencies, or both, depending on the regulatory requirements of each
particular state. In addition, Vitas hospices are required to meet certain conditions of
participation to be eligible to receive payments as hospices under Medicare and Medicaid programs.
All of Vitas hospices, other than those currently in development, are certified for participation
as hospices in the Medicare program, and are also eligible to receive payments as hospices from the
Medicaid program in each of the states in which Vitas operates. Vitas hospices are subject to
periodic survey by governmental authorities or private accrediting entities to assure compliance
with state licensing, certification and accreditation requirements, as the case may be.
Medicare Conditions of Participation. Federal regulations require that a hospice program
satisfy certain conditions of participation to be certified and receive Medicare payment for the
services it provides. Failure to comply with the conditions of participation may result in
sanctions, up to and including decertification from the Medicare program. See Surveys and Audits
below.
4
The Medicare conditions of participation for hospice programs include the following:
Governing Body. Each hospice must have a governing body that assumes full responsibility for
the policies and the overall operation of the hospice and for ensuring that all services are
provided in a manner consistent with accepted standards of practice. The governing body must
designate one individual who is responsible for the day-to-day management of the hospice.
Medical Director. Each hospice must have a medical director who is a physician and who
assumes responsibility for overseeing the medical component of the hospices patient care program.
Direct Provision of Core Services. Medicare limits those services for which the hospice may
use individual independent contractors or contract agencies to provide care to patients.
Specifically, substantially all nursing, social work, and counseling services must be provided
directly by hospice employees meeting specific educational and professional standards. During
periods of peak patient loads or under extraordinary circumstances, the hospice may be permitted to
use contract workers, but the hospice must agree in writing to maintain professional, financial and
administrative responsibility for the services provided by those individuals or entities.
Professional Management of Non-Core Services. A hospice may arrange to have non-core services
such as therapy services, home health aide services, medical supplies or drugs provided by a
non-employee or outside entity. If the hospice elects to use an independent contractor to provide
non-core services, however, the hospice must retain professional management responsibility for the
arranged services and ensure that the services are furnished in a safe and effective manner by
qualified personnel, and in accordance with the patients plan of care.
Plan of Care. The patients attending physician, the medical director or the designated
hospice physician, and interdisciplinary team must establish an individualized written plan of care
prior to providing care to any hospice patient. The plan must assess the patients needs and
identify services to be provided to meet those needs and must be reviewed and updated at specified
intervals.
Continuation of Care. A hospice may not discontinue or reduce care provided to a Medicare
beneficiary if the individual becomes unable to pay for that care.
Informed Consent. The hospice must obtain the informed consent of the hospice patient, or the
patients legal representative, that specifies the type of care services that may be provided as
hospice care.
Training. A hospice must provide ongoing training for its employees.
Quality Assurance. A hospice must conduct ongoing and comprehensive self-assessments of the
quality and appropriateness of care it provides and that its contractors provide under arrangements
to hospice patients.
Interdisciplinary Team. A hospice must designate an interdisciplinary team to provide or
supervise hospice care services. The interdisciplinary team develops and updates plans of care,
and establishes policies governing the day-to-day provision of hospice services. The team must
include at least a physician, registered nurse, social worker and spiritual or other counselor. A
registered nurse must be designated to coordinate the plan of care.
Volunteers. Hospice programs are required to recruit and train volunteers to provide patient
care services or administrative services. Volunteer services must be provided in an amount equal
to at least five percent of the total patient care hours provided by all paid hospice employees and
contract staff.
5
Licensure. Each hospice and all hospice personnel must be licensed, certified or registered
in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
Central Clinical Records. Hospice programs must maintain clinical records for each hospice
patient that are organized in such a way that they may be easily retrieved. The clinical records
must be complete and accurate and protected against loss, destruction, and unauthorized use.
Surveys and Audits. Hospice programs are subject to periodic survey by federal and state
regulatory authorities and private accrediting entities to ensure compliance with applicable
licensing and certification requirements and accreditation standards. Regulators conduct periodic
surveys of hospice programs and provide reports containing statements of deficiencies for alleged
failure to comply with various regulatory requirements. Survey reports and statements of
deficiencies are common in the healthcare industry. In most cases, the hospice program and
regulatory authorities will agree upon any steps to be taken to bring the hospice into compliance
with applicable regulatory requirements. In some cases, however, a state or federal regulatory
authority may take a number of adverse actions against a hospice program, including the imposition
of fines, temporary suspension of admission of new patients to the hospices service or, in extreme
circumstances, decertification from participation in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or
revocation of the hospices license.
From time to time Vitas receives survey reports containing statements of deficiencies. Vitas
reviews such reports and takes appropriate corrective action. Vitas believes that its hospices are
in material compliance with applicable licensure and certification requirements. If a Vitas
hospice were found to be out of compliance and actions were taken against a Vitas hospice, they
could materially adversely affect the hospices ability to continue to operate, to provide certain
services and to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could materially adversely
affect Vitas.
Billing Audits/ Claims Reviews. The Medicare program and its fiscal intermediaries and other
payors periodically conduct pre-payment or post-payment reviews and other reviews and audits of
health care claims, including hospice claims. There is pressure from state and federal governments
and other payors to scrutinize health care claims to determine their validity and appropriateness.
In order to conduct these reviews, the payor requests documentation from Vitas and then reviews
that documentation to determine compliance with applicable rules and regulations, including the
eligibility of patients to receive hospice benefits, the appropriateness of the care provided to
those patients and the documentation of that care. During the past several years, Vitas claims
have been subject to review and audit.
Certificate of Need Laws and Other Restrictions. Some states, including Florida, have
certificate of need or similar health planning laws that apply to hospice care providers. These
states may require some form of state agency review or approval prior to opening a new hospice
program, to adding or expanding hospice services, to undertaking significant capital expenditures
or under other specified circumstances. Approval under these certificate of need laws is
generally conditioned on the showing of a demonstrable need for services in the community. Vitas
may seek to develop, acquire or expand hospice programs in states having certificate of need laws.
To the extent that state agencies require Vitas to obtain a certificate of need or other similar
approvals to expand services at existing hospice programs or to make acquisitions or develop
hospice programs in new or existing geographic markets, Vitas plans could be adversely affected by
a failure to obtain such certificate or approval. In addition, competitors may seek
administratively or judicially to challenge such an approval or proposed approval by the state
agency. Such a challenge, whether or not ultimately successful, could adversely affect Vitas.
Limitations on For-Profit Ownership. A few states have laws that restrict the development and
expansion of for-profit hospice programs. For example, in New York, a hospice generally cannot be
owned by a corporation that has another corporation as a stockholder. These types of restrictions
could affect Vitas ability to expand into New York, or in other jurisdictions with similar
restrictions.
6
Limits on the Acquisition or Conversion of Non-Profit Health Care Organizations. An
increasing number of states have enacted laws that restrict the ability of for-profit entities to
acquire or otherwise assume the operations of a non-profit health care provider. Some states may
require government review, public hearings, and/or government approval of transactions in which a
for-profit entity proposes to purchase certain non-profit healthcare organizations. Heightened
scrutiny of these transactions may significantly increase the costs associated with future
acquisitions of non-profit hospice programs in some states, otherwise increase the difficulty in
completing those acquisitions or prevent them entirely. Vitas cannot assure that it will not
encounter regulatory or governmental obstacles in connection with any proposed acquisition of
non-profit hospice programs in the future.
Professional Licensure and Participation Agreements. Many hospice employees are subject to
federal and state laws and regulations governing the ethics and practice of their profession,
including physicians, physical, speech and occupational therapists, social workers, home health
aides, pharmacists and nurses. In addition, those professionals who are eligible to participate in
the Medicare, Medicaid or other federal health care programs as individuals must not have been
excluded from participation in those programs at any time.
State Licensure of Hospice. Each of Vitas hospices must be licensed in the state in which it
operates. State licensure rules and regulations require that Vitas hospices maintain certain
standards and meet certain requirements, which may vary from state to state. Vitas believes that
its hospices are in material compliance with applicable licensure requirements. If a Vitas hospice
were found to be out of compliance and actions were taken against a Vitas hospice, they could
materially adversely affect the hospices ability to continue to operate, to provide certain
services and to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could materially adversely
affect Vitas.
Overview of Government PaymentsGeneral. Over 90% of Vitas revenue consisted of payments
from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Such payments are made primarily on a per diem basis.
Under the per diem reimbursement methodology, Vitas is essentially at risk for the cost of eligible
services provided to hospice patients. Profitability is therefore largely dependent upon Vitas
ability to manage the costs of providing hospice services to patients. Increases in operating
costs, such as labor and supply costs that are subject to inflation and other increases, without a
compensating increase in Medicare and Medicaid rates, could have a material adverse effect on
Vitas business in the future. The Medicare and Medicaid programs are increasing pressure to
control health care costs and to decrease or limit increases in reimbursement rates for health care
services. As with most government programs, the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to
statutory and regulatory changes, possible retroactive and prospective rate and payment
adjustments, administrative rulings, freezes and funding reductions, all of which may adversely
affect the level of program payments and could have a material adverse effect on Vitas business.
Vitas levels of revenues and profitability will be subject to the effect of legislative and
regulatory changes, including possible reductions in coverage or payment rates, or changes in
methods of payment, by the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Overview of Government Payments Medicare
Medicare Eligibility Criteria. To receive Medicare payment for hospice services, the hospice
medical director and, if the patient has one, the patients attending physician, must certify that
the patient has a life expectancy of six months or less if the illness runs its normal course.
This determination is made based on the physicians clinical judgement. Due to the uncertainty of
such prognoses, however, it is likely and expected that some percentage of hospice patients will
not die within six months of entering a hospice program. The Medicare program (among other
third-party payers) recognizes that terminal illnesses often do not follow an entirely predictable
course, and therefore the hospice benefit remains available to beneficiaries so long as the hospice
physician or the patients attending physician continues to certify that the patients life
expectancy remains six months or less. Specifically, the Medicare hospice benefit provides for two
initial 90-day benefit periods followed by an unlimited number of 60-day periods. In order to
qualify for hospice care, a Medicare beneficiary must elect hospice care and waive any right to
other Medicare benefits related to his or her terminal illness. A Medicare beneficiary may revoke
his or her election of the Medicare hospice benefit at any time and resume receiving regular
7
Medicare benefits. The patient may elect the hospice benefit again at a later date so long as he
or she remains eligible. Increased regulatory scrutiny of compliance with the Medicare six-month
eligibility rule has impacted the hospice industry. The Medicare program, however, has reaffirmed
that Medicare hospice beneficiaries are not limited to six months of coverage and that there is no
limit on how long a Medicare beneficiary can continue to receive hospice benefits and services,
provided that the beneficiary continues to meet the eligibility criteria under the Medicare hospice
program.
Levels of Care. Medicare pays for hospice services on a prospective payment system basis
under which Vitas receives an established payment rate for each day that it provides hospice
services to a Medicare beneficiary. These rates are subject to annual adjustments for inflation
and vary based upon the geographic location where the services are provided. The rate Vitas
receives depends on which of the following four levels of care is being provided to the
beneficiary:
Routine Home Care. The routine home care rate is paid for each day that a patient is in a
hospice program and is not receiving one of the other categories of hospice care. The
routine home care rate does not vary based upon the volume or intensity of services provided
by the hospice program.
General Inpatient Care. The general inpatient care rate is paid when a patient requires
inpatient services for a short period for pain control or symptom management which cannot be
managed in other settings. General inpatient care services must be provided in a Medicare
or Medicaid certified hospital or long-term care facility or at a freestanding inpatient
hospice facility with the required registered nurse staffing.
Continuous Home Care. Continuous home care is provided to patients while at home, during
periods of crisis when intensive monitoring and care, primarily nursing care, is required in
order to achieve palliation or management of acute medical symptoms. Continuous home care
requires a minimum of 8 hours of care within a 24-hour day, which begins and ends at
midnight. The care must be predominantly nursing care provided by either a registered nurse
or licensed practical nurse. While the published Medicare continuous home care rates are
daily rates, Medicare actually pays for continuous home care services on an hourly basis.
This hourly rate is calculated by dividing the daily rate by 24.
Respite Care. Respite care permits a hospice patient to receive services on an inpatient
basis for a short period of time in order to provide relief for the patients family or
other caregivers from the demands of caring for the patient. A hospice can receive payment
for respite care for a given patient for up to five consecutive days at a time, after which
respite care is reimbursed at the routine home care rate.
Medicare Payment for Physician Services. Payment for direct patient care physician services
delivered by hospice physicians is billed separately by the hospice to the Medicare intermediary
and paid at the lesser of the actual charge or the Medicare allowable charge for these services.
This payment is in addition to the daily rates Vitas receives for hospice care. Payment for
hospice physicians administrative and general supervisory activities is included in the daily
rates discussed above. Payments for attending physician professional services (other than services
furnished by hospice physicians) are not paid to the hospice, but rather are paid directly to the
attending physician by the Medicare intermediary. For fiscal 2007, 1.7% of Vitas net revenue was
attributable to physician services.
Medicare Limits on Hospice Care Payments. Medicare payments for hospice services are subject
to two additional limits or caps. Each of Vitas hospice programs is separately subject to both
of these caps. Both of these caps are determined on an annual basis for the period running
from November 1 through October 31 of each year.
First, under a Medicare rule known as the 80-20 rule applicable to the Medicare inpatient
services, if the number of inpatient care days furnished by a hospice to Medicare beneficiaries
exceeds 20% of the total days of
8
hospice care furnished by such hospice to Medicare beneficiaries, Medicare payments to the hospice
for inpatient care days exceeding the cap are reduced to the routine home care rate. Vitas has
never exceeded the inpatient cap.
Second, Medicare payments to a hospice are also subject to a separate cap based on overall
average payments per admission. Any payments exceeding this overall hospice cap must be refunded
by the hospice. This cap was set at $21,410.04 per admission for the twelve-month period ended on
October 31, 2007, and is adjusted annually to account for inflation. Vitas hospices may be
subject to future payment reductions or recoupments as the result of this cap. As of December 31,
2007 we recorded no cap liability for the 2007 or 2008 measurement periods.
Medicare Managed Care Programs. The Medicare program has entered into contracts with managed
care companies to provide managed care benefits to Medicare beneficiaries who elect to participate
in managed care programs. These managed care programs are commonly referred to as Medicare HMOs,
Medicare + Choice or Medicare risk products. Vitas provides hospice care to Medicare beneficiaries
who participate in these managed care programs, and Vitas is paid for services provided to these
beneficiaries in the same way and at the same rates as those of other Medicare beneficiaries who
are not in a Medicare managed care program. Under current Medicare policy, Medicare pays the
hospice directly for services provided to these managed care program participants and then reduces
the standard per-member, per-month payment that the managed care program otherwise receives.
Overview of Government Payments Medicaid
Medicaid Coverage and Reimbursements. State Medicaid programs are another source of Vitas
net patient revenue. Medicaid is a state-administered program financed by state funds and matching
federal funds to provide medical assistance to the indigent and certain other eligible persons. In
1986, hospice services became an optional state Medicaid benefit. For those states that elect to
provide a hospice benefit, the Medicaid program is required to pay the hospice at rates at least
equal to the rates provided under Medicare and calculated using the same methodology. States
maintain flexibility to establish their own hospice election procedures and to limit the number and
duration of benefit periods for which they will pay for hospice services. Reimbursement from state
Medicaid programs in 2007 accounted for 5% of Vitas revenues.
Nursing Home Residents. For Vitas patients who receive nursing home care under a state
Medicaid program and who elect hospice care under Medicare or Medicaid, Vitas contracts with
nursing homes for the nursing homes provision of room and board services. In addition to the
applicable Medicare or Medicaid hospice daily or hourly rate, the state generally must pay Vitas an
amount equal to at least 95% of the Medicaid daily nursing home rate for room and board services
furnished to the patient by the nursing home. Under Vitas standard nursing home contracts, Vitas
pays the nursing home for these room and board services at the Medicaid daily nursing home rate.
Adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid Payment Rates. Payment rates under the Medicare and
Medicaid programs are adjusted annually based upon the Hospital Market Basket Index; however, the
adjustments have historically been less than actual inflation. On October 1, 2004 the base rates
increased by 3.3%. On October 1, 2005 the base rates increased by 3.4%. On October 1, 2006 the
base rates increased by 3.4%. On October 1, 2007, the base rates increased by 3.3%. These base
rates are further modified by the Hospice Wage Index to reflect local differences in wages
according to the revised wage index. It is possible that there will be further modifications to
the rate structure under which the Medicare or Medicaid programs pay for hospice care services.
Any future reductions in the rate of increase in Medicare and Medicaid payments may have an adverse
impact on Vitas net patient service revenue and profitability.
9
Other Healthcare Regulations
Federal and State Anti-Kickback Laws and Safe Harbor Provisions. The federal Anti-Kickback
Law makes it a felony to knowingly and willingly offer, pay, solicit or receive any form of
remuneration in exchange for referring, recommending, arranging, purchasing, leasing or ordering
items or services covered by a federal health care program including Medicare or Medicaid. The
Anti-Kickback Law applies regardless of whether the remuneration is provided directly or
indirectly, in cash or in kind. Although the Anti-Kickback statute does not prohibit all financial
transactions or relationships that providers of healthcare items or services may have with each
other, interpretations of the law have been very broad. Under current law, courts and federal
regulatory authorities have stated that this law is violated if even one purpose (as opposed to the
sole or primary purpose) of the arrangement is to induce referrals.
Violations of the Anti-Kickback Law carry potentially severe penalties including imprisonment
of up to five years, criminal fines of up to $25,000 per act, civil money penalties of up to
$50,000 per act, and additional damages of up to three times the amounts claimed or remuneration
offered or paid. Federal law also authorizes exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs for
violations of the Anti-Kickback Law.
The Anti-Kickback Law contains several statutory exceptions to the broad prohibition. In
addition, Congress authorized the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to publish numerous safe
harbors that exempt some practices from enforcement action under the Anti-Kickback Law and related
laws. These statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protect various bona fide employment
relationships, contracts for the rental of space or equipment, personal service arrangements, and
management contracts, among other things, provided that certain conditions set forth in the statute
or regulations are satisfied. The safe harbor regulations, however, do not comprehensively
describe all lawful relationships between healthcare providers and referral sources, and the
failure of an arrangement to satisfy all of the requirements of a particular safe harbor does not
mean that the arrangement is unlawful. Failure to comply with the safe harbor provisions, however,
may mean that the arrangement will be subject to scrutiny.
Many states, including states where Vitas does business, have adopted similar prohibitions
against payments that are intended to induce referrals of patients, regardless of the source of
payment. Some of these state laws lack explicit safe harbors that may be available under federal
law. Sanctions under these state anti-kickback laws may include civil money penalties, license
suspension or revocation, exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs, and criminal fines or
imprisonment. Little precedent exists regarding the interpretation or enforcement of these
statutes.
Vitas is required under the Medicare conditions of participation and some state licensing laws
to contract with numerous healthcare providers and practitioners, including physicians, hospitals
and nursing homes, and to arrange for these individuals or entities to provide services to Vitas
patients. In addition, Vitas has contracts with other suppliers, including pharmacies, ambulance
services and medical equipment companies. Some of these individuals or entities may refer, or be
in a position to refer, patients to Vitas, and Vitas may refer, or be in a position to refer,
patients to these individuals or entities. These arrangements may not qualify for a safe harbor.
Vitas from time to time seeks guidance from regulatory counsel as to the changing and evolving
interpretations and the potential applicability of these anti-kickback laws to its programs, and in
response thereto, takes such actions as it deems appropriate. The Company generally believes that
Vitas contracts and arrangements with providers, practitioners and suppliers do not violate
applicable anti-kickback laws. However, the Company cannot assure that such laws will ultimately
be interpreted in a manner consistent with Vitas practices.
HIPAA Anti-Fraud Provisions. HIPAA includes several revisions to existing health care fraud
laws by permitting the imposition of civil monetary penalties in cases involving violations of the
anti-kickback statute or contracting with excluded providers. In addition, HIPAA created new
statutes making it a federal felony to engage in fraud, theft, embezzlement, or the making of false
statements with respect to healthcare benefit programs, which include private, as well as
government programs. In addition, federal enforcement officials have the ability to
10
exclude from the Medicare and Medicaid programs any investors, officers and managing employees
associated with business entities that have committed healthcare fraud, even if the investor,
officer or employee had no actual knowledge of the fraud.
OIG Fraud Alerts, Advisory Opinions and Other Program Guidance. In 1976, Congress established
the OIG to, among other things, identify and eliminate fraud, abuse and waste in HHS programs. To
identify and resolve such problems, the OIG conducts audits, investigations and inspections across
the country and issues public pronouncements identifying practices that may be subject to
heightened scrutiny. In the last several years, there have been a number of hospice related audits
and reviews conducted. These reviews and recommendations have included:
|
|
|
Better ensuring that Medicare hospice eligibility determinations are made in
accordance with the Medicare regulations; and |
|
|
|
|
Revising the annual cap on hospice benefits to better reflect the cost of care
provided. |
From time to time, various federal and state agencies, such as HHS and the OIG, issue a
variety of pronouncements, including fraud alerts, the OIGs Annual Work Plan and other reports,
identifying practices that may be subject to heightened governmental scrutiny. The Company cannot
predict what, if any, changes may be implemented in coverage, reimbursement, or enforcement
policies as a result of these OIG reviews and recommendations.
On April 7, 2005 the Company announced the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the
Department of Health and Human Services served Vitas with civil subpoenas relating to Vitas
alleged failure to appropriately bill Medicare and Medicaid for hospice services. As part of this
investigation, the OIG selected medical records for 320 past and current patients from Vitas three
largest programs for review. It also sought policies and procedures dating back to 1998 covering
admissions, certifications, recertifications, and discharges. During the third quarter of 2005 and
again in May 2006, the OIG requested additional information of the Company. The court dismissed a
related qui tam complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida with
prejudice in July 2007. The plaintiffs are appealing this dismissal. The government continues to
investigate the complaints allegations. Pretax expenses related to complying with OIG requests
have been immaterial in 2007. We incurred pretax expense related to complying with OIG requests
and defending the litigation of $1.1 million and $637,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Federal False Claims Acts. The federal law includes several criminal and civil false claims
provisions, which provide that knowingly submitting claims for items or services that were not
provided as represented may result in the imposition of multiple damages, administrative civil
money penalties, criminal fines, imprisonment, and/or exclusion from participation in federally
funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, the OIG may impose
extensive and costly corporate integrity requirements upon a healthcare provider that is the
subject of a false claims judgement or settlement. These requirements may include the creation of
a formal compliance program, the appointment of a government monitor, and the imposition of annual
reporting requirements and audits conducted by an independent review organization to monitor
compliance with the terms of the agreement and relevant laws and regulations.
The Civil False Claims Act prohibits the known filing of a false claim or the known use of
false statements to obtain payments. Penalties for violations include fines ranging from $5,500 to
$11,000, plus treble damages, for each claim filed. Provisions in the Civil False Claims Act also
permit individuals to bring actions against individuals or businesses in the name of the government
as so called qui tam relators. If a qui tam relators claim is successful, he or she is entitled
to share the governments recovery.
Both direct enforcement activity by the government and quit tam actions have increased
significantly in recent years and have increased the risk that a healthcare company may have to
defend a false claims action, pay
11
fines or be excluded from the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs as a result of an investigation
arising out of this type of an action. Because of the complexity of the government regulations
applicable to the healthcare industry, the Company cannot assure that Vitas will not be the subject
of other actions under the False Claims Act.
State False Claims Laws. At least 10 states and the District of Columbia, including states in
which Vitas currently operates, have adopted state false claims laws that mirror to some degree the
federal false claims laws. While these statutes vary in scope and effect, the penalties for
violating these false claims laws include administrative, civil and/or criminal fines and
penalties, imprisonment, and the imposition of multiple damages.
The Stark Law and State Physician Self-Referral Laws. Section 1877 of the Social Security
Act, commonly known as the Stark Law, prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid
patients for designated health services to entities in which they hold an ownership or investment
interest or with whom they have a compensation arrangement, subject to a number of statutory and
regulatory exceptions. Penalties for violating the Stark Law are severe and include:
|
|
|
Denial of payment; |
|
|
|
|
Civil monetary penalties of $15,000 per referral or $1,000,000 for circumvention
schemes; |
|
|
|
|
Assessments equal to 200% of the dollar value of each such service provided; and |
|
|
|
|
Exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. |
Hospice care itself is not specifically listed as a designated health service; however,
certain services that Vitas provides, or in the future may provide, are among the services
identified as designated health services for purposes of the self-referral laws. The Company
cannot assure that future regulatory changes will not result in hospice services becoming subject
to the Stark Laws ownership, investment or compensation prohibitions in the future.
Many states where Vitas operates have laws similar to the Stark Law, but with broader effect
because they apply regardless of the source of payment for care. Penalties similar to those listed
above as well as the loss of state licensure may be imposed in the event of a violation of these
state self-referral laws. Little precedent exists regarding the interpretation or enforcement of
these statutes.
Civil Monetary Penalties. The Civil Monetary Penalties Statute provides that civil penalties
ranging between $10,000 and $50,000 per claim or act may be imposed on any person or entity that
knowingly submits improperly filed claims for federal health benefits or that offers or makes
payment to induce a beneficiary or provider to reduce or limit the use of health care services or
to use a particular provider or supplier. Civil monetary penalties may be imposed for violations
of the anti-kickback statute and for the failure to return known overpayments, among other things.
Prohibition on Employing or Contracting with Excluded Providers. The Social Security Act and
federal regulations state that individuals or entities that have been convicted of a criminal
offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or Medicaid programs or that
have been convicted, under state and federal law, of a criminal offense relating to neglect or
abuse of residents in connection with the delivery of a healthcare item or service cannot
participate in any federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. Additionally,
individuals and entities convicted of fraud, that have had their licenses revoked or suspended, or
that have failed to provide services of adequate quality also may be excluded from the Medicare and
Medicaid programs. Federal regulations prohibit Medicare providers, including hospice programs,
from submitting claims for items or services or their related costs if an excluded provider
furnished those items or services. The OIG maintains a list of excluded persons and entities.
Nonetheless, it is possible that Vitas might unknowingly bill for services provided by an excluded
person or entity with whom it contracts. The penalty for contracting with an excluded provider may
range
12
from civil monetary penalties of $50,000 and damages of up to three times the amount of payment
that was inappropriately received.
Corporate Practice of Medicine and Fee Splitting. Most states have laws that restrict or
prohibit anyone other than a licensed physician, including business entities such as corporations,
from employing physicians and/or prohibit payments or fee-splitting arrangements between physicians
and corporations or unlicensed individuals. Penalties for violations of corporate practice of
medicine and fee-splitting laws vary from state to state, but may include civil or criminal
penalties, the restructuring or termination of the business arrangements between the physician and
unlicensed individual or business entity, or even the loss of the physicians license to practice
medicine. These laws vary widely from state to state both in scope and origin (e.g. statute,
regulation, Attorney General opinion, court ruling, agency policy) and in most instances have been
subject to only limited interpretation by the courts or regulatory bodies.
Vitas employs or contracts with physicians to provide medical direction and patient care
services to its patients. Vitas has made efforts in those states where certain contracting or fee
arrangements are restricted or prohibited to structure those arrangements in compliance with the
applicable laws and regulations. Despite these efforts, however, the Company cannot assure that
agency officials charged with enforcing these laws will not interpret Vitas contracts with
employed or independent contractor physicians as violating the relevant laws or regulations.
Future determinations or interpretations by individual states with corporate practice of medicine
or fee splitting restrictions may force Vitas to restructure its arrangements with physicians in
those locations.
Health Information Practices. There currently are numerous legislative and regulatory
initiatives at both the state and federal levels that address patient privacy concerns. In
particular, federal regulations issued under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (HIPAA) require Vitas to protect the privacy and security of patients individual
health information. HHS published final regulations addressing patient privacy on December 28,
2000, which were modified on August 14, 2002 (the Privacy Rule). Vitas was required to comply
with the Privacy Rule by April 14, 2003, and Vitas believes that is in material compliance.
Additionally, HIPAA does not automatically preempt applicable state laws and regulations concerning
Vitas use, disclosure and maintenance of patient health information, which means that Vitas is
subject to a complex regulatory scheme that, in many instances, requires Vitas to comply with both
federal and state laws and regulations.
In August 2000, HHS published final regulations establishing health care transaction
standards, and code sets for the electronic transmission of health care information in connection
with certain transactions, such as billing or health plan eligibility (the Transactions
Standard). The official deadline for compliance with the Transactions Standards for covered
entities such as Vitas was October 16, 2003. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) is the division of HHS that is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the Transactions
Standard. Failure to comply with the Transactions Standard may subject covered entities, including
Vitas, to civil monetary penalties and possibly to criminal penalties. Vitas believes that it has
made significant and appropriate good faith efforts to comply with the Transactions Standard and to
develop an appropriate contingency plan as encouraged by CMS. It is unclear, however, how CMS will
regulate providers in general or Vitas in particular with respect to compliance with the
Transactions Standard. Consequently, it also is unclear whether Vitas would be found to be in
material compliance with the Transactions Standard if CMS were to review Vitas electronic claims
submissions and assess Vitas electronic transactions, or whether Vitas would be required to expend
substantial sums on acquiring and implementing new information systems, or would otherwise be
affected in a manner that would negatively impact its profitability.
Additional Federal and State Regulation. Federal and state governments also regulate various
aspects of the hospice industry. In particular, Vitas operations are subject to federal and state
health regulatory laws covering professional services, the dispensing of drugs and certain types of
hospice activities. Some of Vitas employees are subject to state laws and regulations governing
the ethics and professional practice of medicine, respiratory therapy, pharmacy and nursing.
13
Compliance with Health Regulatory Laws. Vitas maintains an internal regulatory compliance
review program and from time to time retains regulatory counsel for guidance on compliance matters.
The Company cannot assure, however, that Vitas practices, if reviewed, would be found to be in
compliance with applicable health regulatory laws, as such laws ultimately may be interpreted, or
that any non-compliance with such laws would not have a material adverse effect on Vitas.
Environmental Matters
Roto-Rooters operations are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations
regarding environmental matters and other aspects of the operation of a sewer and drain cleaning,
HVAC and plumbing services business. For certain other activities, such as septic tank and grease
trap pumping, Roto-Rooter is subject to state and local environmental health and sanitation
regulations.
At December 31, 2007, the Companys accrual for its estimated liability for potential
environmental cleanup and related costs arising from the sale of DuBois Chemicals Inc. (DuBois)
amounted to $1.7 million. Of this balance, $900,000 is included in other liabilities and $826,000
is included in other current liabilities. The Company is contingently liable for additional
DuBois-related environmental cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million. On the
basis of a continuing evaluation of the Companys potential liability, and in consultation with the
Companys environmental attorney, management believes that it is not probable this additional
liability will be paid. Accordingly, no provision for this contingent liability has been recorded.
Although it is not presently possible to reliably project the timing of payments related to the
Companys potential liability for environmental costs, management believes that any adjustments to
its recorded liability will not materially adversely affect its financial position or results of
operations.
The Company, to the best of its knowledge, is currently in compliance in all material respects
with the environmental laws and regulations affecting its operations. Such environmental laws,
regulations and enforcement proceedings have not required the Company to make material increases in
or modifications to its capital expenditures and they have not had a material adverse effect on
sales or net income. Capital expenditures for the purpose of complying with environmental laws and
regulations during 2008 and 2009 with respect to continuing operations are not expected to be
material in amount; there can be no assurance, however, that presently unforeseen legislative
enforcement actions will not require additional expenditures.
Seasonality
Advertising costs for Roto-Rooter inordinately impact the Companys fourth-quarter results.
Roto-Rooter recognizes telephone directory costs immediately upon distribution of a directory by
its publisher into the community. Since a large number of directories are distributed in the
fourth quarter, this direct expense accounting policy results in fourth-quarter earnings including
a disproportionately large share of Roto-Rooters full-year telephone directory advertising
expense. In the fourth quarter 2007, Roto-Rooter expensed $7.3 million of total advertising costs
that represented 32% of its aggregate advertising costs for the full-year 2007.
Employees
On December 31, 2007, Chemed Corporation had a total of 11,783 employees.
Available Information
The Companys Internet address is www.chemed.com. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are electronically
available through the SEC (http://www.sec.gov) or the Companys website as soon as reasonably
practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
14
Annual reports, press releases, Board Committee charters, Code of Ethics, Corporate governance
guidelines and other printed materials may be obtained from the website or from Chemed Investor
Relations without charge by writing to 2600 Chemed Center, 255 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio
45202 or by calling 800-2CHEMED or 513-762-6429.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below. They are not the only ones facing
the Company. Other risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be
immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results
of operations.
GENERAL
We have incurred debt to finance the operations of the Company. We increased our outstanding
debt by $74.3 million in 2007. Our leverage may limit cash flow available for our operations,
could adversely affect our ability to service our debt or obtain additional financing and could
adversely affect our financial health and our ability to react to changes in our business.
The Company has debt service obligations that may restrict our operating flexibility. We
cannot assure you that our cash flow from operations will be sufficient to service our debt, which
may require us to borrow additional funds, or restructure or otherwise refinance our debt. In
addition, the Company has the ability to expand its debt and borrowing capacity subject to various
restrictions and covenants defined by its creditors. The interest rate the Company pays will
fluctuate from time to time based upon a number of factors including current LIBOR rates and
Company operating performance. Significant changes in these factors could result in a material
change in the Companys interest expense.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences for our business. Among other things, our
indebtedness may:
|
|
|
Limit our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the markets
in which we compete; |
|
|
|
|
Place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less
indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
Increase our exposure to interest rate increases due to variable interest rates
on certain borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
Limit our ability to complete future acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
Limit our ability to make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
Render us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
and |
|
|
|
|
Require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to service and
repay our debt. |
Servicing our indebtedness will require a significant amount of cash, and our ability to
generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
15
Our ability to repay or to refinance our indebtedness and to pay interest on our indebtedness
will depend on our operating performance, which may be affected by factors beyond our control.
These factors could include operating difficulties, increased operating costs, our competitors
actions and regulatory developments. Our ability to meet our debt service and other obligations
may depend in significant part on the extent to which we successfully implement our business
strategy. We cannot assure you that we will be able to implement our strategy fully or that the
anticipated results of our strategy will be realized.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations,
we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional equity
capital or restructure our debt. We cannot assure you that our cash flows and capital resources
will be sufficient to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness in the
future or that alternative measures would successfully meet our debt service obligations.
As certain of our obligations under our credit facilities and certain other borrowings could
bear interest at floating rates, an increase in interest rates could further increase our debt
service costs and adversely affect our cash flows.
We have debt that is convertible into shares based on the Companys stock price. This could
significantly dilute the ownership percentage of current stockholders.
The agreements and instruments governing our outstanding debt contain restrictions and limitations
that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business and adversely affect the price
of our Capital Stock.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our instruments of indebtedness
restrict our ability to:
|
|
|
Incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends, make redemptions and purchases of Capital Stock and make other
restricted payments; |
|
|
|
|
Issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Sell assets; |
|
|
|
|
Engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
|
Restrict distributions from subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Incur liens; |
|
|
|
|
Engage in business other than permitted businesses; |
|
|
|
|
Engage in sale/leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
|
Engage in mergers or consolidations; |
|
|
|
|
Make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
Make guarantees; |
16
|
|
|
Make investments and acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
Enter into operating leases; |
|
|
|
|
Hedge interest rates; and |
|
|
|
|
Prepay other debt. |
Moreover, if we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or if we breach any of
these covenants, a default could result under one or more of these agreements. A default, if not
waived by our lenders, could accelerate repayment of our outstanding indebtedness. If acceleration
occurs, we may not be able to repay our debt and it is unlikely that we would be able to borrow
sufficient additional funds to refinance such debt on acceptable terms. In the event of any
default under our credit facilities, the lenders thereunder could elect to declare all outstanding
borrowings, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other fees, to be due and payable, to
require us to apply all of our available cash to repay these borrowings, any of which would be an
event of default.
We depend on our management team and the loss of their service could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our executive management
team. The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to attract or retain other skilled personnel in the future.
Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could increase our expenses and adversely affect our
financial condition.
Our operations are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations
that prohibit or restrict the discharge of pollutants into the environment and regulate employee
exposure to hazardous substance in the workplace. Failure to comply with these laws could subject
us to material costs and liabilities, including civil and criminal fines, costs to cleanup
contamination we cause and, in some circumstances, costs to cleanup contamination we discover on
our own property but did not cause.
Because we use and generate hazardous materials in some of our operations, we are potentially
subject to material liabilities relating to the cleanup of contamination and personal injury
claims. In addition, we have retained certain environmental liabilities in connection with the
sale of former businesses. We are currently funding the cleanup of historical contamination at one
of our former properties and contributing to the cleanup of third-party sites as a result of our
sale of DuBois Chemicals Inc. Although we have established a reserve for these liabilities, actual
cleanup costs may exceed our current estimates due to factors beyond our control, such as the
discovery of additional contamination or the enforcement of more stringent cleanup requirements.
New laws and regulations or their stricter enforcement, the discovery of presently unknown
conditions or the receipt of additional claims for indemnification could require us to incur costs
or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to certain anti-takeover statutes that might make it more difficult to effect a
change in control of the Company.
We are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which prohibits us from engaging in a business combination with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the business
17
combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 could have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change of control that could be advantageous to stockholders.
An adverse ruling against us in certain litigation could have an adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
We are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business currently and from
time to time. The damages claimed against us in some of these cases are substantial.
See the Legal Proceedings sections of this 10-K for discussion of particular matters.
We cannot assure you that we will prevail in pending cases. Regardless of the outcome, such
litigation is costly to manage, investigate and defend, and the related defense costs, diversion of
managements time and related publicity may adversely affect the conduct of our business and the
results of our operations.
ROTO-ROOTER
We face intense competition from numerous, fragmented competitors. If we do not compete
effectively, our business may suffer.
We face intense competition from numerous competitors, many of whom have less leverage than we
do. The sewer, drain and pipe cleaning, and plumbing repair businesses are highly fragmented, with
the bulk of the industries consisting of local and regional competitors. We compete primarily on
the basis of advertising, range of services provided, name recognition, speed and quality of
customer service, service guarantees and pricing. Our competitors may succeed in developing new or
enhanced products and services more successful than ours and in marketing and selling existing and
new products and services better than we do. In addition, new competitors may emerge. We cannot
make any assurances that we will continue to be able to compete successfully with any of these
companies.
Our operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations, exposing us to potential claims and
compliance costs that could adversely affect our business.
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to franchising,
insurance and other aspects of our business. These are discussed in greater detail under
Government Regulations in the Description of Business section hereof. If we fail to comply with
existing or future laws and regulations, we may be subject to governmental or judicial fines and
sanctions. Our franchising activities are subject to various federal and state franchising laws
and regulations, including the rules and regulations of the Federal Trade Commission (the FTC)
regarding the offering or sale of franchises. The rules and regulations of the FTC require us to
provide all of our prospective franchisees with specific information regarding us and our franchise
program in the form of a detailed franchise offering circular. In addition, a number of states
require us to register our franchise offering prior to offering or selling franchises in such
states. Various state laws also provide for certain rights in favor of franchisees, including (i)
limitations on the franchisors ability to terminate a franchise except for good cause, (ii)
restrictions on the franchisors ability to deny renewal of a franchise, (iii) circumstances under
which the franchisor may be required to purchase certain inventory of franchisees when a franchise
is terminated or not renewed in violation of such laws and (iv) provisions relating to arbitration.
The ability to engage in the plumbing repair business is also subject to certain limitations and
restrictions imposed by the state and local licensing laws and regulations. We cannot predict
what legislation or regulations affecting our business will be enacted in the future, how existing
or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered and interpreted, or the amount of
future expenditures that may be required to comply with these laws or regulations. Compliance
costs associated with governmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
18
VITAS
Vitas is highly dependent on payments from Medicare and Medicaid. If there are changes in the rate
or methods governing these payments, Vitas net patient service revenue and profits could
materially decline.
In excess of 90% of Vitas net patient service revenue consists of payments from the Medicare
and Medicaid programs. Such payments are made primarily on a per diem basis, subject to annual
reimbursement caps. Because Vitas receives a per diem fee to provide eligible services to all
patients, Vitas profitability is largely dependent upon its ability to manage the costs of
providing hospice services to patients. Increases in operating costs, such as labor and supply
costs that are subject to inflation, without a compensating increase in Medicare and Medicaid
rates, could have a material adverse effect on Vitas business in the future. Medicare and
Medicaid currently adjust the various hospice payment rates annually based on the increase or
decrease of the hospital wage index basket, regionally adjusted. However, the increases may be
less than actual inflation. Vitas profitability could be negatively impacted if this adjustment
were eliminated or reduced, or if Vitas costs of providing hospice services increased more than
the annual adjustment. In addition, cost pressures resulting from shorter patient lengths of stay
and the use of more expensive forms of palliative care, including drugs and drug delivery systems,
could negatively impact Vitas profitability. Many payors are increasing pressure to control
health care costs. In addition, both public and private payors are increasing pressure to
decrease, or limit increases in, reimbursement rates for health care services. Vitas levels of
revenue and profitability will be subject to the effect of possible reductions in coverage or
payment rates by third-party payors, including payment rates from Medicare and Medicaid.
Each state that maintains a Medicaid program has the option to provide reimbursement for
hospice services at reimbursement rates generally required to be at least as much as Medicare
rates. Most states in which Vitas operates cover Medicaid hospice services; however, we cannot
assure that the states in which Vitas is presently operating or states into which Vitas could
expand operations will continue to cover Medicaid hospice services. In addition, the Medicare and
Medicaid programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive and prospective rate
and payment adjustments, administrative rulings, freezes and funding reductions, all of which may
adversely affect the level of program payments and could have a material adverse effect on Vitas
business. We cannot assure that Medicare and/or Medicaid payments to hospices will not
decrease. Reductions in amounts paid by government programs for services or changes in methods or
regulations governing payments could cause Vitas net patient service revenue and profits to
materially decline.
Approximately one-third of Vitas hospice patients reside in nursing homes. Changes in the laws and
regulations regarding payments for hospice services and room and board provided to Vitas hospice
patients residing in nursing homes could reduce its net patient service revenue and profitability.
For Vitas hospice patients receiving nursing home care under certain state Medicaid programs
who elect hospice care under Medicare and Medicaid, the state generally must pay Vitas, in addition
to the applicable Medicare or Medicaid hospice per diem rate, an amount equal to at least 95% of
the Medicaid per diem nursing home rate for room and board furnished to the patient by the
nursing home. Vitas contracts with various nursing homes for the nursing homes provision of
certain room and board services that the nursing homes would otherwise provide Medicaid nursing
home patients. Vitas bills and collects from the applicable state Medicaid program an amount equal
to approximately 95% of the amount that would otherwise have been paid directly to the nursing home
under the states Medicaid plan. Under Vitas standard nursing home contracts, it pays the nursing
home for these room and board services at approximately 100% of the Medicaid per diem nursing
home rate.
The reduction or elimination of Medicare and Medicaid payments for hospice patients residing
in nursing homes would reduce Vitas net patient service revenue and profitability. In addition,
changes in the way nursing homes are reimbursed for room and board services provided to hospice
patients residing in nursing homes could effect Vitas ability to serve patients in nursing homes.
19
If Vitas is unable to maintain relationships with existing patient referral sources or to establish
new referral sources, Vitas growth and profitability could be adversely affected.
Vitas success is heavily dependent on referrals from physicians, long-term care facilities,
hospitals and other institutional health care providers, managed care companies, insurance
companies and other patient referral sources in the communities that its hospice locations serve,
as well as on its ability to maintain good relations with these referral sources. Vitas referral
sources may refer their patients to other hospice care providers or not to a hospice provider at
all. Vitas growth and profitability depend significantly on its ability to establish and maintain
close working relationships with these patient referral sources and to increase awareness and
acceptance of hospice care by its referral sources and their patients. We cannot assure you that
Vitas will be able to maintain its existing relationships or that it will be able to develop and
maintain new relationships in existing or new markets. Vitas loss of existing relationships or
its failure to develop new relationships could adversely affect its ability to expand or maintain
its operations and operate profitably. Moreover, we cannot assure you that awareness or acceptance
of hospice care will increase or remain at current levels.
Vitas operates in an industry that is subject to extensive government regulation and claims
reviews, and changes in law and regulatory interpretations could reduce its net patient service
revenue and profitability and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
The healthcare industry is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws, rules and
regulations relating to, among others:
|
|
|
Payment for services; |
|
|
|
|
Conduct of operations, including fraud and abuse, anti-kickback prohibitions,
self-referral prohibitions and false claims; |
|
|
|
|
Privacy and security of medical records; |
|
|
|
|
Employment practices; and |
|
|
|
|
Various state approval requirements, such as facility and professional
licensure, certificate of need, compliance surveys and other certification or
recertification requirements. |
Changes in these laws, rules and regulations or in interpretations thereof could reduce Vitas
net patient service revenue and profitability. See the Government Regulations section of this
10-K for a greater description of these matters.
Fraud and Abuse Laws. Vitas contracts with a significant number of health care providers and
practitioners, including physicians, hospitals and nursing homes and arranges for these entities to
provide services to Vitas patients. Some of these health care providers and practitioners may
refer, or be in a position to refer, patients to Vitas (or Vitas may refer patients to them).
These arrangements may not qualify for a safe harbor. Vitas from time to time seeks guidance from
regulatory counsel as to the changing and evolving interpretations and the potential applicability
of the Anti-Kickback Law to its programs, and in response thereto, takes such actions as it deems
appropriate. Vitas generally believes that its contracts and arrangements with providers,
practitioners and suppliers should not be found to violate the Anti-Kickback Law. However, we
cannot assure you that such laws will ultimately be interpreted in a manner consistent with Vitas
practices.
Several health care reform proposals have included an expansion of the Anti-Kickback Law to
include referrals of any patients regardless of payor source, which is similar to the scope of
certain laws that have been enacted at the state level. In addition, a number of states in which
Vitas operates have laws, which vary from state
20
to state, prohibiting certain direct or indirect remuneration or fee-splitting arrangements between
health care providers, regardless of payor source, for the referral of patients to a particular
provider.
The federal Ethics in Patient Referral Act, Section 1877 of the Social Security Act (commonly
known as the Stark Law) prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients for
designated health services to entities in which they hold an ownership or investment interest or
with whom they have a compensation arrangement, subject to certain statutory or regulatory
exceptions. We cannot assure you that future statutory or regulatory changes will not result in
hospice services being subject to the Stark Laws ownership, investment, compensation or referral
prohibitions. Several states in which Vitas operates have similar laws which likewise are subject
to change. Any such changes could adversely affect the business, financial condition and operating
results of Vitas.
Further, under separate statutes, submission of claims for items or services that are not
provided as claimed may lead to civil money penalties, criminal fines and imprisonment and/or
exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federally funded state health care
programs. These false claims statutes include the federal False Claims Act, which allows any
person to bring suit on behalf of the federal government, known as a qui tam action, alleging false
or fraudulent Medicare or Medicaid claims or other violations of the statute and to share in any
amounts paid by the entity to the government in fines or settlement. Any entity found to be
violating the False Claims Act may be liable for up to $11,000 per false claim and treble the
amount of damages the federal government is found to have sustained because of the false claims.
See the discussion of the governmental investigation pending against Vitas under Other Healthcare
Regulations, above.
Certificate of Need Laws. Many states, including Florida, have certificate of need laws or
other similar health planning laws that apply to hospice care providers. These states may require
some form of state agency review or approval prior to opening a new hospice program, to adding or
expanding hospice services, to undertaking significant capital expenditures or under other
specified circumstances. Approval under these certificate of need laws is generally conditioned on
the showing of a demonstrable need for services in the community. Vitas may seek to develop,
acquire or expand hospice programs in states having certificate of need laws. To the extent that
state agencies require Vitas to obtain a certificate of need or other similar approvals to expand
services at existing hospice programs or to make acquisitions or develop hospice programs in new or
existing geographical markets, Vitas plans could be adversely affected by a failure to obtain a
certificate or approval. In addition, competitors may seek administratively or judicially to
challenge such an approval or proposed approval by the state agency. Such a challenge, whether or
not ultimately successful, could adversely affect Vitas.
Other Federal and State Regulations. The federal government and all states regulate various
aspects of the hospice industry and Vitas business. In particular, Vitas operations are subject
to federal and state health regulatory laws, including those covering professional services, the
dispensing of drugs and certain types of hospice activities. Certain of Vitas employees are
subject to state laws and regulations governing professional practice. Vitas operations are
subject to periodic survey by governmental authorities and private accrediting entities to assure
compliance with applicable state licensing, and Medicare and Medicaid certification and
accreditation standards, as the case may be. From time to time in the ordinary course of business,
Vitas receives survey reports noting deficiencies for alleged failure to comply with applicable
requirements. Vitas reviews such reports and takes appropriate corrective action. The failure to
effect such action could result in one of Vitas hospice programs being terminated from the
Medicare hospice program. Any termination of one or more of Vitas hospice locations from the
Medicare hospice program could adversely affect Vitas net patient service revenue and
profitability and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. The failure
to obtain, renew or maintain any of the required regulatory approvals, certifications or licenses
could materially adversely affect Vitas business and could prevent the programs involved from
offering products and services to patients. In addition, laws and regulations often are adopted to
regulate new products, services and industries. We cannot assure you that either the states or the
federal government will not impose additional regulations on Vitas activities, which might
materially adversely affect Vitas.
21
Claims Review. The Medicare and Medicaid programs and their fiscal intermediaries and other
payors periodically conduct pre-payment or post-payment reviews and other reviews and audits of
health care claims, including hospice claims. As a result of such reviews or audits, Vitas could
be required to return any amounts found to be overpaid, or amounts found to be overpaid could be
recouped through reductions in future payments. There is pressure from state and federal
governments and other payors to scrutinize health care claims to determine their validity and
appropriateness. During the past several years, Vitas claims have been subject to review and
audit. We cannot assure you that reviews and/or similar audits of Vitas claims will not result in
material recoupments, denials or other actions that could have a material adverse effect on Vitas
business, financial condition and results of operations. See the discussion of OIG investigation
pending against Vitas under Other Health Care Regulations, above.
Regulation and Provision of Continuous Home Care. Vitas provides continuous home care to
patients requiring such care. Continuous home care is provided to patients while at home, during
periods of crisis when intensive monitoring and care, primarily nursing care, is required in order
to achieve palliation or management of acute medical symptoms. Continuous home care requires a
minimum of 8 hours of care within a 24-hour day, which begins and ends at midnight. The care must
be predominantly nursing care provided by either a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse.
Continuous home care can be challenging for a hospice to provide for a number of reasons,
including the need to have available sufficient skilled and trained staff to furnish such care, the
need to manage the staffing and provision of such care, and a shortage of nurses that can make it
particularly difficult to attract and retain nurses that are required to furnish a majority of such
care. Medicare reimbursement for continuous home care has been calculated by multiplying the
applicable continuous home care hourly rate by the number of hours of care provided. If the care
was provided for less than one hour, Medicare regulations allowed for rounding to the next hour
increment. Effective January 1, 2007, Medicare requires reporting in 15-minute increments of care
provided, with no rounding.
Medicare reimbursement for continuous home care is subject to a number of requirements posing
further challenges for a hospice providing such care. For example, if a patient requires skilled
interventions for palliation or symptom management that can be accomplished in less than 8
aggregate hours within the 24-hour period, if the majority of care can be accomplished by someone
other than a registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse (e.g., if a majority of care is
furnished by a home health aide or homemaker), or if for any reason less than 8 hours of direct
care are provided (such as when a patient dies before 8 AM even if 7 or more hours of care has been
provided), the care rendered cannot be reimbursed by Medicare at the continuous home care rate
(although the care instead may be eligible for Medicare reimbursement at the reduced routine home
care day rate). As a result of such requirements, Vitas may incur the costs of providing services
intended to be continuous home care services yet be unable to bill or be reimbursed for such
services at the continuous home care rate. We cannot assure you that challenges in providing
continuous home care will not cause Vitas net patient service revenue and profits to materially
decline or that reviews and/or similar audits of Vitas claims will not result in material
recoupments, denials or other actions that could have a material adverse effect on Vitas business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Compliance. Vitas maintains an internal regulatory compliance review program and from time to
time retains regulatory counsel for guidance on compliance matters. We cannot assure you, however,
that Vitas practices, if reviewed, would be found to be in compliance with applicable health
regulatory laws, as such laws ultimately may be interpreted, or that any non-compliance with such
laws would not have a material adverse effect on Vitas.
Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to patient privacy could require
Vitas to expend substantial sums on acquiring, implementing and supporting new information systems,
which could negatively impact its profitability.
22
There are currently numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives at both the state and
federal levels that address patient privacy concerns. In particular, regulations issued under the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) require Vitas to protect the
privacy and security of patients individual health information. We cannot predict the total
financial or other impact of the regulations on Vitas operations. In addition, although Vitas
management believes it is in compliance with the requirement of patient privacy regulations, we
cannot assure you that Vitas will not be found to have violated state and federal laws, rules or
guidelines surrounding patient privacy. Compliance with current and future HIPAA requirements or
any other federal or state privacy initiatives could require Vitas to make substantial investments,
which could negatively impact its profitability and cash flows.
Vitas growth strategies may not be successful, which could adversely affect its business.
A significant element of Vitas growth strategy is expected to include expansion of its
business in new and existing markets. This aspect of Vitas growth strategy may not be successful,
which could adversely impact its growth and profitability. We cannot assure you that Vitas will be
able to:
|
|
|
Identify markets that meet its selection criteria for new hospice locations; |
|
|
|
|
Hire and retain qualified management teams to operate each of its new hospice
locations; |
|
|
|
|
Manage a large and geographically diverse group of hospice locations; |
|
|
|
|
Become Medicare and Medicaid certified in new markets; |
|
|
|
|
Generate sufficient hospice admissions in new markets to operate profitably in
these new markets; |
|
|
|
|
Compete effectively with existing hospices in new markets; or |
|
|
|
|
Obtain state licensure and/or a certificate of need from appropriate state
agencies in new markets. |
In addition to growing existing locations and developing new hospice locations, Vitas growth
is expected to include expansion through acquisition of other hospices. We cannot assure you that
Vitas acquisition strategy will be successful. The success of Vitas acquisition strategy depends
upon a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
Its ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates; |
|
|
|
|
Its ability to negotiate favorable acquisition terms, including purchase price,
which may be adversely affected due to increased competition with other buyers; |
|
|
|
|
The availability of financing on favorable terms, or at all; |
|
|
|
|
Its ability to integrate effectively the systems and operations of acquired
hospices; |
|
|
|
|
Its ability to retain key personnel of acquired hospices; and |
|
|
|
|
Its ability to obtain required regulatory approvals. |
Acquisitions involve a number of other risks, including diversion of managements attention
from other business concerns and assuming known or unknown liabilities of acquired hospices,
including liabilities for failure to comply with health care laws and regulations. Integrating
acquired hospices may place significant strains on
23
Vitas current operating and financial systems and controls. Vitas may not successfully overcome
these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with its acquisition strategy.
In addition, since 1990, Vitas has acquired hospice programs, some of which involved
acquisitions of hospice programs from not-for-profit entities. Vitas believes that acquisitions of
not-for-profit programs are generally more complex than acquisitions from for-profit entities and
that a substantial number of acquisition opportunities are likely to involve acquisitions from
not-for-profit entities. Such acquisitions are subject to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
and, in certain states, state attorney general powers, which have been interpreted to require that
the consideration paid for the assets purchased be at fair market value and, where applicable, that
any fees paid for services be reasonable. In many states there is no mechanism for state attorney
general pre-clearance of transactions to assure that applicable standards have been met. Entities
that acquired not-for-profit hospices could face potential liability if the acquisition transaction
is not structured to comply with Internal Revenue Code and state law requirements, and in some
cases the transaction could be enjoined or subject to rescission. The acquisition of
not-for-profit businesses, including the fairness of the purchase price paid, has received
increasing regulatory scrutiny by state attorneys general and other regulatory authorities.
Although Vitas believes that reasonable actions have been taken to date to establish the fair
market value of assets purchased in prior acquisitions of hospice operations from not-for-profit
entities and the reasonableness of fees paid for services, we cannot assure you that such
transactions or any future similar transactions will not be challenged or that, if challenged, the
results of such challenge would not have a material adverse effect on Vitas business.
Vitas loss of key management personnel or its inability to hire and retain skilled employees could
adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Vitas future success significantly depends upon the continued service of its senior
management personnel. The loss of one or more of Vitas key senior management personnel or its
inability to hire and retain new skilled employees could negatively impact Vitas ability to
maintain or increase patient referrals, a key aspect of its growth strategy, and could adversely
affect its future operating results.
Competition for skilled employees is intense, and the process of locating and recruiting
skilled employees with the combination of qualifications and attributes required to care
effectively for terminally ill patients and their families can be difficult and lengthy. We cannot
assure you that Vitas will be successful in attracting, retaining or training highly skilled
nursing, management, community education, operations, admissions and other personnel. Vitas
business could be disrupted and its growth and profitability negatively impacted if it is unable to
attract and retain skilled employees.
A nationwide shortage of qualified nurses could adversely affect Vitas profitability, growth and
ability to continue to provide quality, responsive hospice services to its patients as nursing
wages and benefits increase.
The substantial majority of Vitas workforce is nurses. Vitas depends on qualified nurses to
provide quality, responsive hospice services to its patients. The current nationwide shortage of
qualified nurses impacts some of the markets in which Vitas provides hospice services. In response
to this shortage, Vitas has adjusted its wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses and to
engage contract nurses. Vitas inability to attract and retain qualified nurses could adversely
affect its ability to provide quality, responsive hospice services to its patients and its ability
to increase or maintain patient census in those markets. Increases in the wages and benefits
required to attract and retain qualified nurses or an increase in reliance on contract nurses could
negatively impact profitability.
Vitas may not be able to compete successfully against other hospice providers, and competitive
pressures may limit its ability to maintain or increase its market position and adversely affect
its profitability, financial condition and results of operations.
Hospice care in the United States is highly competitive. In many areas in which Vitas
hospices are located, they compete with a large number of organizations, including:
24
|
|
|
Community-based hospice providers; |
|
|
|
|
National and regional companies; |
|
|
|
|
Hospital-based hospice and palliative care programs; |
|
|
|
|
Physician groups; |
|
|
|
|
Nursing homes; |
|
|
|
|
Home health agencies; |
|
|
|
|
Infusion therapy companies; and |
|
|
|
|
Nursing agencies. |
Various health care companies have diversified into the hospice market. Other companies,
including hospitals and health care organizations that are not currently providing hospice care,
may enter the markets Vitas serves and expand the variety of services offered to include hospice
care. We cannot assure you that Vitas will not encounter increased competition in the future that
could limit its ability to maintain or increase its market position, including competition from
parties in a position to impact referrals to Vitas. Such increased competition could have a
material adverse effect on Vitas business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in rates or methods of payment for Vitas services could adversely affect its revenues and
profits.
Managed care organizations have grown substantially in terms of the percentage of the
population they cover and their control over an increasing portion of the health care economy.
Managed care organizations have continued to consolidate to enhance their ability to influence the
delivery of health care services and to exert pressure to control health care costs. Vitas has a
number of contractual arrangements with managed care organizations and other similar parties.
Vitas provides hospice care to many Medicare beneficiaries who receive their non-hospice
health care services from health maintenance organizations (HMOs) under Medicare risk contracts.
Under such contracts between HMOs and the federal Department of Health and Human Services, the
Medicare payments for hospice services are excluded from the per-member, per-month payment from
Medicare to HMOs and instead are paid directly by Medicare to the hospices. As a result, Vitas
payments for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare risk HMOs are processed in the same way
with the same rates as other Medicare beneficiaries. We cannot assure, however, that payment
for hospice services will continue to be excluded from HMO payment under Medicare risk contracts
and similar Medicare managed care plans or that if not excluded, managed care organization or other
large third-party payors would not use their power to influence and exert pressure on health care
providers to reduce costs in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on Vitas business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Liability claims may have an adverse effect on Vitas, and its insurance coverage may be inadequate.
Participants in the hospice industry are subject to lawsuits alleging negligence, product
liability or other similar legal theories, many of which involve large claims and significant
defense costs. From time to time, Vitas is subject to such and other types of lawsuits. See the
description below under Legal Proceedings. The ultimate liability for claims, if any, could have a
material adverse effect on its financial condition or operating results. Although Vitas currently
maintains liability insurance intended to cover the claims, we cannot assure you that the coverage
limits of such insurance policies will be adequate or that all such claims will be covered by the
insurance. In addition, Vitas insurance policies must be renewed annually and may be subject to
cancellation during the policy
25
period. While Vitas has been able to obtain liability insurance in the past, such insurance varies
in cost, is difficult to obtain and may not be available in the future on terms acceptable to
Vitas, if at all.
A successful claim in excess of the insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on
Vitas. Claims, regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, also may have a material adverse
effect on Vitas business and reputation due to the costs of litigation, diversion of managements
time and related publicity.
Vitas procures professional liability coverage on a claims-made basis. The insurance
contracts specify that coverage is available only during the term of each insurance contract.
Vitas management intends to renew or replace the existing claims-made policy annually but such
coverage is difficult to obtain, may be subject to cancellation and may be written by carriers that
are unable, or unwilling to pay claims. During fiscal 2001, Vitas was notified that one of its
prior carriers was ordered into rehabilitation, and in early fiscal 2002, into liquidation,
creating the possibility that certain prior year claims could be underinsured or uninsured.
Certain claims have been asserted where the coverage would be the responsibility of this prior
carrier and/or other carriers that may not have the financial wherewithal to satisfy the claims.
Additionally, some risks and liabilities, including claims for punitive damages, are not covered by
insurance.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Companys corporate offices and the headquarters for the Roto-Rooter Group are located in
Cincinnati, Ohio. Roto-Rooter has manufacturing and distribution center facilities in West Des
Moines, Iowa and has 69 office and service facilities in 27 states. Vitas, headquartered in Miami,
operates 43 programs from 79 leased facilities in 15 states and the District of Columbia.
All owned property is held in fee and is subject to the security interests of the holders of
our debt instruments. The leased properties have lease terms ranging from one year to nine years.
Management does not foresee any difficulty in renewing or replacing the remainder of its current
leases. The Company considers all of its major operating properties to be maintained in good
operating condition and to be generally adequate for present and anticipated needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Like other large California employers, Vitas faces allegations of purported class-wide wage
and hour violations. Vitas Healthcare Corporation was party to a class action lawsuit filed in the
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, in April of 2004 by Ann Marie Costa, Ana Jimenez,
Mariea Ruteaya and Gracetta Wilson (Costa). It alleged failure to pay overtime wages for hours
worked off the clock on administrative tasks, including voicemail retrieval, time entry, travel
to and from work, and pager response. It also alleged Vitas failed to provide meal and break
periods to a purported class of California nurses, home health aides and licensed clinical social
workers. The case also sought payment of penalties, interest, and plaintiffs attorney fees. The
Company contested these allegations. Plaintiffs moved for class certification, and Vitas opposed
this motion. We reached an agreement with the Plaintiff class in order to avoid the uncertainty of
litigation and the diversion of resources and personnel resulting from it. On June 26, 2006, the
court granted final approval of this settlement ($19.9 million).
Vitas is party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California, Los
Angeles County, in September 2006 by Bernadette Santos, Keith Knoche and Joyce White (Santos).
This case, filed by the Costa case plaintiffs counsel, makes similar allegations of failure to pay
overtime and failure to provide meal and rest periods to a purported class of California admissions
nurses, chaplains and sales representatives. The case likewise seeks
26
payment of penalties, interest and plaintiffs attorney fees. Vitas contests these
allegations. The lawsuit is in its early stage and we are unable to estimate our potential
liability, if any, with respect to these allegations.
Regardless of outcome, such litigation can adversely affect the Company through defense costs,
diversion of managements time, and related publicity. In the normal course of business, we are a
party to various claims and legal proceedings. We record a reserve for these matters when an
adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the potential liability is reasonably estimable.
See also the OIG investigation pending against Vitas under Other Health Care Regulations,
above.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Office |
|
First Elected |
Kevin J. McNamara
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
August 2, 1994 (1) |
Timothy S. OToole
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
May 18, 1992 (2) |
Spencer S. Lee
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
May 15, 2000 (3) |
David P. Williams
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 5, 2004 (4) |
Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President and Controller
|
|
February 1, 1989 (5) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. K. J. McNamara is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and has held these
positions since August 1994 and May 2001, respectively. Previously, he served as an Executive
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company, since November 1993, August 1986
and August 1986, respectively. He previously held the position of Vice President of the
Company, from August 1986 to May 1992 |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. T.S. OToole is an Executive Vice President of the Company and has held this position
since May 1992. He is also Chief Executive Officer of Vitas, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, and has held this position since February 24, 2004. Previously, from May 1992 to
February 24, 2004, he also served the Company as Treasurer. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. S. S. Lee is an Executive Vice President of the Company and has held this position since
May 15, 2000. Mr. Lee is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Roto-Rooter Services
Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and had held this position since January
1999. Previously, he served as a Senior Vice President of Roto-Rooter Services Company from
May 1997 to January 1999. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. D. P. Williams is an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company and has held these positions since August 10, 2007 and March 5, 2004, respectively.
Mr. Williams is also Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Roto-Rooter Group,
Inc., and has held these positions since January 1999. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. A. V. Tucker, Jr. is a Vice President and Controller of the Company and has held these
positions since February 1989. From May 1983 to February 1989, he held the position of
Assistant Controller of the Company. |
Each executive officer holds office until the annual election at the next annual
organizational meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company which is scheduled to be held on
May 19, 2008.
27
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The Companys Capital Stock (par value $1 per share) is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol CHE. The range of the high and low sale prices on the New York Stock Exchange and
dividends paid per share for each quarter of 2006 and 2007 are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing |
|
Dividends Paid |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Per Share |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
59.67 |
|
|
$ |
49.50 |
|
|
$ |
.06 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
61.28 |
|
|
|
50.29 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
54.65 |
|
|
|
32.26 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
38.64 |
|
|
|
29.99 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
49.65 |
|
|
$ |
35.75 |
|
|
$ |
.06 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
68.77 |
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
70.53 |
|
|
|
52.93 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
64.87 |
|
|
|
52.92 |
|
|
|
.06 |
|
Future dividends are necessarily dependent upon the Companys earnings and financial
condition, compliance with certain debt covenants and other factors not presently determinable.
As of February 15, 2008, there were approximately 2,818 stockholders of record of the
Companys Capital Stock. This number only includes stockholders of record and does not include
stockholders with shares beneficially held in nominee name or within clearinghouse positions of
brokers, banks or other institutions.
During 2007, the number of shares of Capital Stock repurchased by the Company, the weighted
average price paid for each share, the cumulative shares repurchased under each program and the
dollar amounts remaining under each program were as follows:
28
Company Purchase of Shares of Capital Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Repurchased |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Of Shares |
|
|
Per |
|
|
Under |
|
|
Under |
|
|
|
Repurchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
The Program |
|
|
The Program |
|
July 2006 Program (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 through January 31, 2007 |
|
|
67,379 |
|
|
$ |
36.41 |
|
|
|
260,777 |
|
|
$ |
40,432,944 |
|
February 1 through February 28, 2007 |
|
|
111,900 |
|
|
$ |
46.86 |
|
|
|
372,677 |
|
|
$ |
35,189,260 |
|
March 1 through March 31, 2007 |
|
|
446,800 |
|
|
$ |
48.29 |
|
|
|
819,477 |
|
|
$ |
13,614,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Total July 2006 Program |
|
|
626,079 |
|
|
$ |
46.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 through April 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
819,477 |
|
|
$ |
13,614,888 |
|
May 1 through May 31, 2007 |
|
|
220,072 |
|
|
$ |
61.87 |
|
|
|
1,039,549 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Total July 2006
Program |
|
|
220,072 |
|
|
$ |
61.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amount authorized for repurchase under the July 2006 Program is $50 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2007 Program (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 through April 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,000,000 |
|
May 1 through May 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,272,928 |
|
|
$ |
65.85 |
|
|
|
1,272,928 |
|
|
$ |
66,174,828 |
|
June 1 through June 30, 2007 |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
64.98 |
|
|
|
1,281,428 |
|
|
$ |
65,622,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Total April 2007
Program |
|
|
1,281,428 |
|
|
$ |
65.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 through October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281,428 |
|
|
$ |
65,622,526 |
|
November 1 through November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281,428 |
|
|
$ |
65,622,526 |
|
December 1 through December 31, 2007 |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
$ |
52.24 |
|
|
|
1,293,250 |
|
|
$ |
65,004,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter Total April
2007 Program |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
$ |
52.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
On April 26, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a $150 million share repurchase plan.
$65.0 million remains authorized under this program with no expiration date. |
As of December 31, 2007, the number of stock options outstanding under the Companys equity
compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, and the number of
securities remaining available for issuance were as follows:
29
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available |
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted-average |
|
for future issuance |
|
|
securities |
|
exercise price of |
|
under equity |
|
|
to be issued upon |
|
outstanding |
|
compensation plans |
|
|
exercise of |
|
options, |
|
[excluding |
|
|
outstanding warrants |
|
warrants and |
|
securities reflected |
|
|
and rights |
|
rights |
|
in column (a)] |
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity Compensation
plans approved by
stockholders |
|
|
1,849,499 |
|
|
$ |
40.96 |
|
|
|
2,107,236 |
|
Equity Compensation
plans not approved
by stockholders (1) |
|
|
38,050 |
|
|
|
23.32 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
1,887,549 |
|
|
$ |
40.60 |
|
|
|
2,107,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In May 1999 the Board of Directors adopted the 1999 Long-Term Employee Incentive Plan without
stockholder approval. This plan permits the Company to grant up to 500,000 shares of
non-qualified options and stock awards to a broad base of salaried and hourly employees
(excluding officers and directors) of the Company. Except for the exclusion of officers and
directors, this plan has the same general terms and provisions as the 2006 Stock Incentive
Plan. In addition, pursuant to this plan no individual may be granted more than 50,000 stock
options in a calendar year, the aggregate number of the shares of Capital Stock which may be
issued pursuant to stock incentives in the form of Stock Awards shall not be more than
270,000, and no stock incentives shall be granted under the plan after May 17, 2009. |
Comparative Stock Performance
The graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the Companys cumulative total
stockholder return on Capital Stock (as measured by dividing (i) the sum of (A) the cumulative
amount of dividends for the period December 31, 2002, to December 31, 2007, assuming dividend
reinvestment, and (B) the difference between the Companys share price at December 31, 2002 and
December 31, 2007; by (ii) the share price at December 31, 2002) with the cumulative total return,
assuming reinvestment of dividends, of the (1) S&P 500 Stock Index and (2) Dow Jones Industrial
Diversified Index.
30
Chemed Corporation
Cumulative Total Stockholder Return for
Five-Year Period Ending December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31... |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Chemed Corporation |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
132.12 |
|
|
|
194.03 |
|
|
|
288.94 |
|
|
|
216.22 |
|
|
|
328.13 |
|
S&P
500 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
128.68 |
|
|
|
142.69 |
|
|
|
149.70 |
|
|
|
173.34 |
|
|
|
182.86 |
|
Dow Jones Industrial Diversified |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
135.28 |
|
|
|
161.22 |
|
|
|
157.01 |
|
|
|
171.98 |
|
|
|
183.58 |
|
31
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information called for by this Item for the five years ended December 31, 2007 is set
forth on page 37 of the 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The
information called for by this Item is set forth on pages 38 through 52 of the 2007 Annual
Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Companys primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its
variable interest term note and line of credit. At December 31, 2007 the Company had $24.5 million
of variable rate debt outstanding. For each $10 million dollars borrowed under these credit
facilities, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the
Companys annual interest expense by $100,000.
The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost
versus the benefit of fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.
The market value of the Companys long-term debt at December 31, 2007 is approximately $210.5
million versus a carrying value of $224.8 million.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated February 28, 2008,
appearing on pages 1 through 34 of the 2007
Annual Report to Stockholders, along with the Supplementary Data (Unaudited Summary of Quarterly
Results) appearing on pages 35-36, are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President and Controller, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that,
as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective and
are reasonably designed to ensure that all material information relating to the Company required to
be included in the Companys reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
32
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Refer to Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on pages 1 and 2 of the Companys 2007 Annual Report
to Stockholders, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act during the Companys
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The directors of the Company are:
Edward L. Hutton
Kevin J. McNamara
Charles H. Erhart, Jr.
Joel F. Gemunder
Patrick P. Grace
Thomas C. Hutton
Walter L. Krebs
Sandra E. Laney
Timothy S. OToole
Donald E. Saunders
George J. Walsh III
Frank E. Wood
The additional information required under this Item is set forth in the Companys 2008 Proxy
Statement and in Part I hereof under the caption Executive Officers of the Registrant and is
incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Companys principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, directors and employees. A
copy of this Code of Ethics is incorporated with this report as Exhibit 14 and it is also posted on
the Companys Web site, www.chemed.com.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required under this Item is set forth in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
33
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Information required under this Item is set forth in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Information required under this Item is set forth in the Companys 2008 Proxy Statement, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
A
description of related party transactions is shown in Note 21 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 29 of the
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit Fees
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed the Company $1,600,000 for 2006 and $1,500,000 for 2007.
These fees were for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of the Companys annual
financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting, review of the financial
statements included in the Companys Forms 10-Q and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-Related Fees
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed the Company $107,000 and $341,000 for 2006 and 2007,
respectively, for audit-related services. In 2006, $11,000 was related to the issuance of a
preferability letter, $11,000 was related to a proposed offering of debt and $85,000 was related to
the audit of one of Vitas Florida subsidiaries. In 2007, $38,000 was related to the adoption of
FIN 48, $218,000 was related to a proposed offering of debt, and $85,000 was related to the audit
of one of Vitas Florida subsidiaries.
Tax Fees
No such services were rendered in 2006 or 2007.
All Other Fees
No other services were rendered in 2006 or 2007.
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy which requires the Committees pre-approval of audit
and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor to assure that the provision of such
services does not impair the auditors independence. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the
audit and non-audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as listed above.
34
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Chemed Corporation.* |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation.* |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
By-Laws of Chemed Corporation.* |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Diversey U.S. Holdings, Inc., D. C. Acquisition Inc.,
Chemed Corporation and DuBois Chemicals, Inc., dated as of February 25, 1991.* |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among National Sanitary Supply Company, Unisource Worldwide,
Inc. and TFBD, Inc. dated as of August 11, 1997.* |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 8, 2002 by and between PCI Holding Corp. and Chemed
Corporation. * |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 11, 2002 by and among PCI
Holding Corp., PCI-A Holding Corp. and Chemed Corporation. * |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of October 11, 2002 by and between PCI Holding Corp.
and Chemed Corporation. * |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
1997 Stock Incentive Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
1999 Long-Term Employee Incentive Plan as amended through May 20, 2002.*,** |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
2002 Stock Incentive Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
2002 Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended May 18, 2004.*,** |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
2004 Stock Incentive Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended August 11, 2006.*,** |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Repurchase Agreement dated May 8, 2007 by and among Chemed Corporation, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.* |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Convertible Senior Note Indenture dated May 14, 2007 for 1.875% Convertible Senior Notes due
2014 by and among Chemed Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors and LaSalle Bank NA, as
Trustee.* |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Employment Contracts with Executives.*,** |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreements with Kevin J. McNamara, Thomas C. Hutton and Sandra E.
Laney dated August 7, 2002.*,** |
35
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Spencer S. Lee dated May 19, 2003.*,** |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreements with Executives dated January 1, 2002.*,** |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Amendment No. 16 to Employment Agreement with Sandra E. Laney dated March 1, 2003.*,** |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Amendment No. 16 to Employment Agreement with Kevin J. McNamara dated May 18, 2004.*,** |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Employment Agreement with David P. Williams dated December 1, 2006.*,** |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Employment Agreement with Timothy S. OToole dated May 6, 2007.** |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 14, 2007 by and among Chemed Corporation, J.P.
Morgan Securities, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.* |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Note Hedge, dated May 8, 2007 between Chemed Corporation and
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA.* |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Note Hedge, dated May 8, 2007 between Chemed Corporation and
Citibank, NA.* |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Form of Convertible Note Warrant Transaction, dated May 8, 2007 between Chemed
Corporation and Citibank, NA.* |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form of Convertible Note Warrant Transaction, dated May 8, 2007 between Chemed
Corporation and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA.* |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Excess Benefits Plan, as restated and amended, effective June 1, 2001.*,** |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Excess Benefits Plan, effective July 1, 2002.*,** |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Excess Benefits Plan, effective November 7, 2003.*,** |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings & Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 1999.*,** |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
First Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings & Retirement Plan, effective September 6,
2000.*,** |
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Second Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings & Retirement Plan, effective January 1,
2001.*,** |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Third Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings & Retirement Plan, effective December 12,
2001.*,** |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Directors Emeriti Plan.*,** |
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Split Dollar Agreement with Edward L. Hutton.*,** |
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Change in Control Severance Plan. *,** |
|
10.39
|
|
Senior Executive Severance Policy. *,** |
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Roto-Rooter Deferred Compensation Plan No. 1, as amended January 1,1998.*,** |
36
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
10.41
|
|
Roto-Rooter Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2.*,** |
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 18, 2003, among Roto-Rooter, Inc.,
Marlin Merger Corp. and Vitas Healthcare Corporation.* |
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2007, among Chemed Corporation, the lenders from time
to time parties thereto and J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA, as Administrative Agent.* |
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2005, among Chemed
Corporation, the lenders from time to time parties thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, as
Administrative Agent.* |
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Amendment No.1 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 31, 2006 among
Chemed Corporation, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and JP Morgan Chase Bank
NA, as Administrative Agent.* |
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award.*,** |
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant.*,** |
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Assets Purchase Agreement of April 1, 2005 between Service America Network, Inc. and Service
America Enterprise, Inc.* |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
13
|
|
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders. |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Policies on Business Ethics of Chemed Corporation.* |
|
|
|
18
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP preferability letter concerning change in accounting principle.* |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Chemed Corporation. |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37
|
|
|
* |
|
This exhibit is being filed by means of incorporation by reference (see Index to Exhibits on page
E-1). Each other exhibit is being filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
** |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
Financial Statement Schedule
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule on page S-1.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
CHEMED CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara
|
|
|
|
Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara
Kevin J. McNamara
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer and
a Director (Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David P. Williams
David P. Williams
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
|
|
Vice President and
Controller
(Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Edward L. Hutton*
|
|
Sandra E. Laney* |
|
|
Charles H. Erhart, Jr.*
|
|
Timothy S. OToole* |
|
|
Joel F. Gemunder*
|
|
Donald E. Saunders* - -Directors |
|
|
Patrick P. Grace* |
|
George J. Walsh III* |
|
|
Thomas C. Hutton*
|
|
Frank E. Wood* |
|
|
Walter L. Krebs*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Naomi C. Dallob by signing her name hereto signs this document on behalf of each of the persons
indicated above pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such persons and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
|
|
February
28, 2008
|
|
/s/ Naomi C. Dallob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Naomi C. Dallob |
|
|
|
|
(Attorney-in-Fact) |
|
|
39
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
2005, 2006 AND 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) |
Chemed Corporation Consolidated Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedule |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
2* |
Consolidated Statement of Income
|
|
3* |
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
4* |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
5* |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
6* |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
7* |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
S-2 |
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
S-3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates page numbers in Chemed Corporation 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders |
The consolidated financial statements of Chemed Corporation listed above, appearing in the
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders, are incorporated herein by reference. The Financial Statement
Schedule should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements listed above.
Schedules not included have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto as listed above.
S-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm on Financial Statement Schedule
To the Board of Directors
of Chemed Corporation
Our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated February 28, 2008 appearing in the
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders of Chemed Corporation (which
report and consolidated financial
statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also
included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K.
In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cincinnati, OH
February 28, 2008
S-2
SCHEDULE II
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN THOUSANDS)
DR/(CR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(CHARGED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREDITED |
|
|
(CHARGED) |
|
|
TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT |
|
|
TO COSTS |
|
|
CREDITED |
|
|
COMPANIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
|
BEGINNING |
|
|
AND |
|
|
TO OTHER |
|
|
ACQUIRED |
|
|
DEDUCTIONS |
|
|
AT END |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
OF PERIOD |
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
ACCOUNTS |
|
|
IN PERIOD |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
OF PERIOD |
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2007 |
|
$ |
(10,180 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,375 |
) |
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,319 |
|
|
$ |
(9,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2006 |
|
$ |
(8,311 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,169 |
) |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,130 |
|
|
$ |
(10,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2005 |
|
$ |
(7,539 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,126 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,354 |
|
|
$ |
(8,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances for doubtful
accounts notes
receivable (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2007 |
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(366 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
With respect to allowances for doubtful accounts, deductions include accounts considered uncollectible or written off, payments, companies divested, etc. |
|
(b) |
|
Classified in consolidated balance sheet as a reduction of accounts receivable. |
|
(c) |
|
Classified in consolidated balance sheet as a reduction of other assets. |
S-3
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Chemed Corporation |
|
Form S-3 Reg. No. 33-44177 11/26/91 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation |
|
Form 8-K 5/16/06 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
By-Laws of Chemed Corporation as amended November 5, 2004 |
|
Form 8-K 11/5/04 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Diversey U.S. Holdings, Inc., D.C. Acquisition Inc., Chemed Corporation and DuBois Chemicals, Inc., dated as of February 25, 1991 |
|
Form 8-K 3/11/91 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among National Sanitary Supply Company, Unisource Worldwide, Inc. and TFBD, Inc. |
|
Form 8-K 10/13/97 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 8, 2002 by and between PCI Holding Corp. and Chemed Corporation |
|
Form 8-K 10/11/02 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 11, 2002 by and among PCI Holding Corp., PCI-A Holding Corp. and Chemed Corporation |
|
Form 8-K 10/11/02 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of October 11, 2002 by and between PCI Holding Corp. and Chemed Corporation |
|
Form 8-K 10/11/02 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
1997 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
Form 10-K |
|
10.10 |
|
|
|
|
3/27/98, ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
Form 10-K |
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
|
3/29/00, ** |
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
10.8
|
|
1999 Long Term Employee
Incentive Plan as amended
through May 20, 2002
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/03, **
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
2002 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/03, **
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
2002 Executive Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended
May 18, 2004
|
|
Form 10-Q
8/19/04, **
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
2004 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
Proxy Statement
3/25/04, ** |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2006 Stock Incentive Plan,
as amended August 11, 2006
|
|
Form 10-Q
8/14/06, **
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Purchase Agreement dated
May 8, 2007 by and among
Chemed Corporation, J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc. and
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Convertible Senior Note
Indenture dated May 14, 2007
for 1.875% Convertible Senior
Notes due 2014 by and among
Chemed Corporation, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and
LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee.
|
|
Form 8-KA
5/22/07
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Employment Contracts with
Executives
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/89, **
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Amendment to Employment
Agreements with Kevin J.
McNamara, Thomas C. Hutton
and Sandra E. Laney
dated August 7, 2002
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/03, **
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment to Employment
Agreement with Spencer S. Lee
dated May 19, 2003
|
|
Form 10-K
3/12/04, **
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amendment to Employment
Agreement with Executives dated
January 1, 2002
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/02, **
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Amendment No. 16 to Employment
Agreement with Sandra E. Laney
dated March 1, 2003
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/03, **
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
10.20
|
|
Amendment No. 16 to Employment
Agreement with Kevin J. McNamara
dated May 18, 2004.
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/05, **
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Employment Agreement with David
P. Williams dated December 1, 2006.
|
|
Form 8-K
12/1/06, **
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Employment Agreement with
Timothy S. OToole dated
May 6, 2007.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/7/07, **
|
|
|
10.02
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated May 14, 2007 by and among
Chemed Corporation, J.P. Morgan
Securities, Inc. and Citigroup
Global Markets Inc.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Note
Hedge, dated May 8, 2007 between
Chemed Corporation and J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, NA.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Confirmation of Convertible Note
Hedge, dated May 8, 2007 between
Chemed Corporation and Citibank,
NA.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Form of Convertible Note Warrant
Transaction, dated May 8, 2007
between Chemed Corporation and
Citibank, NA.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form of Convertible Note Warrant
Transaction, dated May 8, 2007
between Chemed Corporation and
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/17/07
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Excess Benefits Plan, as restated
and amended, effective June 1,
2001
|
|
Form 10-K
3/12/04, **
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
10.29
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Excess Benefits
Plan, effective July 1, 2002
|
|
Form 10-K
3/12/04, **
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Excess Benefits
Plan, effective November 7, 2003
|
|
Form 10-K
3/12/04, **
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
10.31
|
|
Non-Employee Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
Form 10-K
3/24/88, **
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings &
Retirement Plan, effective
January 1, 1999
|
|
Form 10-K
3/25/99, **
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
First Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter Savings & Retirement
Plan effective September 6, 2000
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/02, **
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Second Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter
Savings & Retirement
Plan effective January 1, 2001
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/02, **
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
10.36
|
|
Third Amendment to Chemed/Roto-Rooter
Savings & Retirement
Plan effective December 12, 2001
Directors Emeriti Plan
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/02, **
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
10.24
10.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
5/12/88, ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Split Dollar Agreement with
Edward L. Hutton
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/96, **
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Change in Control Severance
Plan
|
|
Form 8-K
12/1/06, **
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Senior Executive Severance
Policy
|
|
Form 8-K
12/1/06, **
|
|
|
10.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Roto-Rooter Deferred Compensation
Plan No. 1, as amended January 1,
1998
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/01, **
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Roto-Rooter Deferred Compensation
Plan No. 2
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/01, **
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of December 18, 2003,
among Roto-Rooter, Inc., Marlin
Merger Corp. and Vitas Healthcare
Corporation
|
|
Form 8-K
12/19/03
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 2, 2007, among Chemed
Corporation, the lenders from
time to time parties thereto
and J. P. Morgan Chase Bank,
NA, as Administrative Agent.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/07/07
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
10.44
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of February 24,
2005 among Chemed Corporation, the
lenders from time to time, parties
thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank
NA, as Administrative Agent.
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/05
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated
March 31, 2006 among Chemed
Corporation, the lenders from
Time to time parties thereto,
and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, as
Administrative Agent.
|
|
Form 10-Q
4/4/06
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/05, **
|
|
|
10.50
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant
|
|
Form 10-K
3/28/05, **
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Assets Purchase Agreement of April 1, 2005 between Service
America Network, Inc. and
Service America Enterprise, Inc.
|
|
Form 8-K
4/7/05
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
2007 Annual Report to Stockholders
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Policies on Business Ethics of
Chemed Corporation
|
|
Form 10-K
3/12/04
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
preferability letter concerning
change in accounting principle.
|
|
Form 10-Q
11/1/06
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Chemed Corporation
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
*, *** |
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit |
|
File No. and |
|
Previous |
Number |
|
|
|
Filing Date |
|
Exhibit No. |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Kevin J. McNamara
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by David P. Williams
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Kevin J. McNamara
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by David P. Williams
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Certification by Arthur V. Tucker,
Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
*** |
|
Not included within this conformed copy. |
6
EX-12
EXHIBIT 12
CHEMED CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(in thousands, except ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Pretax income/ (loss) from continuing
operations before equity in earnings/
(loss) of affiliate |
|
$ |
16,446 |
|
|
$ |
36,936 |
|
|
$ |
54,656 |
|
|
$ |
90,284 |
|
|
$ |
101,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
30,738 |
|
|
|
24,055 |
|
|
|
31,720 |
|
Amortization of capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income/ (loss) |
|
$ |
21,246 |
|
|
$ |
65,462 |
|
|
$ |
85,016 |
|
|
$ |
113,592 |
|
|
$ |
132,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3,211 |
|
|
$ |
21,167 |
|
|
$ |
21,264 |
|
|
$ |
17,468 |
|
|
$ |
11,244 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Interest component of rental expense |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt (a), (b),
(c), (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
13,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges |
|
$ |
4,800 |
|
|
$ |
28,597 |
|
|
$ |
30,738 |
|
|
$ |
24,055 |
|
|
$ |
31,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (e) |
|
|
4.4 |
x |
|
|
2.3 |
x |
|
|
2.8 |
x |
|
|
4.7 |
x |
|
|
4.2 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2004 includes interest penalties related to the retirement of the Companys 7.31%
senior notes due 2005 through 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2005 includes interest penalties related to the retirement of the Companys
floating rate notes due 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2006 includes interest penalties related to the retirement of the Companys $84.4
million term loan due 2009 . Refer to Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. |
|
(d) |
|
The year ended December 31, 2007 includes interest penalties related to the retirement of the Companys $150
million fixed rate notes due 2011. Refer to Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. |
|
(e) |
|
For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, pretax income/ (loss) from continuing
operations before equity in earnings/ (loss) of affiliate has been added to fixed charges and adjusted for capitalized interest to derive
adjusted income/ (loss). Fixed charges consist of interest expense on debt (including the amortization of deferred financing costs),
capitalized interest, prepayment penalties on the early extinguishment of debt and one-third (the proportion deemed representative
of the interest component) of rental expense. Fixed charge amounts include interest from both continuing and discontinued operations. |
EX-13
Exhibit 13
Financial Review
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
2 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Income |
|
|
3 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
|
4 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows |
|
|
5 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
|
6 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
7 |
|
Unaudited Summary of Quarterly Results |
|
|
35 |
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
37 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and
Results of Operations |
|
|
38 |
|
Officers and Directors Listing and Corporate Information |
|
IBC |
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f). A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and
directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller, has conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on the framework established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited
the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, as stated in their report which appears on
page 2.
1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Chemed Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statement
of income, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Chemed Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility
is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, effective
January 1, 2006 the Company changed its method of accounting for
share-based compensation.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
February 28, 2008
2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales |
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
$ |
915,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold
(excluding depreciation) |
|
|
767,066 |
|
|
|
730,123 |
|
|
|
644,476 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
184,060 |
|
|
|
161,183 |
|
|
|
157,262 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
20,118 |
|
|
|
16,775 |
|
|
|
16,150 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
Other operating expensesnet (Note 6) |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
977,303 |
|
|
|
913,608 |
|
|
|
839,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
122,755 |
|
|
|
104,979 |
|
|
|
76,769 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,244 |
) |
|
|
(17,468 |
) |
|
|
(21,264 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 2) |
|
|
(13,798 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
Loss from impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other incomenet (Note 9) |
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
101,838 |
|
|
|
90,284 |
|
|
|
54,656 |
|
Income taxes (Note 10) |
|
|
(39,063 |
) |
|
|
(32,562 |
) |
|
|
(18,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
62,775 |
|
|
|
57,722 |
|
|
|
36,228 |
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
(Note 7) |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(7,071 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share (Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share (Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Number of Shares Outstanding (Notes 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
24,520 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
25,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
|
26,669 |
|
|
|
26,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except shares and per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 11) |
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
Accounts receivable less allowances of $9,746 (2006 - $10,180) |
|
|
103,113 |
|
|
|
93,086 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
Current deferred income taxes (Note 10) |
|
|
14,212 |
|
|
|
17,789 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
10,496 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
139,405 |
|
|
|
162,113 |
|
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust (Note 14) |
|
|
29,417 |
|
|
|
25,713 |
|
Notes receivable (Notes 7 and 16) |
|
|
9,701 |
|
|
|
14,701 |
|
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation (Note
12) |
|
|
74,513 |
|
|
|
70,140 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $17,245
(2006 - $13,201) (Note 5) |
|
|
65,177 |
|
|
|
69,215 |
|
Goodwill (Note 5) |
|
|
438,689 |
|
|
|
435,050 |
|
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
15,411 |
|
|
|
16,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
$ |
793,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
48,111 |
|
|
$ |
49,744 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 2) |
|
|
10,162 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Income taxes (Note 10) |
|
|
4,221 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
36,337 |
|
|
|
38,457 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
40,072 |
|
|
|
35,990 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,215 |
|
Other current liabilities (Note 13) |
|
|
13,929 |
|
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
152,832 |
|
|
|
166,064 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 10) |
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
26,301 |
|
Long-term debt (Note 2) |
|
|
214,669 |
|
|
|
150,331 |
|
Deferred compensation liabilities (Note 14) |
|
|
29,149 |
|
|
|
25,514 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
5,512 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 15, 19 and 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
407,964 |
|
|
|
371,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 29,260,791
shares
(2006 - 28,849,918 shares) |
|
|
29,261 |
|
|
|
28,850 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
267,312 |
|
|
|
252,639 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
278,336 |
|
|
|
215,517 |
|
Treasury stock - 5,299,056 shares (2006 - 3,023,635 shares), at cost |
|
|
(213,041 |
) |
|
|
(78,064 |
) |
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock (Note 14) |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
364,349 |
|
|
|
421,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
$ |
793,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this
statement.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,388 |
|
|
|
22,030 |
|
|
|
21,072 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
8,169 |
|
|
|
7,126 |
|
Write-off unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
Noncash portion of long-term incentive compensation |
|
|
6,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,813 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes (Note 10) |
|
|
8,113 |
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
Discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
7,071 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
Loss on impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding
amounts acquired in business combinations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(18,416 |
) |
|
|
(12,527 |
) |
|
|
(34,145 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
520 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses
and other current assets |
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable
and other current liabilities |
|
|
(8,299 |
) |
|
|
(13,017 |
) |
|
|
32,431 |
|
Increase in income taxes |
|
|
6,321 |
|
|
|
18,726 |
|
|
|
15,359 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(3,655 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
Increase/(decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
(3,091 |
) |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncash expense of internally financed ESOPs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Other sources |
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
|
|
99,584 |
|
|
|
89,469 |
|
|
|
81,953 |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by discontinued
operations (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
99,584 |
|
|
|
98,589 |
|
|
|
80,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(26,640 |
) |
|
|
(21,987 |
) |
|
|
(25,734 |
) |
Net uses from sale of discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
(5,402 |
) |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(9,367 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Business combinations, net of cash acquired (Note 8) |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
(4,145 |
) |
|
|
(6,165 |
) |
Investing activities of discontinued operations (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Other uses |
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(31,718 |
) |
|
|
(27,732 |
) |
|
|
(41,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (Note 2) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt (Note 2) |
|
|
(225,709 |
) |
|
|
(84,563 |
) |
|
|
(141,592 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 22) |
|
|
(131,704 |
) |
|
|
(19,885 |
) |
|
|
(7,401 |
) |
Purchase of note hedges (Note 2) |
|
|
(55,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants (Note 2) |
|
|
27,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(6,949 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
|
|
(6,322 |
) |
|
|
(6,172 |
) |
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options (Note 3) |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
Change in cash overdraft payable |
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
Other sources |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(92,152 |
) |
|
|
(98,716 |
) |
|
|
(52,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(24,286 |
) |
|
|
(27,859 |
) |
|
|
(14,315 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
29,274 |
|
|
|
57,133 |
|
|
|
71,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
$ |
57,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this
statement.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES
IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Payable in |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stock- |
|
|
Company |
|
|
for |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
at Cost |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Shares Sold |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
13,491 |
|
|
$ |
209,101 |
|
|
$ |
141,542 |
|
|
$ |
(33,873 |
) |
|
$ |
2,375 |
|
|
$ |
(544 |
) |
|
$ |
332,092 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,817 |
|
Dividends paid ($.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,172 |
) |
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 3) |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
38,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,207 |
|
Impact of common share split |
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
(13,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
Decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
28,374 |
|
|
|
234,910 |
|
|
|
171,188 |
|
|
|
(52,127 |
) |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
384,175 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,651 |
|
Dividends paid ($.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,322 |
) |
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 3) |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,612 |
) |
Decrease in notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
28,850 |
|
|
|
252,639 |
|
|
|
215,517 |
|
|
|
(78,064 |
) |
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,361 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
as of January 1, 2007 (Notes 1 and 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,731 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,976 |
|
Dividends paid ($.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 3) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,520 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,881 |
) |
Purchase of note hedges (Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,894 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit of purchased note hedges
(Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,036 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants (Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,614 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
29,261 |
|
|
$ |
267,312 |
|
|
$ |
278,336 |
|
|
$ |
(213,041 |
) |
|
$ |
2,481 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
364,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
We operate through our two wholly owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation
(VITAS) and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (Roto-Rooter). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps
make terminally ill patients final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of
doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct
medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and
their families. Roto-Rooter is focused on providing plumbing and drain cleaning services to both
residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent
contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90%
of the U.S. population.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chemed Corporation and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
We have analyzed the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46R Consolidation of Variable Interest Entitiesan interpretation of
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (revised) (FIN 46R) relative to contractual relationships
with our Roto-Rooter independent contractors and franchisees. FIN 46R requires the primary
beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) to consolidate the accounts of the VIE. We
have evaluated the relationships with our independent contractors and franchisees based upon
guidance provided in FIN 46R and have concluded that certain of the independent contractors may
be VIEs. Based on our evaluation, the franchisees are not VIEs. We believe consolidation, if
required, of the accounts of any independent contractor for which we might be the primary
beneficiary would not materially impact our financial position or results of operations.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents comprise short-term, highly liquid investments that have been purchased
within three months of their dates of maturity.
ACCOUNTS AND LOANS RECEIVABLE AND CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Accounts and loans receivable are recorded at the principal balance outstanding less
estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. For the Roto-Rooter segment, allowances for
trade accounts receivable are generally provided for accounts more than 90 days past due,
although collection efforts continue beyond that time. Due to the small number of loans
receivable outstanding, allowances for loan losses are determined on a case-by-case basis. For
the VITAS segment, allowances for patient accounts receivable are generally provided on accounts
more than 240 days old plus an appropriate percentage of accounts not yet 240 days old. Final
write-off of overdue accounts or loans receivable is made when all reasonable collection efforts
have been made and payment is not forthcoming. We closely monitor our receivables and
periodically review procedures for granting credit to attempt to hold losses to a minimum.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 63% and 62%, respectively, of VITAS total
accounts receivable balance were due from Medicare and 28% and 30%, respectively, of VITAS
total accounts receivable balance were due from various state Medicaid programs. Combined
accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid represent 80% of the net accounts receivable in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007. We closely monitor our
programs to ensure compliance with Medicare and Medicaid regulations.
INVENTORIES
Substantially all of the inventories are either general merchandise or finished goods.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. For determining the value of
inventories, cost methods that reasonably approximate the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method
are used.
OTHER INVESTMENTS
To the extent that we hold any, investments are reviewed periodically for impairment based
on available market and financial data. If the market value or net realizable value of the
investment is less than our cost and the decline is determined to be other than temporary, a
write-down to fair value is made and a realized loss is recorded in the statement of income. In
calculating realized gains and losses on the sales of investments, the specific-identification
method is used to determine the cost of investments sold.
7
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
DEPRECIATION AND PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation of properties and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser
of the remaining lease terms (excluding option terms) or their useful lives. Expenditures for
maintenance, repairs, renewals and betterments that do not materially prolong the useful lives
of the assets are expensed as incurred. The cost of property retired or sold and the related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is
reflected currently in income.
Expenditures for major software purchases and software developed for internal use are
capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets. For software developed for internal use, external direct costs for materials and
services and certain internal payroll and related fringe benefit costs are capitalized in
accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.
The weighted average lives of our property and equipment at December 31, 2007, were:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
12.8 |
yrs. |
Transportation equipment |
|
|
5.9 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
5.8 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
4.8 |
|
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations
and are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets. The selection of an amortization method is based on which
method best reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset. The VITAS trade name is
considered to have an indefinite life. Goodwill and the VITAS trade name are tested at least
annually for impairment.
The weighted average lives of our identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets at December
31, 2007, were:
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants not to compete |
|
6.3 |
yrs. |
Referral networks |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Customer lists |
|
|
13.3 |
|
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
If we believe a triggering event may have occurred that indicates a possible impairment of
our long-lived assets, we perform an estimate and valuation of the future benefits of our
long-lived assets (other than goodwill and the VITAS trade name) based on key financial
indicators. If the projected undiscounted cash flows of a major business unit indicate that
property and equipment or identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets have been impaired, a
write-down to fair value is made.
OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs are included in other assets and are amortized using the effective
interest method over the life of the debt.
We capitalize the direct costs of obtaining licenses to operate hospice programs subject to
a minimum capitalization threshold. These costs are amortized over the life of the license
using the straight-line method. Certain licenses are granted without an expiration and thus, we
believe them to be indefinite-lived assets subject to impairment testing on at least an annual
basis.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Both the VITAS segment and Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when
the earnings process has been completed. Generally, this occurs when services are provided or
products are delivered. Sales of Roto-Rooter
products, including drain cleaning machines and drain cleaning solution, comprise less than
2% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007.
VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers,
which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid. Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in
part on the basis that such services are not
8
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
eligible for coverage and do not qualify for
reimbursement. We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial
statements. The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and
does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis. Medicare billings are
subject to certain limitations, as described below.
VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services. Specifically,
if the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries
exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care such program provided to all Medicare patients for
an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed
only at the routine homecare rate. None of VITAS hospice programs exceeded the payment limits
on inpatient services in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (Medicare Cap).
Compliance with the Medicare Cap is measured by comparing the total Medicare payments received
under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care
beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number between
November 1 of each year and October 31 of the following year with the product of the
per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for
the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of
the following year.
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific
admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether
revenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap. Should we determine that
revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare Cap based on projected trends, we
attempt to institute corrective action to change the patient mix or to increase patient
admissions. However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from
exceeding its Medicare Cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that
will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare Cap and record the amount as
a reduction to service revenue.
Our estimate of the Medicare Cap liability is particularly sensitive to allocations made by
our fiscal intermediary relative to patient transfers between hospices. We are allocated a
percentage of the Medicare Cap based on the days a patient spent in our care as compared to the
total days a patient spent in hospice care. The allocation for patient transfers cannot be
determined until a patient dies. As the number of days a patient spends in hospice is based on
a future event, this allocation process may take several years. Therefore, we use only
first-time Medicare admissions in our estimate of the Medicare Cap billing limitation. This
method assumes that credit received for patients who transfer into our program will be offset by
credit lost from patients who transfer out of our program. The amount we record is our best
estimate of the liability as of the date of the financial statements but could change as more
patient information becomes available.
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded pretax charges in continuing
operations of $242,000 and $3.9 million, respectively, for the estimated Medicare cap liability.
The amount recorded in 2007 relates primarily to retroactive billings for prior-measurement
periods due to patients who transferred between multiple hospice providers.
SALES TAX
The Roto-Rooter segment collects sales tax from customers when required by state and
federal laws. We record the amount of sales tax collected net in the accompanying consolidated
statement of income.
GUARANTEES
In the normal course of business, we enter into various guarantees and indemnifications in
our relationships with customers and others. These arrangements include guarantees of services
for periods ranging from one day to one year and product satisfaction guarantees. Our
experience indicates guarantees and indemnifications do not materially impact our financial
condition or results of operations. Based on our experience, no liability for guarantees has
been recorded as of December 31, 2007 or 2006.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation) includes salaries, wages
and benefits of service providers and field personnel, material costs, medical supplies and
equipment, pharmaceuticals, insurance costs, service
vehicle costs and other expenses directly related to providing service revenues or generating
sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, wages, stock option
expense and benefits of selling, marketing and administrative employees, advertising expenses,
communications and branch telephone expenses, office rent and operating costs, legal, banking
and professional fees and other administrative costs.
9
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
ADVERTISING
We expense the production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place.
The costs of yellow page listings are expensed when the directories are placed in circulation.
These directories are generally in circulation for approximately one year, at which point they
are replaced by the publisher with a new directory. We generally pay for directory placement
assuming it is in circulation for one year. If the directory is in circulation for less than or
greater than one year, we receive a credit or additional billing, as necessary. We do not
control the timing of when a new directory is placed in circulation. Other advertising costs
are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense in continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007, was $26.0 million (2006 $23.3 million; 2005 $21.2 million).
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital
stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive impact of our outstanding
stock options and nonvested stock awards. Stock options whose exercise price is greater than
the average market price of our stock are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share.
Diluted earnings per share may be impacted in future periods as the result of the issuance
of our $200 million Notes and related purchased call options and sold warrants, as described in
Note 2. Under Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible
Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share and EITF 90-19, Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option
to Settle for Cash Upon Conversion we will not include any shares related to the Notes in our
calculation of diluted earnings per share until our average stock price for a quarter exceeds
the conversion price of $80.73. We would then include in our diluted earnings per share
calculation those shares issuable using the treasury stock method. The amount of shares
issuable is based upon the amount by which the average stock price for the quarter exceeds the
conversion price. The purchased call option does not impact the calculation of diluted earnings
per share, as it is always anti-dilutive. The sold warrants become dilutive when our average
stock price for a quarter exceeds the strike price of the warrant.
The following table provides examples of how changes in our stock price impact the number
of shares that would be included in our diluted earnings per share calculation. It also shows
the impact on the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes and settlement of the
purchased call options and sold warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Treasury |
|
Shares Due |
|
Incremental |
|
|
Underlying 1.875% |
|
|
|
|
|
Method |
|
to the Company |
|
Shares Issued by |
Share |
|
Convertible |
|
Warrant |
|
Incremental |
|
under Notes |
|
the Company |
Price |
|
Notes |
|
Shares |
|
Shares (a) |
|
Hedges |
|
upon Conversion (b) |
$80.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$90.73 |
|
|
273,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,061 |
|
|
|
(273,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$100.73 |
|
|
491,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491,905 |
|
|
|
(491,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$110.73 |
|
|
671,222 |
|
|
|
118,359 |
|
|
|
789,581 |
|
|
|
(671,222 |
) |
|
|
118,359 |
|
$120.73 |
|
|
820,833 |
|
|
|
313,764 |
|
|
|
1,134,597 |
|
|
|
(820,833 |
) |
|
|
313,764 |
|
$130.73 |
|
|
947,556 |
|
|
|
479,274 |
|
|
|
1,426,830 |
|
|
|
(947,556 |
) |
|
|
479,274 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of incremental shares that must be included in the calculation of fully diluted shares
under U.S. GAAP. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents the number of incremental shares to be issued by the Company upon conversion of the 1.875%
Convertible Notes, assuming concurrent settlement of the note hedges and warrants. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, revised (SFAS 123(R)) which establishes accounting for stock-based
compensation for employees. Under SFAS
123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of
the award and recognized as expense over the employees requisite service period on a
straight-line basis. We previously applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and
provided the pro-forma disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123. We elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided by SFAS 123(R).
Accordingly, we have not restated previously reported financial statement amounts. Other than
certain reclassifications, there was no material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) in 2006.
10
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
INSURANCE ACCRUALS
For our Roto-Rooter segment and Corporate Office, we self-insure for all casualty insurance
claims (workers compensation, auto liability and general liability). As a result, we closely
monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the appropriate
level of accrual for self-insured claims. Our third-party administrator (TPA) processes and
reviews claims on a monthly basis. Currently, our exposure on any single claim is capped at
$500,000. In developing our estimates, we accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10
years to calculate loss development factors (LDF) by insurance coverage type. LDFs are
applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate potential liability for known and unknown
claims for each open policy year. LDFs are updated annually. Because this methodology relies
heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is whether the historical claims are an accurate
predictor of future claims exposure. The risk also exists that certain claims have been
incurred and not reported on a timely basis. To mitigate these risks, in conjunction with our
TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation of data and compare claims trends
with the industry experience of our TPA.
For the VITAS segment, we self-insure for workers compensation claims. Currently, VITAS
exposure on any single claim is capped at $500,000. For VITAS self-insurance accruals for
workers compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our
other business units.
Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for
amounts exceeding our stop loss limits. Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are
recorded as accounts receivable.
TAXES ON INCOME
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets
are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and
deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary
differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their
tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on
the date of enactment.
We are subject to income taxes in Canada, U.S. Federal and most state jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes. On January 1,
2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109, which prescribes a comprehensive model to
recognize, measure, present and disclose in financial statements uncertain tax positions taken
or expected to be taken on a tax return. Upon adoption of FIN 48, our financial statements
reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain positions assuming the taxing
authorities full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises
disclosure requirements and introduces an annual, tabular roll-forward of the unrecognized tax
benefits. The cumulative effect upon adoption of FIN 48 was to reduce our accrual for uncertain
tax positions by approximately $4.7 million, which has been recorded in retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Disclosures of aftertax expenses and
adjustments are based on estimates of the effective income tax rates for the applicable
segments.
RECENT ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R) Business Combinations (revised
2007) (SFAS 141(R)), which changes certain aspects of the accounting for business
combinations. This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the
purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be
identified for each business combination. SFAS 141(R) modifies existing accounting guidance in
the areas of deal and restructuring costs, acquired contingencies, contingent consideration, in-
process research and development, accounting for subsequent tax adjustments and assessing the
valuation date. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. There will be no
impact on our financial statements as a result of the adoption of SFAS 141(R), however our
accounting for all business combinations after adoption will comply with the new standard.
11
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which requires
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by others to be clearly identified, labeled and
presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity but separate from the parent companys
equity. SFAS 160 also affects the accounting requirements when the parent company either
purchases a higher ownership interest or deconsolidates the equity investment. This Statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An
entity may not apply it before that date. We currently do not have non-controlling interests in
our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits an entity to measure certain
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value
option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each reporting date. The fair
value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with a few exceptions, as long
as it is applied to the entire instrument. The fair value election is irrevocable unless a new
election date occurs. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that
begins after November 15, 2007. There will be no impact on our financial condition and results
of operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS 159.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
157), which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a
fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). It sets a common definition of fair value to be used throughout GAAP. The new
standard is designed to make the measurement of fair value more consistent and comparable and
improve disclosures about those measures. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. There will be no impact on our
financial condition and results of operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS 157. We are
currently evaluating the impact SFAS 157 will have on our footnote disclosures.
2. Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit
A summary of our long-term debt follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Convertible notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Term loan due 2007-2012 |
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate notes due 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
224,831 |
|
|
|
150,540 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(10,162 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
214,669 |
|
|
$ |
150,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average interest rate for our long-term debt was 4.4% and 8.3% for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
2007 REFINANCING
On May 2, 2007, we entered into a new senior secured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase
Bank (the 2007 Facility) to replace our existing credit facility. The 2007 Facility includes
a $100 million term loan, a $175 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million expansion
feature. The facility has a 5-year maturity with principal payments on the term loan due
quarterly and on the revolving credit facility due at maturity. Interest is payable quarterly
at a floating rate equal to our choice of various indices plus a specified margin based on our
leverage ratio. The interest rate at the inception of the agreement was LIBOR plus 0.875%. In
connection with replacing our existing credit facility, we wrote-off approximately $2.3 million
in deferred debt costs. This write-off has been recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt in
the accompanying statement of income.
On May 4, 2007, we used the proceeds from the 2007 Facility to fund the redemption of our
$150 million 8.75% Senior Notes due 2011. The redemption was made pursuant to the terms of the
indenture at a price of 104.375% plus accrued but unpaid interest. In connection with the
redemption, we wrote-off approximately $4.8 million in deferred debt costs. The premium payment
of $6.6 million and the write-off of deferred debt costs have been recorded as loss on
extinguishment of debt in the accompanying statement of income.
12
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
On May 8, 2007, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (the Initial Purchasers) for issuance and sale of $180 million
in aggregate principal amount of our 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 (the Notes). On
May 9, 2007, the Initial Purchasers exercised an over-allotment option to purchase an additional
$20 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes. On May 14, 2007, a total of $200 million in
aggregate principal amount of the Notes were sold to the Initial Purchasers at a price of $1,000
per Note, less an underwriting fee of $27.50 per Note. The Notes are to be resold by the Initial
Purchasers pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act).
We received approximately $194 million in net proceeds from the sale of the Notes after
paying underwriting fees, legal and other expenses. Proceeds from the offering were used to
purchase treasury shares of our stock, as discussed in Note 22 and to pay down a portion of the
2007 Facility. We pay interest on the Notes on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning
on November 15, 2007. The Notes mature on May 15, 2014. The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured
senior basis by each of our subsidiaries that are a borrower or a guarantor under any senior
credit facility, as defined in the Indenture. The Notes are convertible, under certain
circumstances, into our Capital Stock at a conversion rate of 12.3874 shares per $1,000
principal amount of Notes. This conversion rate is equivalent to an initial conversion price of
approximately $80.73 per share. Prior to March 1, 2014, holders may convert their Notes under
certain circumstances. On and after March 1, 2014, the Notes will be convertible at any time
prior to the close of business three days prior to the stated maturity date of the Notes. Upon
conversion of a Note, if the conversion value is $1,000 or less, holders will receive cash equal
to the lesser of $1,000 or the conversion value of the number of shares of our Capital Stock. If
the conversion value exceeds $1,000, in addition to this, holders will receive shares of our
Capital Stock for the excess amount. The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants that
upon certain events of default, including without limitation, failure to pay when due any
principal amount, a fundamental change or certain cross defaults in other agreements or
instruments, occurring and continuing; either the trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate
principal amount of the Notes may declare the principal of the Notes and any accrued and unpaid
interest through the date of such declaration immediately due and payable. In the case of
certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency relating to any significant subsidiary or to us, the
principal amount of the Notes and accrued interest automatically becomes due and payable.
Pursuant to the guidance in EITF 90-19, EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Instruments
Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock and EITF 01-6 The Meaning of
Indexed to a Companys Own Stock, the Notes are accounted for as convertible debt in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the embedded options within the Notes have not been
accounted for as separate derivatives.
We, our subsidiary guarantors and the Initial Purchasers also entered into a Registration
Rights Agreement (the RRA) dated May 14, 2007. Pursuant to the RRA, we agreed to, no later
than the 120th day after May 14, 2007, file a shelf registration statement covering resale of
the Notes and the Capital Stock issuable upon conversion pursuant to Rule 415 under the
Securities Act. On August 17, 2007, we filed a shelf registration statement, that became
immediately effective, to register the Notes and Capital Stock issuable upon conversion.
On May 8, 2007, we entered into a purchased call transaction and a warrant transaction
(written call) with JPMorgan Chase, National Association and Citibank, N.A. (the
Counterparties). The purchased call options cover approximately 2,477,000 shares of our
Capital Stock, which under most circumstances represents the maximum number of shares of Capital
Stock that underlie the Notes. Concurrently with entering into the purchased call options, we
entered into warrant transactions with each of the Counterparties. Pursuant to the warrant
transactions, we sold to the Counterparties warrants to purchase in the aggregate approximately
2,477,000 shares of our Capital Stock. In most cases, the sold warrants may not be exercised
prior to the maturity of the Notes.
The purchased call options and sold warrants are separate contracts with the
Counterparties, are not part of the terms of the Notes and do not affect the rights of holders
under the Notes. A holder of the Notes will not have any rights with respect to the purchased
call options or the sold warrants. The purchased call options are expected to reduce the
potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes if the market value per share of the Capital
Stock at the time of exercise is greater than approximately $80.73, which corresponds to the
initial conversion price of the Notes. The sold warrants have an exercise price of $105.44 and
are expected to result in some dilution should the price of our Capital Stock exceed this
exercise price.
Our net cost for these transactions was approximately $27.3 million. Pursuant to EITF
00-19 and EITF 01-6, the purchased call option and the sold warrants are accounted for as equity
transactions. Therefore, our net cost was recorded as a decrease in shareholders equity in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
13
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
OTHER
Other long-term debt has arisen from loans in connection with acquisitions of various
businesses and properties. Interest rates range from 5% to 8%, and the obligations are due on
various dates through December 2009.
Since May 2007, we have repaid $75.5 million of the $100 million term note under the 2007
Facility using cash on hand. Of the amount paid, $68.0 million represents a prepayment. The
following is a schedule by year of required long-term debt payments as of December 31, 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
10,162 |
|
2009 |
|
|
10,169 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
224,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007 and 2006, interest totaling $951,000 and $751,000, respectively, was
capitalized. Summarized below are the total amounts of interest paid during the years ended
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
15,466 |
|
2006 |
|
|
16,462 |
|
2005 |
|
|
19,268 |
|
DEBT COVENANTS
Collectively, the 2007 Facility and the Notes require us to meet certain restrictive
financial covenants, in addition to non-financial covenants, including maximum leverage ratios,
minimum fixed charge coverage and consolidated net worth ratios, limits on operating leases and
minimum asset value limits. We are in compliance with all debt covenants, financial and
non-financial, as of December 31, 2007. We have issued $30.1 million in standby letters of
credit as of December 31, 2007, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce
our available credit under the revolving credit agreement. As of December 31, 2007, we have
approximately $144.9 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down
under our revolving credit facility, excluding the expansion feature.
3. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
We provide employees the opportunity to acquire our stock through a number of plans, as
follows:
|
|
|
We have six stock incentive plans under which 10,700,000 shares can be issued to
key employees through a grant of stock awards and/or options to purchase shares. The
Compensation/Incentive Committee (CIC) of the Board of Directors administers these
plans. All options granted under these plans provide for a purchase price equal to
the market value of the stock at the date of grant. The latest plan, covering a total
of 3,000,000 shares, was adopted in May 2006 and amended in August 2006. The plans
are not qualified, restricted or incentive plans under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
The terms of each plan differ slightly, however, stock options issued under the plans
generally have a maximum term of 10 years. Under one plan, adopted in 1999, up to
500,000 shares may be issued to employees who are not our officers or directors. |
|
|
|
|
In May 2002, our shareholders approved the adoption of the Executive Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP) covering our officers and key employees. The CIC periodically
approves a pool of shares to be awarded based on stock price hurdles, EBITDA targets
and a discretionary component for the LTIP. |
14
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
The current stock price hurdles were established in 2006, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price |
|
Shares to be |
Hurdle |
|
Issued |
$62.00 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
$68.00 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
$75.00 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stock price hurdles must be achieved during 30 trading days out of any 60 trading day
period during the three years ending May 15, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, we met the cumulative EBITDA target established in 2004 and on March 9,
2007 the CIC approved a stock grant of 100,000 shares and the related allocation to
participants. The pretax cost of the stock grant was $5.4 million and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement
of income. |
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, the CIC approved a pool of shares to be awarded based on new EBITDA targets.
The participants of the LTIP may be awarded 80,000 shares of our capital stock if we
attain adjusted EBITDA of either $465 million for the three-year period beginning January
1, 2007, or $604 million for the four-year period beginning January 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
In June 2007, we met the $62.00 per share stock price hurdle and on June 27, 2007, the
CIC approved a stock grant of 22,200 shares and the related allocation to participants.
The pretax cost of the stock grant was $1.6 million and is included in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the accompanying statement of income. |
|
|
|
|
The pretax cost of the LTIP was $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. There
were no awards made under the LTIP during fiscal 2006. As of December 31, 2007, there
are 22,800 shares issuable from the approved discretionary pool. |
|
|
|
|
We maintain an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP allows eligible
participants to purchase our shares through payroll deductions at current market
value. We pay administrative and broker fees associated with the ESPP. Shares
purchased for the ESPP are purchased on the open market and credited directly to
participants accounts. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), the ESPP is
non-compensatory. |
In March 2005, the Board of Directors approved immediate vesting of all unvested stock
options to avoid recognizing approximately $951,000 of pretax expense that would have been
charged to income upon adoption of SFAS 123R. The $215,000 pretax charge for accelerating the
vesting of these options is included in operating income for the year ended December 31, 2005.
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded $1.2 million and $1.3 million,
respectively, in amortization expense in the accompanying statement of income for stock-based
compensation related to the amortization of restricted stock awards granted. For the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded $4.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in
selling, general and administrative expenses for stock-based compensation related to stock
options granted. There were no capitalized stock-based compensation costs as of December 31,
2007.
15
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
The pro-forma disclosure as required by SFAS No. 123 for the year ended December 31, 2005
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
Add: stock-based compensation expense included in net income as reported, net of income taxes |
|
|
4,314 |
|
Deduct: total stock-based compensation determined under a fair value method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(8,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income |
|
$ |
31,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
The above pro-forma data were calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation method to
value our stock options granted. Key assumptions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant-date
fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
12.43 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
5 yrs. |
Annual dividend rate |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $3.7 million of total unrecognized compensation
costs related to non-vested stock awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.9 years. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $11.7 million of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to non-vested stock options are expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.2 years.
The following table summarizes stock option and award activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Stock-based compensation shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
1,660,522 |
|
|
$ |
30.53 |
|
|
|
134,540 |
|
|
$ |
30.33 |
|
Granted |
|
|
470,600 |
|
|
|
67.96 |
|
|
|
174,800 |
|
|
|
52.35 |
|
Exercised/Vested |
|
|
(236,473 |
) |
|
|
24.24 |
|
|
|
(152,546 |
) |
|
|
48.51 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
42.41 |
|
|
|
(1,402 |
) |
|
|
29.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,887,549 |
|
|
$ |
40.60 |
|
|
|
155,392 |
|
|
$ |
37.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,173,236 |
|
|
$ |
27.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average contractual life of outstanding and exercisable options was 5.9 years
at December 31, 2007.
16
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007, were in the following exercise price ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Intrinsic |
Exercise Price Range |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Value |
$16.10 to $35.00
|
|
|
795,282 |
|
|
$ |
20.15 |
|
|
$ |
28,415,426 |
|
$35.00 to $67.96
|
|
|
1,092,267 |
|
|
$ |
55.50 |
|
|
$ |
415,061 |
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 was $7.8 million, $14.7 million and $28.3 million, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of stock options that were vested as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$33.5 million, $16.8 million and $45.4 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
stock awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $8.5 million,
$1.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The total cash received from employees as a result
of employee stock option exercises for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $2.5
million, $3.9 million and $12.3 million, respectively. In connection with these exercises, the
excess tax benefits realized for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, were
$3.2 million, $5.6 million and $10.8 million, respectively. We settle employee stock options
with newly issued shares.
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model,
consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and our prior period pro-forma disclosure of net income
including stock-based compensation expense. We determine expected term, volatility, dividend
yield and forfeiture rate based on our historical experience. We believe that historical
experience is the best indicator of these factors. We granted 470,600 stock options on May 21,
2007, pursuant to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. For purposes of determining the key
assumptions and the related fair value of the options granted, we analyzed the participants of
the LTIP separately from the other stock option recipients. The assumptions we used to value
the 2006 and 2007 grants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
LTIP |
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP |
|
|
|
|
Participants |
|
All Others |
|
Participants |
|
All Others |
Stock price on date of issuance |
|
$ |
67.96 |
|
|
$ |
67.96 |
|
|
$ |
51.76 |
|
|
$ |
51.76 |
|
Grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
25.18 |
|
|
$ |
21.87 |
|
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
|
$ |
16.47 |
|
Number of options granted |
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
150,600 |
|
|
|
262,750 |
|
|
|
107,700 |
|
Expected term (years) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Risk free rate of return |
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
5.19 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
4. Segments and Nature of the Business
Our segments include the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment. Relative contributions
of each segment to service revenues and sales were 69% and 31%, respectively, in both 2007 and
2006. The vast majority of our service revenues and sales from continuing operations are
generated from business within the United States.
The reportable segments have been defined along service lines, which is consistent with the
way the businesses are managed. In determining reportable segments, the Roto-Rooter Services and
Roto-Rooter Franchising and Products operating units of the Roto-Rooter segment have been
aggregated on the basis of possessing similar operating and economic characteristics. The
characteristics of these operating segments and the basis for aggregation are reviewed annually.
Accordingly, the reportable segments are defined as follows:
|
|
|
The VITAS segment provides hospice services for patients with severe, life-limiting
illnesses. This type of care is aimed at making the terminally ill patients end of
life as comfortable and pain-free as possible. Hospice care is typically available to
patients who have been initially certified or re-certified as terminally ill (i.e., a
prognosis of six months or less) by their attending physician, if any, and the hospice
physician. VITAS offers |
17
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
all levels of hospice care in a given market, including routine home care, inpatient care
and continuous care. Over 90% of VITAS revenues are derived through Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursement programs. |
|
|
|
|
The Roto-Rooter segment provides repair and maintenance services to residential and
commercial accounts using the Roto-Rooter registered service mark. Such services
include plumbing and sewer, drain and pipe cleaning. They are delivered through
company-owned and operated territories, independent contractor-operated territories
and franchised locations. This segment also manufactures and sells products and
equipment used to provide such services. |
|
|
|
|
We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing
income and expense not directly related to either segment as Corporate. Corporate
administrative expense includes the stewardship, accounting and reporting, legal, tax
and other costs of operating a publicly held corporation. Corporate investing and
financing income and expenses include the costs and income associated with corporate
debt and investment arrangements. Historically, we allocated stock-based compensation
expense to the segment that employs its recipient. In connection with our adoption of
SFAS 123(R) in 2006, we reassessed the classification within our business segments of
stock-based compensation expense and determined that our chief decision maker analyzes
stock-based compensation as a corporate expense. Accordingly, all stock-based
compensation expense for 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been included as a corporate expense
in the chart below. |
Segment data for our continuing operations are set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues by Type of Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine homecare |
|
$ |
546,872 |
|
|
$ |
492,012 |
|
|
$ |
426,380 |
|
Continuous care |
|
|
115,801 |
|
|
|
121,096 |
|
|
|
106,417 |
|
General inpatient |
|
|
92,995 |
|
|
|
89,882 |
|
|
|
85,836 |
|
Medicare cap |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
755,426 |
|
|
|
699,092 |
|
|
|
618,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sewer and drain cleaning |
|
|
151,111 |
|
|
|
144,758 |
|
|
|
134,338 |
|
Plumbing repair and maintenance |
|
|
143,021 |
|
|
|
129,048 |
|
|
|
118,783 |
|
Independent contractors |
|
|
22,070 |
|
|
|
19,169 |
|
|
|
18,070 |
|
HVAC repair and maintenance |
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
Other products and services |
|
|
24,501 |
|
|
|
23,699 |
|
|
|
22,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
344,632 |
|
|
|
319,495 |
|
|
|
297,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service revenues and sales |
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
$ |
915,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aftertax Segment Earnings/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
59,833 |
|
|
$ |
48,418 |
|
|
$ |
33,505 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
38,851 |
|
|
|
32,454 |
|
|
|
27,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
98,684 |
|
|
|
80,872 |
|
|
|
61,131 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(35,909 |
) |
|
|
(23,150 |
) |
|
|
(24,903 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(7,071 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
7,405 |
|
|
$ |
5,443 |
|
|
$ |
2,792 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,775 |
|
|
|
9,525 |
|
|
|
5,183 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(12,247 |
) |
|
|
(9,326 |
) |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
3,304 |
|
|
$ |
2,691 |
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
16,909 |
|
|
|
20,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
11,244 |
|
|
$ |
17,468 |
|
|
$ |
21,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
35,722 |
|
|
$ |
28,705 |
|
|
$ |
20,097 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
23,856 |
|
|
|
18,748 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
59,578 |
|
|
|
47,453 |
|
|
|
36,145 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(20,515 |
) |
|
|
(14,891 |
) |
|
|
(17,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision |
|
$ |
39,063 |
|
|
$ |
32,562 |
|
|
$ |
18,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
529,752 |
|
|
$ |
517,112 |
|
|
$ |
523,494 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
185,982 |
|
|
|
185,580 |
|
|
|
179,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
715,734 |
|
|
|
702,692 |
|
|
|
702,557 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
56,579 |
|
|
|
84,890 |
|
|
|
123,725 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,705 |
|
|
|
12,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable assets |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
$ |
793,287 |
|
|
$ |
839,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to Long-Lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
20,435 |
|
|
$ |
14,419 |
|
|
$ |
24,462 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
10,268 |
|
|
|
7,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
29,776 |
|
|
|
24,687 |
|
|
|
32,400 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total additions to
long-lived assets |
|
$ |
29,969 |
|
|
$ |
24,824 |
|
|
$ |
32,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
15,430 |
|
|
$ |
12,669 |
|
|
$ |
11,504 |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
8,419 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23,849 |
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
|
|
19,865 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
25,388 |
|
|
$ |
22,030 |
|
|
$ |
21,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets from continuing operations was $4.0
million for each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
following is a schedule by year of projected amortization expense for definite-lived intangible
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,002 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,996 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,197 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,197 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,453 |
|
19
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
The balance in identifiable intangible assets comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referral networks |
|
$ |
21,140 |
|
|
$ |
(10,650 |
) |
|
$ |
10,490 |
|
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
|
(5,624 |
) |
|
|
3,129 |
|
Customer lists |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal definite-lived intangibles |
|
|
31,122 |
|
|
|
(17,245 |
) |
|
|
13,877 |
|
VITAS trade name |
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
82,422 |
|
|
$ |
(17,245 |
) |
|
$ |
65,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referral networks |
|
$ |
21,142 |
|
|
$ |
(7,858 |
) |
|
$ |
13,284 |
|
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
8,751 |
|
|
|
(4,433 |
) |
|
|
4,318 |
|
Customer lists |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal definite-lived intangibles |
|
|
31,116 |
|
|
|
(13,201 |
) |
|
|
17,915 |
|
VITAS trade name |
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
82,416 |
|
|
$ |
(13,201 |
) |
|
$ |
69,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $6.1 million increase in goodwill during 2006 and 2007 relates to business combinations
within the Roto-Rooter segment and adjustments to purchase price allocations.
As discussed in Note 23, in 2006 we changed the date of our annual goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis to October 1. For all reporting units
included in continuing operations, the impairment tests indicated that our goodwill and VITAS
trade name are not impaired. For the purpose of impairment testing, we consider the reporting
units to be VITAS, Roto-Rooter Services (plumbing and drain cleaning services) and Roto-Rooter
Franchising and Products (franchising and manufacturing and sale of plumbing and drain cleaning
products). As further discussed in Note 7, VITAS sold its Phoenix program in November 2006.
Prior to that sale, we determined that the acquired referral network was impaired and recorded a
pretax impairment loss of $2.2 million during September 2006.
6. Other Expenses
Other expenses from continuing operations include the following pretax charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Costs related to class action litigation |
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
17,350 |
|
Adjustments to transaction-related costs
of the VITAS acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
16,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
7. Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations comprise (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Phoenix (2006): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
(9,117 |
) |
|
$ |
2,627 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(5,472 |
) |
|
|
1,477 |
|
Gain on disposal, net of income tax expense of $391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service America (2004): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
576 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
335 |
|
(Loss)/gain on disposal, net of income tax benefit of $165
and $14,232 respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to accruals of operations discontinued in prior years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement costs and other accruals (2002) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,246 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Environmental accruals (1991) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable and other accruals
(2001) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,412 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
All other income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,167 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
$ |
(7,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, our Board of Directors approved and we announced our intention to exit
the hospice market in Phoenix, Arizona. Although we were successful in growing admissions of
terminally ill patients, our growth was primarily patients who reside in assisted living
settings. Patients residing in these types of facilities tend to exit curative care and enter
into hospice care relatively early in their terminal diagnosis. The Medicare Cap limits payment
for hospice care when a significant portion of the patient census enters into hospice early in
their terminal diagnosis. Although we have, on average, relatively short average and median
lengths of stay in the majority of our programs, all programs are measured separately and cannot
be considered in the aggregate of programs under common control. Due to these billing
limitations, we experienced significant operating losses at this program. As a result of our
announcement, we performed impairment tests of our long-lived assets of the Phoenix operation as
of September 30, 2006, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge of $2.4
million was recorded for the referral network intangible asset and fixed assets during the third
quarter of 2006. The sale was completed in November 2006. The acquiring corporation purchased
the substantial majority of assets of the Phoenix program for $2.5 million. In October 2007, we
received notification from the Federal governments fiscal intermediary regarding our Medicare
cap liabilities related to the 2006 measurement period. The notification revealed that we were
over accrued at our discontinued Phoenix operation by $1.9 million. We have recorded the
reversal of this over accrual and its related tax effects in discontinued operations during the
year ended December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, we have $500,000 accrued for potential
retroactive billings related to the Medicare Cap for Phoenix.
On September 28, 2006, we announced a preliminary settlement in regard to litigation
related to the 2002 divestiture of our Patient Care business segment. Prior to the settlement,
we had a long-term receivable from Patient Care of $12.5 million. We also had current accounts
receivable from Patient Care for the post-closing balance sheet valuation and for expenses paid
by us after closing on Patient Cares behalf of $3.4 million. We were in litigation with
Patient Care over the collection of these current amounts and their allegations that our
acquisition of VITAS violated a non-compete
21
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
covenant in the sales agreement. We agreed to
forgive $1.2 million of the current receivable related to the post-closing balance sheet
valuation and convert the remaining amount into debt secured by a promissory note with the same
terms as the $12.5 million long-term receivable. We incurred additional costs related to the
settlement of $1.1 million for additional insurance and legal costs related to workers
compensation claims incurred prior to the sale. The aftertax charge related to these amounts of
$1.5 million has been recorded as discontinued operations in 2006.
In December 2007, the parties amended the terms of the long-term notes receivable from
Patient Care. We agreed to waive the prepayment penalty provisions in the notes provided that
Patient Care paid $5 million of principal on or before December 31, 2007, and the remaining
outstanding principal on or before March 31, 2008. On December 31, 2007, we received a
principal payment of $5 million from Patient Care. Subsequent to year-end, we received
principal payments of $5.7 million from Patient Care.
We also have a warrant to purchase 2% of Patient Cares common stock that we recorded as a
$1.4 million investment. As a result of financial information received in 2006, we determined
that the value of the warrants was permanently impaired and recorded a pretax impairment charge
of $1.4 million. This charge is included in income from continuing operations on the
consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In December 2004, the Board of Directors authorized the discontinuance of our Service
America segment through an asset sale to employees of Service America. The disposal was
completed in May 2005. Our decision to dispose of Service America, which provides
major-appliance and heating/air conditioning repair, maintenance and replacement services, was
based on declining operating results and projected operating losses. The acquiring corporation
purchased the substantial majority of Service Americas assets in exchange for assuming
substantially all of Service Americas liabilities. The loss on disposal of Service America in
2005 arises from the finalization of asset and liability values and related tax benefits
resulting from the consummation of the sale transaction.
During 2006, we increased our accrual for environmental liabilities related to the disposal
of DuBois Chemical, Inc., by $1.2 million. The adjustment made by us is based on an assessment
by our environmental attorney, a preliminary settlement agreement with respect to one site and
ongoing discussions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, the accrual for our estimated liability for potential environmental cleanup and related
costs arising from the sale of DuBois amounted to $1.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
Of the 2007 balance, $826,000 is included in other current liabilities and $900,000 is included
in other liabilities (long-term). We are contingently liable for additional DuBois-related
environmental cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million. On the basis of a
continuing evaluation of the potential liability, we believe it is not probable this additional
liability will be paid. Accordingly, no provision for this contingent liability has been
recorded. The potential liability is not insured, and the recorded liability does not assume
the recovery of insurance proceeds. Also, the environmental liability has not been discounted
because it is not possible to reliably project the timing of payments. We believe that any
adjustments to our recorded liability will not materially adversely affect our financial
position or results of operations.
Revenues generated by discontinued operations comprise (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Service America |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,716 |
|
Phoenix |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
10,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
$ |
21,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, other current liabilities include accruals of $1.3 million and other
liabilities (long-term) include accruals of $1.2 million for costs related to discontinued
operations. The estimated timing of payments of these liabilities follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
2009 |
|
|
963 |
|
2010 |
|
|
208 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
8. Business Combinations
During 2007, we completed one business combination within the Roto-Rooter segment for $1.1
million in cash to increase our market penetration in Burlington, Vermont. We made no
acquisitions within the VITAS segment during 2007.
During 2006, we completed three business combinations within the Roto-Rooter segment for an
aggregate purchase price of $4.1 million in cash. We made no acquisitions within the VITAS
segment during 2006. The Roto-Rooter acquisitions were completed mainly to increase our market
penetration in Erie, Pennsylvania; Tyler, Texas; and Lexington,
Kentucky.
During 2005, we completed one business combination within the Roto-Rooter segment and two
within the VITAS segment for an aggregate purchase price of $6.2 million in cash. The
acquisitions were completed mainly to increase our market penetration. The VITAS businesses
acquired provide hospice services in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
areas and the Roto-Rooter business acquired provides drain cleaning and plumbing services using
the Roto-Rooter name in Greensboro, North Carolina.
The unaudited pro-forma results of operations, assuming purchase business combinations
completed in 2007 and 2006 were completed on January 1, 2006, do not materially impact the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations of each of the above
business combinations are included in our results of operations from the date of the respective
acquisition. The allocations of purchase price are immaterial to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
9. Other IncomeNet
Other incomenet from continuing operations comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
3,304 |
|
|
$ |
2,691 |
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
Gain on trading investments of employee benefit trust |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
$ |
4,125 |
|
|
$ |
4,648 |
|
|
$ |
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes comprises the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
26,458 |
|
|
$ |
21,955 |
|
|
$ |
21,201 |
|
U.S. state and local |
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal, state and local |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,063 |
|
|
$ |
32,562 |
|
|
$ |
18,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current U.S. federal |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
(4,175 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,497 |
) |
Current U.S. state and local |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
Deferred U.S. federal, state and local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
16,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
(4,608 |
) |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
A summary of the temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
26,557 |
|
|
$ |
27,248 |
|
Amortization of original issue discount |
|
|
18,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
State net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
52,814 |
|
|
|
34,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(33,928 |
) |
|
|
(32,162 |
) |
Accelerated tax depreciation |
|
|
(8,268 |
) |
|
|
(8,222 |
) |
Currents assets |
|
|
(1,651 |
) |
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
(44,157 |
) |
|
|
(42,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
8,657 |
|
|
$ |
(7,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other assets at December 31, 2007, are deferred income tax assets of $247,000 (
2006 $574,000). At December 31, 2007 and 2006, state net operating loss carryforwards were $
37.4 million and $29.0 million, respectively. These net operating losses will expire, in
varying amounts, between 2009 and 2026. Based on our history of operating earnings, we have
determined that our operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to ensure
realization of our deferred income tax assets. We believe no net operating losses will be lost
due to the continuity of business requirement.
The cumulative effect upon adoption of FIN 48 was to reduce our accrual for uncertain tax
positions by approximately $4.7 million, which has been recorded in retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. After adoption, we had
approximately $1.3 million in unrecognized tax benefits. The majority of this amount would
affect our effective tax rate, if recognized in a future period. The years ended December 31,
2004 and forward remain open for review for Federal income tax purposes. The earliest open year
relating to any of our material state jurisdictions is the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
During the next twelve months, we do not anticipate a material net change in unrecognized tax
benefits.
As permitted by FIN 48, we reclassified interest related to our accrual for uncertain tax
positions to separate interest accounts. We believe this change in accounting method is
preferable as it more accurately classifies the impact of interest in our consolidated
financial statements. As of December 31, 2007, we have approximately
$142,000 accrued in interest payable related to uncertain tax positions. These accruals are included in
other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Net interest expense
related to uncertain tax positions included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statement of income is not material.
A roll forward of the significant changes to our unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance after adoption January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits due to positions taken in 2007 |
|
|
178 |
|
Decrease due to settlement with taxing authorities |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Decrease due to expiration of statute of limitations |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
24
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
The difference between the actual income tax provision for continuing operations and the
income tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal tax rate is explained as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Income tax provision calculated using the statutory rate of 35% |
|
$ |
35,643 |
|
|
$ |
31,599 |
|
|
$ |
19,130 |
|
State and
local income taxes, less federal income tax effect |
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
Tax accrual adjustments |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(1,758 |
) |
|
|
(2,387 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
39,063 |
|
|
$ |
32,562 |
|
|
$ |
18,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized below are the total amounts of income taxes paid/(refunded) during the years
ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
24,345 |
|
2006 |
|
|
3,823 |
|
2005 |
|
|
9,923 |
|
Provision has not been made for additional taxes on $35.1 million of undistributed earnings
of our domestic subsidiaries. Should we elect to sell our interest in all of these businesses
rather than to effect a tax-free liquidation, additional taxes amounting to approximately $12.8
million would be incurred based on current income tax rates.
11. Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents
Included in accounts payable are cash overdrafts of $9.5 million and $10.6 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in repurchase agreements
directly with major commercial banks. We do not physically hold the collateral, but the term of
such repurchase agreements is less than 10 days. Investments of significant amounts are spread
among a number of banks and the amounts invested in each bank are varied constantly. Included
in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007, are cash equivalents in the amount of
$3.4 million (2006 $22.5 million). The cash equivalents at both dates consist of investments
in various money market funds and repurchase agreements yielding interest at a weighted average
rate of 2.8% in 2007 and 5.2% in 2006.
12. Properties and Equipment
A summary of properties and equipment follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
1,713 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
27,159 |
|
|
|
24,349 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
12,270 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
46,927 |
|
|
|
42,474 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
22,839 |
|
|
|
21,223 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
38,770 |
|
|
|
31,017 |
|
Projects under development |
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
14,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total properties and equipment |
|
|
163,152 |
|
|
|
147,247 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(88,639 |
) |
|
|
(77,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net properties and equipment |
|
$ |
74,513 |
|
|
$ |
70,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net book value of computer software at December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $7.6 million and
$8.1 million, respectively. Depreciation expense for computer software was $4.4 million, $4.0
million and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
25
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
13. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities comprised the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accrued legal settlements |
|
$ |
2,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
Accrued divestiture expenses |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
Accrued Medicare Cap estimate |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,191 |
|
|
|
14,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
13,929 |
|
|
$ |
22,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Pension and Retirement Plans
Retirement obligations under various plans cover substantially all full-time employees who
meet age and/or service eligibility requirements. The major plans providing retirement benefits
to our employees are defined contribution plans. Expenses charged to continuing operations for
our retirement and profit-sharing plans, ESOPs, excess benefit plans and other similar plans
comprise the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Compensation cost of ESOPs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
Pension, profit-sharing and other similar plans |
|
|
12,797 |
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,797 |
|
|
$ |
11,117 |
|
|
$ |
10,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on ESOP shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used for debt service |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have excess benefit plans for key employees whose participation in the qualified plans
is limited by U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act requirements. Benefits are determined
based on theoretical participation in the qualified plans. Benefits are only invested in mutual
funds, and participants are not permitted to diversify accumulated benefits in shares of our
stock. Trust assets invested in shares of our stock are included in treasury stock, and the
corresponding liability is included in a separate component of shareholders equity. At December
31, 2007, these trusts held 134,104 shares or $2.5 million of our stock (2006 133,315 shares
or $2.4 million). The diversified assets of our excess benefit and deferred compensation plans,
all of which are invested in either company-owned life insurance or various mutual funds,
totaled $29.4 million at December 31, 2007 (2006 $25.7 million).
15. Lease Arrangements
We have operating leases that cover our corporate office headquarters, various warehouse
and office facilities, office equipment and transportation equipment. The remaining terms of
these leases range from one year to nine years, and in most cases we expect that these leases
will be renewed or replaced by other leases in the normal course of business. We have no
significant capital leases as of December 31, 2007 or 2006.
The following is a summary of future minimum rental payments and sublease rentals to be
received under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable terms in excess of
one year at December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
15,010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
12,984 |
|
2010 |
|
|
9,105 |
|
2011 |
|
|
6,846 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,265 |
|
After 2012 |
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum rental payments |
|
|
54,635 |
|
Less: minimum sublease rentals |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net minimum rental payments |
|
$ |
54,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
26
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Total rental expense incurred under operating leases for continuing operations follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Total rental payments |
|
$ |
17,307 |
|
|
$ |
16,859 |
|
|
$ |
17,027 |
|
Less sublease rentals |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rental expense |
|
$ |
17,047 |
|
|
$ |
16,172 |
|
|
$ |
15,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions are used in estimating the fair value of each class
of our financial instruments:
|
|
|
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the
carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and
short-term nature of these instruments. |
|
|
|
|
The December 31, 2007 and 2006, carrying value of $9.7 million and $14.7 million,
respectively related to our investment in the note receivable due from Patient Care is
considered to be the best available indicator of fair value. |
|
|
|
|
For long-term debt, we calculated the fair value based either on market quotations
or discounted cash flow analysis. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt is
$210.5 million and $155.0 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
17. Earnings Per Share
The computation of earnings per share follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
Net Income |
|
For the Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
December 31, |
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
62,775 |
|
|
|
24,520 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
|
24,520 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings |
|
$ |
62,775 |
|
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
57,722 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings |
|
$ |
57,722 |
|
|
|
26,669 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
|
26,669 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
36,228 |
|
|
|
25,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
|
25,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings |
|
$ |
36,228 |
|
|
|
26,299 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
|
26,299 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, 290,096 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price during most of the
year. During 2006, 369,850 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their exercise prices were
greater than the average market price during most of the year. During 2005, there were no
options outstanding whose exercise price exceeded the average market price for the year.
27
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
18. Loans Receivable from Independent Contractors
At December 31, 2007, we had contractual arrangements with 61 independent contractors to
provide plumbing repair and drain cleaning services under sublicensing agreements using the
Roto-Rooter name in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada. The arrangements
give the independent contractors the right to conduct a plumbing and drain cleaning business
using the Roto-Rooter name in a specified territory in exchange for a royalty based on a
percentage of labor sales, generally approximately 40%. We also pay for yellow pages
advertising in these areas, provide certain capital equipment and provide operating manuals to
serve as resources for operating a plumbing and drain cleaning business. The contracts are
generally cancelable upon 90 days written notice (without cause) or upon a few days notice
(with cause). The independent contractors are responsible for running the businesses as they
believe best.
Our maximum exposure to loss from arrangements with our independent contractors at
December 31, 2007, is approximately $1.6 million (2006 $1.9 million). The exposure to loss is
mainly the result of loans provided to the independent contractors. In most cases, these loans
are partially secured by receivables and equipment owned by the independent contractor. The
interest rates on the loans range from zero to 8% per annum, and the remaining terms of the
loans range from 2.5 months to 5.4 years at December 31, 2007. During 2007, we recorded
revenues of $22.1 million (2006 $19.2 million; 2005 $18.1 million) and pretax profits of
$9.0 million (2006 $6.9 million; 2005 $6.0 million) from all of our independent contractors.
19. Litigation
Like other large California employers, our VITAS subsidiary faces allegations of purported
class-wide wage and hour violations. It was party to a class action lawsuit filed in the
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, in April of 2004 by Ann Marie Costa, Ana
Jimenez, Mariea Ruteaya and Gracetta Wilson (Costa). This case alleged failure to pay
overtime wages for hours worked off the clock on administrative tasks, including voicemail
retrieval, time entry, travel to and from work, and pager response. This case also alleged
VITAS failed to provide meal and break periods to a purported class of California nurses, home
health aides and licensed clinical social workers. The case also sought payment of penalties,
interest, and Plaintiffs attorney fees. VITAS contested these allegations. During 2006, we
reached a tentative settlement and on June 26, 2006, the court granted final approval of the
settlement ($19.9 million).
VITAS is party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California, Los
Angeles County, in September 2006 by Bernadette Santos, Keith Knoche and Joyce White (Santos).
This case, filed by the Costa case Plaintiffs counsel, makes similar allegations of failure to
pay overtime and failure to provide meal and rest periods to a purported class of California
admissions nurses, chaplains and sales representatives. The case likewise seeks payment of
penalties, interest and Plaintiffs attorney fees. VITAS contests these allegations. The
lawsuit is in its early stage and we are unable to estimate our potential liability, if any,
with respect to these allegations.
In April 2007, our Roto-Rooter subsidiary was named in a class action lawsuit filed in San
Mateo Superior Court by Stanley Ita (Ita) alleging class-wide wage and hour violations at one
California branch. This suit alleges failure to provide meal and break periods, credit for work
time beginning from the first call to dispatch rather than arrival at first assignment and
improper calculations of work time and overtime. The case sought payment of penalties, interest
and Plaintiffs attorney fees. After the suit was filed, we offered a settlement to the members
of the class and paid approximately $200,000. In January 2008, we agreed to a tentative
settlement with the remaining members of the class for approximately $1.8 million. The
tentative settlement is subject to court approval. The tentative settlement has been accrued in
the accompanying financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Regardless of outcome, defense of litigation adversely affects us through defense costs,
diversion of our time and related publicity. In the normal course of business, we are a party
to various claims and legal proceedings. We record a reserve for these matters when an adverse
outcome is probable and the amount of the potential liability is reasonably estimable.
28
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
20. OIG Investigation
In April 2005, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the Department of Health and
Human Services served VITAS with civil subpoenas relating to VITAS alleged failure to
appropriately bill Medicare and Medicaid for hospice services. As part of this investigation,
the OIG selected medical records for 320 past and current patients from VITAS three largest
programs for review. It also sought policies and procedures dating back to 1998 covering
admissions, certifications, recertifications and discharges. During the third quarter of 2005
and again in May 2006, the OIG requested additional information from us. The Court dismissed a
related qui tam complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida with
prejudice in July 2007. The plaintiffs are appealing this dismissal. Pretax expenses related
to complying with OIG requests have been immaterial in 2007. We incurred pretax expense related
to complying with OIG requests and defending the litigation of $1.1 million and $637,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The government continues to investigate the complaints allegations. We are unable to
predict the outcome of this matter or the impact, if any, that the investigation may have on our
business, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. Regardless of outcome,
responding to the subpoenas and defending the litigation can adversely affect us through defense
costs, diversion of our time and related publicity.
21. Related Party Transactions
In October 2004, VITAS entered into a pharmacy services agreement (Agreement) with
Omnicare, Inc. (OCR) whereby OCR provides specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its
hospice patients in geographical areas served by both VITAS and OCR. The Agreement has an
initial term of three years that renews automatically for one-year terms. Either party may
cancel the Agreement at the end of any term by giving written notice at least 90 days prior to
the end of said term. In June 2004, VITAS entered into a pharmacy services agreement with
excelleRx. The agreement has a one-year term and automatically renews unless either party
provides a 90-day written termination notice. Subsequent to June 2004, OCR acquired excelleRx.
Under both agreements, VITAS made purchases of $33.6 million, $30.4 million and $16.2 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and has accounts payable of
$445,000 and $4.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Mr. E. L. Hutton is non-executive Chairman of the Board and a director of the Company and
OCR. Mr. Joel F. Gemunder, President and Chief Executive Officer of OCR, Mr. Charles H. Erhart,
Jr. and Ms. Sandra Laney are directors of both OCR and the Company. Mr. Kevin J. McNamara,
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, is a director emeritus of OCR.
We believe that the terms of these agreements are no less favorable to VITAS than we could
negotiate with an unrelated party.
22. Capital Stock Transactions
On April 26, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a $150 million stock repurchase
program. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we repurchased 2,139,401 shares at a weighted
average cost per share of $59.77 under the April 2007 and July 2006 programs. For the year
ended December 31, 2006, we repurchased 433,580 shares at a weighted average cost per share of
$36.01 under the July 2006 and February 2000 programs.
On May 15, 2006, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation
increasing the number of authorized shares of capital stock from 40 million shares to 80 million shares.
On March 11, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 stock split in the form of a
100% stock dividend to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 22, 2005. This
stock split was paid May 11, 2005. Under Delaware law, the par value of the capital stock
remains $1 per share.
23. Change in Accounting Principle
Effective September 30, 2006, we changed the date of our annual goodwill impairment
analysis to October 1. Previously, we performed this annual goodwill impairment test on
December 31. We believe this change in accounting principle is preferable because the new date
coincides with the Federal governments fiscal year end of September 30 and therefore allows for
a better estimation of the Medicare related cash flows of our VITAS business. Medicare pays in
excess of 90% of VITAS revenue. Of the total goodwill recorded as of September 30, 2006,
approximately 75% is related to VITAS. Due to the Medicare Cap discussed above, October 1 is
when cash flows from our hospice programs are most predictable. The change in accounting
principle had no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
29
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
24. Guarantor Subsidiaries
Our 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes issued on May 14, 2007, are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on an unsecured, joint and severally liable basis by certain of our 100% owned
subsidiaries. The equity method has been used with respect to the parent companys (Chemed)
investment in subsidiaries. No consolidating adjustment column is presented for the condensed
consolidating statement of cash flow since there were no significant consolidating entries for
the periods presented. The following condensed, consolidating financial data presents the
composition of the parent company, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for the periods ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (in
thousands):
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
$ |
(1,584 |
) |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
101,843 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,113 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
42,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,925 |
) |
|
|
(38,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,596 |
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
13,964 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,212 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
9,521 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
47,838 |
|
|
|
129,860 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(38,316 |
) |
|
|
139,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,417 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
9,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,701 |
|
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation |
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
68,303 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,513 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,176 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,177 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,946 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,689 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12,658 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,411 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries Guarantor Subs |
|
|
500,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subs |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,455 |
|
|
$ |
710,740 |
|
|
$ |
36,391 |
|
|
$ |
(550,273 |
) |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
(1,236 |
) |
|
$ |
48,978 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,111 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,992 |
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
|
|
(38,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,162 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,221 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
36,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,337 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
35,505 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,072 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
10,486 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,085 |
|
|
|
169,239 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
(38,316 |
) |
|
|
152,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(23,174 |
) |
|
|
39,247 |
|
|
|
(10,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,802 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
214,500 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,669 |
|
Deferred compensation liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,149 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,512 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
364,349 |
|
|
|
500,288 |
|
|
|
11,669 |
|
|
|
(511,957 |
) |
|
|
364,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
575,455 |
|
|
$ |
710,740 |
|
|
$ |
36,391 |
|
|
$ |
(550,273 |
) |
|
$ |
772,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
25,258 |
|
|
$ |
(1,314 |
) |
|
$ |
5,330 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
91,065 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,086 |
|
Intercompany receivables |
|
|
84,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
Current deferred income taxes |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,789 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
112,281 |
|
|
|
128,016 |
|
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
|
(84,784 |
) |
|
|
162,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust |
|
|
12,214 |
|
|
|
13,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,713 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
14,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,701 |
|
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation |
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
62,023 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,140 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,213 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,215 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,671 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,050 |
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12,845 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,068 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
430,399 |
|
|
|
8,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(439,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
588,852 |
|
|
$ |
714,851 |
|
|
$ |
13,395 |
|
|
$ |
(523,811 |
) |
|
$ |
793,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
$ |
49,502 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,744 |
|
Intercompany payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,036 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
(84,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
35,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,457 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
32,731 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,990 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,215 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
237,607 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
(84,784 |
) |
|
|
166,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6,946 |
) |
|
|
32,780 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,301 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,331 |
|
Deferred compensation liabilities |
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,514 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
421,361 |
|
|
|
430,399 |
|
|
|
8,628 |
|
|
|
(439,027 |
) |
|
|
421,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
588,852 |
|
|
$ |
714,851 |
|
|
$ |
13,395 |
|
|
$ |
(523,811 |
) |
|
$ |
793,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,075,042 |
|
|
$ |
25,016 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
754,739 |
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,066 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
18,846 |
|
|
|
159,074 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,060 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
19,003 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,118 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
Other operating expenses net |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
19,428 |
|
|
|
938,779 |
|
|
|
19,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations |
|
|
(19,428 |
) |
|
|
136,263 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,755 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,610 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,244 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(13,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,798 |
) |
Other income net |
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
(10,809 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(28,806 |
) |
|
|
125,009 |
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,838 |
|
Income tax (provision)/benefit |
|
|
10,086 |
|
|
|
(46,782 |
) |
|
|
(2,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,063 |
) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
82,696 |
|
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
63,976 |
|
|
|
81,680 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
(86,149 |
) |
|
|
62,775 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
$ |
82,881 |
|
|
$ |
3,268 |
|
|
$ |
(86,149 |
) |
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
996,714 |
|
|
$ |
21,873 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
719,074 |
|
|
|
11,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730,123 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
11,239 |
|
|
|
144,276 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,183 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
15,710 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,775 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
Other operating expenses net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
12,985 |
|
|
|
883,317 |
|
|
|
17,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations |
|
|
(12,985 |
) |
|
|
113,397 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,979 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,909 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,468 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
Investment impairment charge |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Other income net |
|
|
21,742 |
|
|
|
(17,107 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(10,027 |
) |
|
|
95,749 |
|
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,284 |
|
Income tax (provision)/benefit |
|
|
3,818 |
|
|
|
(34,491 |
) |
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,562 |
) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
59,059 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
52,850 |
|
|
|
63,931 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
(61,732 |
) |
|
|
57,722 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
(2,199 |
) |
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
$ |
59,059 |
|
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
|
$ |
(61,732 |
) |
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales and service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
896,085 |
|
|
$ |
19,885 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
915,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,670 |
|
|
|
9,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,476 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,132 |
|
|
|
138,828 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,262 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
15,189 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,150 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
Other (income)/expenses net |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
17,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
13,501 |
|
|
|
810,064 |
|
|
|
15,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations |
|
|
(13,501 |
) |
|
|
86,021 |
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,769 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(20,548 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,264 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
Other income net |
|
|
22,362 |
|
|
|
(19,224 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(15,658 |
) |
|
|
66,102 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,656 |
|
Income tax (provision)/benefit |
|
|
6,935 |
|
|
|
(23,259 |
) |
|
|
(2,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,428 |
) |
Equity in net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
42,936 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
34,213 |
|
|
|
44,951 |
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
(45,044 |
) |
|
|
36,228 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
$ |
42,936 |
|
|
$ |
2,108 |
|
|
$ |
(45,044 |
) |
|
$ |
35,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
97,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,483 |
|
|
$ |
99,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(25,674 |
) |
|
|
(773 |
) |
|
|
(26,640 |
) |
Business combinations, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
Net proceeds/(payments) from sale of discontinued
operations |
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
(7,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,402 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
Other uses net |
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities |
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
(35,292 |
) |
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
(31,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash overdrafts payable |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
Change in intercompany accounts |
|
|
66,095 |
|
|
|
(62,296 |
) |
|
|
(3,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends (paid)/received to/from shareholders |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(131,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,704 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
Realized excess tax benefit on share based compensation |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,091 |
|
Purchase of note hedges |
|
|
(55,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,100 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of warrants |
|
|
27,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,614 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(6,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,949 |
) |
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(225,500 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,709 |
) |
Other sources and uses net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
(25,827 |
) |
|
|
(61,986 |
) |
|
|
(4,339 |
) |
|
|
(92,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(21,381 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(2,635 |
) |
|
|
(24,286 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
25,258 |
|
|
|
(1,314 |
) |
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
$ |
(1,584 |
) |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
$ |
88,434 |
|
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
|
$ |
98,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(21,073 |
) |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(21,987 |
) |
Business combinations, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,145 |
) |
Net payments from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
Investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
Other sources and uses net |
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
(25,191 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(27,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash overdrafts payable |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
Change in intercompany accounts |
|
|
67,502 |
|
|
|
(66,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(6,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,322 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(19,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,885 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(84,363 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,563 |
) |
Financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(34,141 |
) |
|
|
(63,138 |
) |
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
|
|
(98,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(29,613 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
(27,859 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
54,871 |
|
|
|
(1,419 |
) |
|
|
3,681 |
|
|
|
57,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
25,258 |
|
|
$ |
(1,314 |
) |
|
$ |
5,330 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
16,337 |
|
|
$ |
59,702 |
|
|
$ |
3,974 |
|
|
$ |
80,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
(24,588 |
) |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(25,734 |
) |
Business combinations, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,165 |
) |
Net payments from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(9,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,367 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
Other uses net |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(10,188 |
) |
|
|
(30,854 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(41,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash overdrafts payable |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
Change in intercompany accounts |
|
|
45,051 |
|
|
|
(42,322 |
) |
|
|
(2,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(6,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,172 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(7,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,401 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
12,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(141,125 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,592 |
) |
Other sources net |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(13,078 |
) |
|
|
(36,779 |
) |
|
|
(2,729 |
) |
|
|
(52,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
(7,931 |
) |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
(14,315 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
61,800 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
71,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
54,871 |
|
|
$ |
(1,419 |
) |
|
$ |
3,681 |
|
|
$ |
57,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service revenues and sales |
|
$ |
270,439 |
|
|
$ |
271,387 |
|
|
$ |
272,503 |
|
|
$ |
285,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
82,192 |
|
|
$ |
82,671 |
|
|
$ |
79,621 |
|
|
$ |
88,508 |
|
|
$ |
332,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
29,230 |
|
|
$ |
30,325 |
|
|
$ |
30,583 |
|
|
$ |
32,617 |
|
|
$ |
122,755 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,742 |
) |
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
(2,515 |
) |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(11,244 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of
debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,715 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,798 |
) |
Other incomenet |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
26,357 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
27,996 |
|
|
|
32,087 |
|
|
|
101,838 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(10,136 |
) |
|
|
(5,965 |
) |
|
|
(11,080 |
) |
|
|
(11,882 |
) |
|
|
(39,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(a) |
|
|
16,221 |
|
|
|
9,433 |
|
|
|
16,916 |
|
|
|
20,205 |
|
|
|
62,775 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (a) |
|
$ |
16,221 |
|
|
$ |
9,433 |
|
|
$ |
18,117 |
|
|
$ |
20,205 |
|
|
$ |
63,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
25,716 |
|
|
|
24,506 |
|
|
|
23,933 |
|
|
|
23,959 |
|
|
|
24,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share |
|
|
26,162 |
|
|
|
25,080 |
|
|
|
24,466 |
|
|
|
24,460 |
|
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations
during the respective quarter (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
Pretax (cost)/benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive plan payout |
|
$ |
(5,447 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,620 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,067 |
) |
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
of Inspector General investigation |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,715 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,798 |
) |
Costs related to litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
Other |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,306 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,723 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,557 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aftertax (cost)/benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive plan payout |
|
$ |
(3,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,427 |
) |
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
(2,962 |
) |
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
of Inspector General investigation: |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,726 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
Costs related to litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
Other |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,806 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,355 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,093 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service revenues and sales
|
|
$ |
243,921 |
|
|
$ |
249,068 |
|
|
$ |
253,695 |
|
|
$ |
271,903 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
67,886 |
|
|
$ |
69,965 |
|
|
$ |
68,296 |
|
|
$ |
82,317 |
|
|
$ |
288,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
24,004 |
|
|
$ |
25,945 |
|
|
$ |
23,359 |
|
|
$ |
31,671 |
|
|
$ |
104,979 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,345 |
) |
|
|
(4,300 |
) |
|
|
(4,081 |
) |
|
|
(3,742 |
) |
|
|
(17,468 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of
debt |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
Loss from impairment of
investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Other incomenet |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
19,724 |
|
|
|
22,169 |
|
|
|
18,548 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
90,284 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(7,686 |
) |
|
|
(8,619 |
) |
|
|
(5,673 |
) |
|
|
(10,584 |
) |
|
|
(32,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(a) |
|
|
12,038 |
|
|
|
13,550 |
|
|
|
12,875 |
|
|
|
19,259 |
|
|
|
57,722 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(708 |
) |
|
|
(4,914 |
) |
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
(7,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (a) |
|
$ |
12,215 |
|
|
$ |
12,842 |
|
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
$ |
17,633 |
|
|
$ |
50,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
26,044 |
|
|
|
26,201 |
|
|
|
26,190 |
|
|
|
26,030 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
26,723 |
|
|
|
26,846 |
|
|
|
26,633 |
|
|
|
26,411 |
|
|
|
26,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations
during the respective quarter (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
Pretax (cost)/benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
(430 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(430 |
) |
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
of Inspector General investigation |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
Costs related to litigation settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
Loss from impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(562 |
) |
|
$ |
(360 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(379 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aftertax (cost)/benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
of Inspector General investigation: |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(662 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
Costs related to litigation settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
Loss from impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
Tax adjustments and settlements from prior year returns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(355 |
) |
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data, ratios, percentages and personnel)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004(b) |
|
2003 |
Summary of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues and sales |
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
$ |
915,970 |
|
|
$ |
734,877 |
|
|
$ |
260,776 |
|
Gross profit (excluding
depreciation) |
|
|
332,992 |
|
|
|
288,464 |
|
|
|
271,494 |
|
|
|
228,107 |
|
|
|
113,958 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
20,118 |
|
|
|
16,775 |
|
|
|
16,150 |
|
|
|
14,542 |
|
|
|
9,519 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Income from operations (b) |
|
|
122,755 |
|
|
|
104,979 |
|
|
|
76,769 |
|
|
|
57,954 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
Income from continuing operations
(c) |
|
|
62,775 |
|
|
|
57,722 |
|
|
|
36,228 |
|
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
11,188 |
|
Net income/(loss) (c) |
|
|
63,976 |
|
|
|
50,651 |
|
|
|
35,817 |
|
|
|
27,512 |
|
|
|
(3,435 |
) |
Earnings/(loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
Average number of shares
outstanding |
|
|
24,520 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
25,552 |
|
|
|
24,120 |
|
|
|
19,848 |
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
Average number of shares
outstanding |
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
|
26,669 |
|
|
|
26,299 |
|
|
|
24,636 |
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Financial PositionYear-End |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
|
$ |
29,274 |
|
|
$ |
57,133 |
|
|
$ |
71,448 |
|
|
$ |
50,688 |
|
Working capital/(deficit) |
|
|
(13,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,951 |
) |
|
|
35,355 |
|
|
|
28,439 |
|
|
|
32,778 |
|
Current ratio |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
Properties and equipment, at cost less
accumulated depreciation |
|
$ |
74,513 |
|
|
$ |
70,140 |
|
|
$ |
65,155 |
|
|
$ |
55,796 |
|
|
$ |
31,440 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
772,313 |
|
|
|
793,287 |
|
|
|
839,103 |
|
|
|
825,566 |
|
|
|
328,458 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
214,669 |
|
|
|
150,331 |
|
|
|
234,058 |
|
|
|
279,510 |
|
|
|
25,931 |
|
Convertible junior subordinated
debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,126 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
364,349 |
|
|
|
421,361 |
|
|
|
384,175 |
|
|
|
332,092 |
|
|
|
192,693 |
|
Other StatisticsContinuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
26,640 |
|
|
$ |
21,987 |
|
|
$ |
25,734 |
|
|
$ |
18,290 |
|
|
$ |
10,381 |
|
Number of employees |
|
|
11,783 |
|
|
|
11,621 |
|
|
|
10,881 |
|
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Continuing operations exclude VITAS of Arizona, discontinued in 2006; Service America, discontinued in 2004; and Patient Care, discontinued in 2002. |
|
(b) |
|
The financial results of VITAS are included in the consolidated results of the Company beginning on February 24, 2004, the date the Company acquired
the remaining 63% of VITAS it did not own, bringing its ownership in VITAS to 100%. |
|
(c) |
|
The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations during the respective year (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Aftertax benefit/(cost): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
(8,778 |
) |
|
$ |
(273 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,523 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,030 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term incentive plan payout |
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,434 |
) |
|
|
(5,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(2,962 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to litigation settlelments |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(10,757 |
) |
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
General investigation |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax adjustments and settlements from prior-year returns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to casualty insurance related to prior-periods
experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of transaction-related expenses of the VITAS
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings/(loss) of VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,105 |
) |
|
|
922 |
|
Expenses related to debt registration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital gains on sales of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
Severance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,358 |
) |
Other |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(16,456 |
) |
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,314 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,798 |
) |
|
$ |
1,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We operate through our two wholly owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation (VITAS)
and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (Roto-Rooter). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make
terminally ill patients final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of doctors,
nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical
services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their
families. Roto-Rooter is focused on providing plumbing and drain cleaning services to both
residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent
contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of
the U.S. population.
The following is a summary of the key operating results for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005 (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Consolidated service revenues and sales |
|
$ |
1,100,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,587 |
|
|
$ |
915,970 |
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
62,775 |
|
|
$ |
57,722 |
|
|
$ |
36,228 |
|
|
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
2007 versus 2006
The increase in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2006 to 2007 was driven by an 8%
increase at both VITAS and Roto-Rooter. The increase at VITAS was the result of an increase in
average daily census (ADC) of 6% and the annual Medicare price increase of 3% offset by changes
in the mix of care. The increase at Roto-Rooter was mainly driven by price increases and job mix
changes. Job count was essentially flat between years. Consolidated income from continuing
operations and diluted EPS from continuing operations increased as a result of higher service
revenues and sales, which allowed us to further leverage our current cost structure. The 2007
results were negatively impacted by pretax losses of $13.8 million ($8.8 million aftertax) related
to our refinancing transactions discussed below.
2006 versus 2005
The increase in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2005 to 2006 was driven by a 13%
increase at VITAS and a 7% increase at Roto-Rooter. The increase at VITAS was the result of an
increase in ADC of 10% and the annual Medicare price increase of 3.5% offset by changes in the mix
of care. The increase at Roto-Rooter was mainly driven by a 1% increase in jobs, a 4.5% price
increase and a shift in job mix. Consolidated income from continuing operations and diluted EPS
from continuing operations increased in 2006 as a result of the higher service revenues and sales,
which allowed us to further leverage our current cost structure. The 2005 results were negatively
impacted by a $17.4 million pretax charge ($10.8 million aftertax) at VITAS for the settlement of a
class action lawsuit.
Other Developments
In the second quarter of 2007, we completed the following financing and capital transactions:
|
|
|
Entered into a new senior secured credit facility due in 2012 which includes a $100
million term loan, a $175 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million
expansion feature; |
|
|
|
|
Using the proceeds from the senior secured credit facility, we retired our $150
million, 8.75% Senior Notes at a price of 104.375% plus accrued but unpaid interest; |
|
|
|
|
Issued $200 million of 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes
due in 2014; |
|
|
|
|
Using the proceeds from the Senior Convertible Notes, we repaid a portion of our
revolving line of credit and we repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares of our
outstanding capital stock. |
The effect of these transactions was to reduce our overall borrowing rate and to reduce the
number of shares of capital stock outstanding. In connection with these transactions, we incurred
a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13.8 million related to the premium paid to
retire our 8.75% Senior Notes and the write-off of deferred debt costs from the Senior Notes and
replaced credit facility.
38
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Significant factors affecting our cash flows during 2007 and financial position at December
31, 2007, include the following:
|
|
|
Our continuing operations generated cash of $99.6 million; |
|
|
|
|
We borrowed $300.0 million and repaid approximately $225.7 million in long-term
debt; |
|
|
|
|
We repurchased our stock using cash of $131.7 million; |
|
|
|
|
We purchased hedges and sold warrants related to our convertible debt offering using
net cash of $27.5 million; and |
|
|
|
|
We spent $26.6 million on capital expenditures. |
The ratio of total debt to total capital was 38.2% at December 31, 2007, compared with 26.3%
at December 31, 2006. Our current ratio was 0.91 and 0.98 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The change in these ratios from 2006 to 2007 relates mainly to our refinancing and
repayment of long-term debt as well as our stock repurchase plan activity in 2007.
Collectively, the 2007 Facility and the Notes require us to meet certain restrictive financial
covenants, in addition to non-financial covenants, including maximum leverage ratios, minimum fixed
charge coverage and consolidated net worth ratios, limits on operating leases and minimum asset
value limits. We are in compliance with all financial and non-financial debt covenants as of
December 31, 2007. We have issued $30.1 million in standby letters of credit as of December 31,
2007, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under
the revolving credit agreement. As of December 31, 2007, we have approximately $144.9 million of
unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility,
excluding the expansion feature. We believe our cash flow from operating activities and our unused
eligible lines of credit are sufficient to fund our business in the near term.
CASH FLOW
Our cash flows for 2007, 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
|
$ |
98.6 |
|
|
$ |
80.0 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash excess after capital expenditures |
|
|
73.0 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of costs |
|
|
293.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
83.2 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(225.7 |
) |
|
|
(84.6 |
) |
|
|
(141.6 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(131.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Purchase of note hedge |
|
|
(55.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Net proceeds/(uses) from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Issuance of capital stock, net of costs |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Business combinations |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Othernet |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(24.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In connection with the sale of DuBois Chemicals, Inc. (DuBois) in 1991, we provided
allowances and accruals relating to several long-term costs, including income tax matters, lease
commitments and environmental costs. Also, in conjunction with the sales of The Omnia Group
(Omnia) and National Sanitary Supply Company in 1997, the sale of Cadre Computer Resources, Inc.
(Cadre Computer) in 2001 and the sale of Service America Network Inc. (Service America) in
2005, we provided long-term allowances and accruals relating to costs of severance arrangements,
lease commitments and income tax matters. Additionally, we retained liability for Service
Americas casualty insurance claims that were incurred prior to the disposal date. In connection
with the sale of VITAS Phoenix operation in November 2006, we have accrued an estimate of our
total exposure for the Medicare Cap through the date of sale. In the aggregate, we believe these
allowances and accruals are adequate as of December 31, 2007. Based on reviews of our
environmental-related liabilities under the DuBois sale agreement, we have estimated our remaining
liability to be $1.7 million. As of December 31, 2007, we are
39
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
contingently liable for additional cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million,
for which no provision has been recorded in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
On September 28, 2006, we announced a preliminary settlement in regard to litigation related
to the 2002 divestiture of our Patient Care business segment. Prior to the settlement, we had a
long-term receivable from Patient Care of $12.5 million. We also had current accounts receivable
from Patient Care for the post-closing balance sheet valuation and for expenses paid by us after
closing on Patient Cares behalf of $3.4 million. We were in litigation with Patient Care over the
collection of these current amounts and their allegations that our acquisition of VITAS violated a
non-compete covenant in the sales agreement. We agreed to forgive $1.2 million of the current
receivable related to the post-closing balance sheet valuation and convert the remaining amount
into debt secured by a promissory note with the same terms as the $12.5 million long-term
receivable. We incurred additional costs related to the settlement of $1.1 million for additional
insurance and legal costs related to workers compensation claims incurred prior to the sale. The
aftertax charge related to these amounts of $1.5 million has been recorded as discontinued
operations in 2006.
In December 2007, the parties amended the terms of the long-term notes receivable from Patient
Care. We agreed to waive the prepayment penalty provisions in the notes provided that Patient Care
paid $5 million of principal on or before December 31, 2007, and the remaining outstanding
principal on or before March 31, 2008. On December 31, 2007, we received a principal payment of $5
million from Patient Care. Subsequent to year-end, we received principal payments of $5.7 million
from Patient Care. We anticipate receiving the remaining principal amount outstanding on or before
March 31, 2008.
We also have a warrant to purchase 2% of Patient Cares common stock that we recorded as a
$1.4 million investment. As a result of financial information received in 2006, we determined that
the value of the warrants was permanently impaired and recorded a pretax impairment charge of $1.4
million. This charge is included in income from continuing operations on the consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Like other large California employers, our VITAS subsidiary faces allegations of purported
class-wide wage and hour violations. It was party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior
Court of California, Los Angeles County, in April of 2004 by Ann Marie Costa, Ana Jimenez, Mariea
Ruteaya and Gracetta Wilson (Costa). This case alleged failure to pay overtime wages for hours
worked off the clock on administrative tasks, including voicemail retrieval, time entry, travel
to and from work, and pager response. This case also alleged VITAS failed to provide meal and
break periods to a purported class of California nurses, home health aides and licensed clinical
social workers. The case also sought payment of penalties, interest, and Plaintiffs attorney
fees. VITAS contested these allegations. During 2006, we reached a tentative settlement and on
June 26, 2006, the court granted final approval of the settlement ($19.9 million).
VITAS is party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California, Los
Angeles County, in September 2006 by Bernadette Santos, Keith Knoche and Joyce White (Santos).
This case, filed by the Costa case Plaintiffs counsel, makes similar allegations of failure to pay
overtime and failure to provide meal and rest periods to a purported class of California admissions
nurses, chaplains and sales representatives. The case likewise seeks payment of penalties,
interest and Plaintiffs attorney fees. VITAS contests these allegations. The lawsuit is in its
early stage and we are unable to estimate our potential liability, if any, with respect to these
allegations.
In April 2007, our Roto-Rooter subsidiary was named in a class action lawsuit filed in San
Mateo Superior Court by Stanley Ita (Ita) alleging class-wide wage and hour violations at one
California branch. This suit alleges failure to provide meal and break periods, credit for work
time beginning from the first call to dispatch rather than arrival at first assignment and improper
calculations of work time and overtime. The case sought payment of penalties, interest and
Plaintiffs attorney fees. After the suit was filed, we offered a settlement to the members of the
class and paid approximately $200,000. In January 2008, we agreed to a tentative settlement with
the remaining members of the class for approximately $1.8 million. The tentative settlement is
subject to court approval. The tentative settlement has been accrued in the accompanying financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In April 2005, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the Department of Health and Human
Services served VITAS with civil subpoenas relating to VITAS alleged failure to appropriately bill
Medicare and Medicaid for hospice services. As part of this investigation, the OIG selected
medical records for 320 past and current patients from VITAS three largest programs for review.
It also sought policies and procedures dating back to 1998 covering admissions, certifications,
recertifications and discharges. During the third quarter of 2005 and again in May 2006, the OIG
requested additional information from us. The Court dismissed a related qui tam complaint filed in
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida with prejudice in July 2007. The
plaintiffs are appealing this dismissal. The government continues to investigate the complaints
allegations. Pretax expenses related to complying with OIG requests have been immaterial in 2007.
We
40
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
incurred pretax expense related to complying with OIG requests and defending the litigation of $1.1
million and $637,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Regardless of outcome, defense of litigation and complying with government investigations
adversely affects us through defense costs, diversion of our time and related publicity. In the
normal course of business, we are a party to various claims and legal proceedings. We record a
reserve for these matters when an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the potential
liability is reasonably estimable.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The table below summarizes our debt and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4 -5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
224,831 |
|
|
$ |
10,162 |
|
|
$ |
14,669 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Interest obligation on long-term debt (a) |
|
|
23,906 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
5,156 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
54,635 |
|
|
|
15,010 |
|
|
|
22,089 |
|
|
|
11,111 |
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
Severance obligations |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions. |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of discontinued operations |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (b) |
|
|
48,111 |
|
|
|
48,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current obligations (c ) |
|
|
40,072 |
|
|
|
40,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations (d) |
|
|
32,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
29,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
428,082 |
|
|
$ |
118,973 |
|
|
$ |
47,815 |
|
|
$ |
20,564 |
|
|
$ |
240,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our interest obligation on long-term debt includes interest on fixed rate debt only. |
|
(b) |
|
Purchase obligations primarily consist of accounts payable at December 31, 2007. |
|
(c) |
|
Other current obligations consist of accrued salaries and wages at December 31, 2007. |
|
(d) |
|
Other long-term obligations comprise largely pension and excess benefit obligations. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2007 Versus 2006 Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of operations
relating to continuing operations for 2007 versus 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Service revenues and sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
56,334 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
25,137 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
81,471 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
|
|
36,943 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
22,877 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(13,368 |
) |
|
|
3,109 |
|
Loss from impairment of investment |
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Other income net |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(6,501 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5,053 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Our service revenues and sales for the year ended December 31, 2007, increased $81.5 million,
or 8%, versus revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006. The VITAS segment accounted for $56.4
million of this increase and Roto-Rooter accounted for the remaining $25.1 million of the increase.
The increase in VITAS revenues for 2007 versus 2006 is attributable to the following (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Routine homecare |
|
$ |
54,860 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Continuous care |
|
|
(5,295 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
General inpatient |
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Medicare Cap |
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
56,334 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revenue increase for VITAS includes the annual increase in the Medicare reimbursement rate
of approximately 3% to 4%. In addition, the ADC for routine homecare and general inpatient
increased 7.3% and 1.5%, respectively, from 2006. ADC for continuous care decreased 7.6% from
2006. ADC is a key measure we use to monitor volume growth in our hospice programs. Changes in
total program admissions and average length of stay for our patients are the main drivers of
changes in ADC. Additionally, we had a $3.7 million favorable comparison from 2006 related to
reductions in revenue for the Medicare Cap. We recorded a reduction in revenue for Medicare Cap in
2007 of $242,000 compared to $3.9 million in 2006. The improvement is a result of improved
admissions and consolidation of certain provider numbers within key programs. The 2007 revenue
reduction is related to retroactive billings from prior periods for patients who transferred
between hospice providers. No Medicare Cap liability for the 2007 or 2008 measurement periods have
been recorded as of December 31, 2007.
The increase in Roto-Rooters service revenues and sales for 2007 versus 2006 is attributable
to the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Plumbing |
|
$ |
13,973 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Sewer and drain cleaning |
|
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
25,137 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plumbing revenues for 2007 increased from 2006 due to a 4% increase in the average price per
job and a 7% increase in the number of jobs performed. Sewer and drain cleaning revenues for 2007
increased from 2006 due to a 7% increase in the average price per job offset by a 3% decrease in
the number of jobs performed. The increase in other revenues is attributable primarily to
increases in independent contractor operations.
The consolidated gross margin was 30.3% in 2007 versus 28.3% in 2006. On a segment basis,
VITAS gross margin was 22.4% in 2007 and 20.3% in 2006. The Medicare Cap accounts for
approximately 0.5% of the increase in VITAS gross margin. Approximately 0.5% of the improvement
in gross margin relates to certain expenses that were historically cost of services but were
centralized in 2007 and are now included in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses.
The remaining improvement relates to better utilization of our labor in 2007. In 2006, we
experienced lower gross margins due to excess patient care capacity. Roto-Rooters gross margin
was 47.6% in 2007 and 45.9% in 2006. The improvement in Roto-Rooters gross margin is the result
of price increases noted above coupled with continued improvement in retention of service
technicians, which enhances overall productivity of the workforce and reduces our workers
compensation costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for 2007 increased $22.9 million (14%).
The increase is attributable to an increase in LTIP costs of $7.1 million, stock option expense of
$3.5 million and advertising costs of $2.7 million. Additionally, $3.8 million of the increase
relates to the centralization of certain activities at our VITAS subsidiary which were previously
at the program level and classified as cost of services prior to 2007. The remaining increase in
SG&A is the result of typical cost of living increases for salaries and benefits plus increases in
certain selling expenses which vary based on changes in revenue.
42
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Depreciation expense increased $3.3 million (20%) in 2007 compared to 2006 due to increased
depreciation on computer hardware and leasehold improvements mainly at our VITAS subsidiary. Other
expenses increased $517,000 due to the impact of the settlement of a class action lawsuit at
Roto-Rooter offset by the gain on sale of Roto-Rooters Florida call center facility.
Interest expense decreased $6.2 million (36%) from 2006 to 2007 mainly due to the refinancing
in May 2007 and the subsequent repayment of long-term debt throughout the remainder of 2007. In
conjunction with our May 2007 refinancing transactions, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of
debt of $13.8 million. In the third quarter of 2006, we recorded a $1.4 million impairment charge
related to our investment in the warrants of Patient Care as discussed in the commitments and
contingencies section above.
Our effective income tax rate was 38.4% in 2007 versus 36.1% in 2006. The increase in our
effective tax rate relates to the $2.1 million tax adjustment required upon expiration of certain
statutes in 2006. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, no such tax
adjustments were necessary in 2007.
Income from continuing operations increased $5.1 million (9%) from 2006 to 2007. Income from
continuing operations for both periods include the following aftertax adjustments that
increased/(reduced) after tax earnings (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs associated with the OIG investigation |
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
Costs of class action litigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to class action litigation |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax adjustments required upon expiration of statutes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(2,962 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
Tax adjustments required upon expiration of statutes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
864 |
|
Impairment of Patient Care warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
Other |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(16,456 |
) |
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations for 2007, 2006 and 2005 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
VITAS Phoenix |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
$ |
(4,872 |
) |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
Service America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
Adjustment to accruals of operations discontinued in prior years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,167 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
$ |
(7,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, our Board of Directors approved and we announced our intention to exit the
hospice market in Phoenix, Arizona. As a result of our announcement, we performed interim
impairment tests of our long-lived assets of the Phoenix operation as of September 30, 2006, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge of $2.4 million was recorded for the
referral network intangible asset and fixed assets during the third quarter of 2006. The sale was
completed in November 2006. The acquiring corporation purchased the substantial majority of assets
of the Phoenix program for $2.5 million. In October 2007, we received notification from the
Federal governments fiscal intermediary regarding our Medicare Cap liabilities related to the 2006
measurement period. The notification revealed that we were over accrued at our discontinued
Phoenix operation by $1.9 million. We have recorded the reversal of this over accrual and its
related tax effects in
43
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, we
have $500,000 accrued for potential retroactive billings related to the Medicare Cap for Phoenix.
2007 Versus 2006 Segment Results
The change in net income for 2007 versus 2006 is due to (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
11,415 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
6,397 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(12,759 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
8,272 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,325 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Versus 2005 Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of operations
relating to continuing operations for 2006 versus 2005 (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Service revenues and sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
80,459 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
22,158 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
102,617 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Cost of services provided and goods sold |
|
|
85,647 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
(16,119 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
28,210 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Loss on impairment of investment |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
Other income net |
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
35,628 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(14,134 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
21,494 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our service revenues and sales for the year ended December 31, 2006, increased $102.6 million,
or 11%, versus revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005. The VITAS segment accounted for
$80.4 million of this increase and Roto-Rooter accounted for the remaining $22.2 million of the
increase.
The increase in VITAS revenues for 2006 versus 2005 is attributable to the following (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Routine homecare |
|
$ |
65,632 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Continuous care |
|
|
14,679 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
General inpatient |
|
|
4,046 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Medicare cap |
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
80,459 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revenue increase for VITAS includes the annual increase in the Medicare reimbursement rate
of approximately 3% to 4%. In addition, the Average Daily Census (ADC) for routine homecare,
continuous care and general inpatient
44
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
increased 10.7%, 8.2% and 1.0%, respectively, from 2005. ADC is a key measure we use to
monitor volume growth in our hospice programs. Changes in total program admissions and average
length of stay for our patients are the main drivers of changes in ADC. The increases discussed
above were offset by a reduction in revenue of $3.9 million related to the Medicare Cap. The
components of the pretax charges are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
2007 measurement period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
2006 measurement period |
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
2,903 |
|
|
|
10,163 |
|
2005 measurement period |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,931 |
|
|
$ |
3,898 |
|
|
$ |
11,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts related to the Phoenix program are included in discontinued operations. Charges
for the 2005 measurement period relate to prior-year billing limitations resulting from the fiscal
intermediary reallocating admissions for deceased Medicare patients who received hospice care from
multiple providers. The amounts for the 2006 and 2007 measurement periods are estimates made by
management based upon Medicare admissions and Medicare revenue in each program.
The increase in Roto-Rooters service revenues and sales for 2006 versus 2005 is attributable
to the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Plumbing |
|
$ |
10,265 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Sewer and drain cleaning |
|
|
10,420 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
22,158 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plumbing revenues for 2006 increased from 2005 due to a 7% increase in the average price per
job and a 1% increase in the number of jobs performed. The increase in the average price per job
reflects a combination of price increases coupled with our focus on larger commercial jobs. Our
average price for a commercial plumbing job is approximately 36% higher than the average price for
a residential plumbing job. Sewer and drain cleaning revenues for 2006 increased from 2005 due to
a 7% increase in the average price per job and a 1% increase in the number of jobs performed. The
increase in the average price per job reflects a combination of price increases coupled with our
focus on larger commercial jobs. Our average price for a commercial sewer and drain-cleaning job
is approximately 37% higher than the average price for a residential sewer and drain-cleaning job.
The increase in other revenues is attributable primarily to increases in independent contractor
operations.
The consolidated gross margin was 28.3% in 2006 versus 29.6% in 2005. On a segment basis,
VITAS gross margin was 20.3% in 2006 and 21.7% in 2005. The Medicare Cap accounts for
approximately 0.6% of the decrease in VITAS gross margin. The remaining difference is
attributable to increased labor costs. Given the historic difficulty in hiring and retaining
qualified healthcare professionals, management continued to build manpower in expectation of future
increases in admissions and ADC. Additionally, some of our fastest growing hospice programs are
located in areas with a high cost of living, which increases our overall average labor cost per
patient day served. Roto-Rooters gross margin was 45.9% in 2006 and 46.2% in 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for 2006 increased $3.9 million (2.5%)
as summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in selling expenses |
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
Increase in general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,914 |
|
Total increase |
|
$ |
3,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in selling expenses is mainly attributable to an increase in advertising costs at
Roto-Rooter. The increase in general and administrative expenses is caused mainly by salary
increases and the impact of expensing stock options beginning in 2006 ($1.2 million) offset by a
decrease in LTIP expenses of $5.5 million.
45
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Other expenses decreased $16.1 million mainly due to the impact of the settlement of a class
action lawsuit at VITAS in 2005.
Income from operations for 2006 increased $28.2 million (37%) versus 2005 as summarized below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in gross margin |
|
$ |
16,970 |
|
Increase in SG&A expenses, depreciation, and amortization |
|
|
(4,879 |
) |
Cost in 2005 of settling VITAS class action litigation |
|
|
17,350 |
|
All other |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total increase |
|
$ |
28,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $3.8 million (18%) from 2005 to 2006 mainly due to the repayment of
approximately $85 million in long-term debt in March 2006. In the third quarter of 2006, we
recorded a $1.4 million impairment charge related to our investment in the warrants of Patient Care
as further discussed in the commitments and contingencies section above.
Our effective income tax rate was 36.1% in 2006 versus 33.7% in 2005. The increase in our
effective tax rate relates to the tax adjustments required upon expiration of certain statutes, of
$2.1 million in 2006 and $2.0 million in 2005. While the dollar amounts are consistent between
years, the 2005 amount is a larger percentage of pretax income and thus has a larger impact on
reducing the overall rate for 2005.
Income from continuing operations increased $21.5 million (59%) from 2005 to 2006. Income
from continuing operations for both periods include the following after tax adjustments that
increased/(reduced) after tax earnings (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
VITAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs associated with the OIG investigation |
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
|
$ |
(397 |
) |
Costs of class action litigation |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(10,757 |
) |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax adjustments required upon expiration
of statutes |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
Favorable adjustment to casualty insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
Long-term incentive compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,434 |
) |
VITAS transaction expense adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
Impairment of Patient Care warrants |
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax adjustments required upon expiration
of statutes |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
Other |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(380 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations for 2006, 2005 and 2004 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
VITAS Phoenix |
|
$ |
(4,872 |
) |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Service America |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
|
|
8,559 |
|
Adjustment to accruals of operations discontinued in prior years |
|
|
(2,167 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(7,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(411 |
) |
|
$ |
8,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The disposal of Service America was completed in May 2005. The loss on disposal of Service
America in 2005 arises from the finalization of asset and liability values and related tax benefits
resulting from the consummation of the sale transaction. For 2004, the gain for Service America
includes an estimated tax benefit on the disposal of approximately $14.2 million, primarily due to
the recognition of non-deductible goodwill impairment losses in prior years.
46
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
The adjustments to accruals related to operations discontinued in prior years primarily
include the Patient Care settlement in 2006, favorable adjustments to accruals for note receivable
losses on the sale of Cadre Computer (discontinued in 2001) and unfavorable adjustments to accruals
related to the sale of DuBois in 1991. Adjustments to the DuBois accruals relate to environmental
liabilities we retained upon the sale of DuBois in 1991. We believe amounts accrued are reasonable
under the circumstances, but due to the nature of the liabilities, we could be required to increase
the accrual in future years to cover additional charges.
2006 Versus 2005 Segment Results
The change in net income for 2006 versus 2005 is due to (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
VITAS |
|
$ |
14,913 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Roto-Rooter |
|
|
4,828 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(6,660 |
) |
|
|
(1,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase |
|
$ |
14,834 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition
For both the Roto-Rooter and VITAS segments, service revenues and sales are recognized when
the earnings process has been completed. Generally, this occurs when services are provided or
products are delivered. Sales of Roto-Rooter products, including drain cleaning machines and drain
cleaning solution, comprise less than 2% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.
VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from third-party payers,
which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid. Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in
part on the basis that such services are not eligible for coverage and do not qualify for
reimbursement. We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial
statements. The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and
generally does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis.
VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services. Specifically, if
the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds
20% of the total days of hospice care such program provides to all patients for an annual period
beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine
homecare rate. We have never had a program reach the inpatient cap. None of our hospice programs
are expected to be within 15% of the inpatient cap for the 2007 measurement period while the
majority of our programs have expected cushion in excess of 75% of the inpatient cap. Due to the
significant cushion at each program, we do not anticipate it to be reasonably likely that any
program will be subject to the inpatient cap in the foreseeable future.
VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary Cap. Compliance with the Medicare
Cap is measured by comparing the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number
with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or
programs covered by that Medicare provider number between November 1 of each year and October 31 of
the following year with the product of the per-beneficiary Cap amount and the number of Medicare
beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs during
the relevant period.
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific
admissions, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether they
are likely to exceed the Medicare Cap. Should we determine that a provider number is likely to
exceed the Medicare Cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective action to
influence the patient mix or to increase patient admissions. However, should we project our
corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare Cap, we estimate the
amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal
government under the Medicare Cap and record that amount as a reduction in service revenue.
Our estimate of the Medicare Cap liability is particularly sensitive to allocations made by
our fiscal intermediary relative to patient transfers between hospices. We are allocated a
percentage of the Medicare Cap based on the total days a patient spent in hospice care. The
allocation for patient transfers cannot be determined until a patient dies. As the number of
47
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
days a patient spends in hospice is based on a future event, this allocation process may take
several years. Therefore, we use only first time Medicare admissions in our estimate of the
Medicare Cap billing limitation. This method assumes that credit received for patients who
transfer into our program will be offset by credit lost from patients who transfer out of our
program. If the actual relationship of transfers in and transfers out for a given measurement
period proves to be different for any program at or near a billing limitation, our estimate of the
liability would increase or decrease on a dollar-for-dollar basis. While our method has
historically been materially accurate, each program can vary during a given measurement period.
Based on the methodology discussed above, we have not recorded a Medicare Cap liability for
the 2007 or 2008 measurement period during the year ended December 31, 2007. Due to the
variability caused by patient transfers, we have calculated the potential range of loss for all
continuing programs to be between zero and $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Insurance Accruals
For the Roto-Rooter segment and Chemeds Corporate Office, we self-insure for all casualty
insurance claims (workers compensation, auto liability and general liability). As a result, we
closely monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the
appropriate level of accrual for self-insured claims. Our third-party administrator (TPA)
processes and reviews claims on a monthly basis. Currently, our exposure on any single claim is
capped at $500,000. For most of the prior years, the caps for general liability and workers
compensation were between $250,000 and $500,000 per claim. In developing our estimates, we
accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10 years to calculate loss development factors
(LDF) by insurance coverage type. LDFs are applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate
potential liability for known and unknown claims for each open policy year. LDFs are updated
annually. Because this methodology relies heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is
whether the historical claims are an accurate predictor of future claims exposure. The risk also
exists that certain claims have been incurred and not reported on a timely basis. To mitigate
these risks, in conjunction with our TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation
of data and compare claims trends with the industry experience of our TPA.
For the VITAS segment, we self-insure for workers compensation claims. Currently, VITAS
exposure on any single claim is capped at $500,000. For VITAS self-insurance accruals for
workers compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our
other business units.
Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for
amounts exceeding our stop loss limits. Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are recorded
as accounts receivable. Claims experience related adjustments to our casualty and workers
compensation accrual for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were net, pretax credits
of $2.9 million, $2.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
As an indication of the sensitivity of the accrued liability to reported claims, our analysis
indicates that a 1% across-the-board increase or decrease in the amount of projected losses for all
of our continuing operations would increase or decrease the accrued insurance liability at December
31, 2007, by $1.4 million or 3.9%. While the amount recorded represents our best estimate of the
casualty and workers compensation insurance liability, we have calculated, based on historical
claims experience, the actual loss could reasonably be expected to increase or decrease by
approximately $2.3 million as of December 31, 2007.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are
recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax
liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the
differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred
tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on the date of enactment.
We are subject to income taxes in the Federal and most state jurisdictions. We are
periodically audited by various taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required to determine
our provision for income taxes. On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN
48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109, which
prescribes a comprehensive model for how to recognize, measure, present and disclose in financial
statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Upon adoption of
FIN 48, the financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain
positions assuming the taxing authorities full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
48
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations and
are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. The selection of an amortization method is based on which method best
reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset. The VITAS trade name is considered to have an
indefinite life. Goodwill and the VITAS trade name are tested at least annually for impairment.
The valuation of goodwill and the VITAS trade name is dependent upon many factors, some of which
are market-driven and beyond our control. The valuation of goodwill and the VITAS trade name
indicate that the fair value exceeds the carrying value at October 1, 2007.
Stock-based Compensation Plans
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, revised (SFAS 123(R)) which establishes accounting for stock-based
compensation for employees. Under SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the
grant date, based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the employees
requisite service period on a straight-line basis. We previously applied Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25 and provided the pro-forma disclosures required by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123. We elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as
provided by SFAS 123(R). Accordingly, we have not restated previously reported financial statement
amounts. Other than certain reclassifications, there was no material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model,
consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and our prior-period pro-forma disclosure of net income including
stock-based compensation expense. We determine expected term, volatility, dividend yield and
forfeiture rate based on our historical experience. We believe that historical experience is the
best indicator of these factors.
RECENT ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R) Business Combinations (revised 2007)
(SFAS 141(R)), which changes certain aspects of the accounting for business combinations. This
Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement No. 141 that the purchase method of
accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each
business combination. SFAS 141(R) modifies existing accounting guidance in the areas of deal and
restructuring costs, acquired contingencies, contingent consideration, in-process research and
development, accounting for subsequent tax adjustments and assessing the valuation date. This
Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
An entity may not apply it before that date. There will be no impact on our financial statements
as a result of the adoption of SFAS 141(R), however our accounting for all business combinations
after adoption will comply with the new standard.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which requires ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by others to be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated
balance sheet within equity but separate from the parent companys equity. SFAS 160 also affects
the accounting requirements when the parent company either purchases a higher ownership interest or
deconsolidates the equity investment. This Statement applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that
date. We currently do not have noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits an entity to measure certain
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value
option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each reporting date. The fair value
option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with a few exceptions, as long as it is
applied to the entire instrument. The fair value election is irrevocable unless a new election
date occurs. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after
November 15, 2007. There will be no impact on our financial condition and results of operations as
a result of the adoption of SFAS 159.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value
measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). It sets a common definition of fair value to be used throughout GAAP. The new standard is
designed to make the measurement of fair value more consistent and comparable and improve
disclosures about those measures. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for
49
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. There will be no impact on our financial
condition and results of operations as a result of the adoption of SFAS 157. We are currently
evaluating the impact SFAS 157 will have on our footnote disclosures.
50
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER, 2007 AND 2006
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OPERATING STATISTICS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue ($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
|
$ |
143,125 |
|
|
$ |
132,082 |
|
|
$ |
546,872 |
|
|
$ |
492,012 |
|
Inpatient |
|
|
23,927 |
|
|
|
23,316 |
|
|
|
92,995 |
|
|
|
89,882 |
|
Continuous care |
|
|
30,150 |
|
|
|
31,509 |
|
|
|
115,801 |
|
|
|
121,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before Medicare Cap
allowance |
|
$ |
197,202 |
|
|
$ |
186,907 |
|
|
$ |
755,668 |
|
|
$ |
702,990 |
|
Medicare Cap allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
197,202 |
|
|
$ |
186,219 |
|
|
$ |
755,426 |
|
|
$ |
699,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue as a percent of total
before Medicare Cap allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
|
|
72.6 |
% |
|
|
70.6 |
% |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
Inpatient |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Continuous care |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before Medicare Cap
allowance |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Medicare Cap allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
99.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily census (ADC) (days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homecare |
|
|
7,121 |
|
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
6,333 |
|
Nursing home |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine homecare |
|
|
10,731 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
10,547 |
|
|
|
9,834 |
|
Inpatient |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Continuous care |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
11,660 |
|
|
|
11,174 |
|
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Admissions |
|
|
13,594 |
|
|
|
13,291 |
|
|
|
54,798 |
|
|
|
52,736 |
|
Total Discharges |
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
13,199 |
|
|
|
54,530 |
|
|
|
51,552 |
|
Average length of stay (days) |
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
Median length of stay (days) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
ADC by major diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neurological |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
Cancer |
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Cardio |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Respiratory |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admissions by major diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neurological |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Cancer |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Cardio |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Respiratory |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct patient care margins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routine homecare |
|
|
51.6 |
% |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
Inpatient |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Continuous care |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Homecare margin drivers
(dollars per patient day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor costs |
|
$ |
49.59 |
|
|
$ |
49.72 |
|
|
$ |
49.14 |
|
|
$ |
49.38 |
|
Drug costs |
|
|
7.73 |
|
|
|
8.17 |
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
|
|
8.12 |
|
Home medical equipment |
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
5.81 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
Medical supplies |
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
Inpatient margin drivers
(dollars per patient day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor costs |
|
$ |
272.46 |
|
|
$ |
261.55 |
|
|
$ |
265.47 |
|
|
$ |
259.25 |
|
Continuous care margin drivers
(dollars per patient day) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor costs |
|
$ |
506.72 |
|
|
$ |
486.46 |
|
|
$ |
486.90 |
|
|
$ |
468.13 |
|
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Accounts receivable days of revenue outstanding |
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
51
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We submitted our Annual Certification of the Chief Executive Officer to the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) regarding the NYSE corporate governance listing standards on May 24, 2007. We
also filed our Certifications of the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 31.3, respectively, to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements and
performance trends that are based upon assumptions subject to certain known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, contingencies and other factors. Such forward-looking statements and trends include,
but are not limited to, the impact of laws and regulations on our operations, our estimate of
future effective income tax rates and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Variances in any
or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could
cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. Our
ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control,
may affect the reliability of our projections and other financial matters.
52
EX-21
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF CHEMED CORPORATION
The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2007: Other
subsidiaries which have been omitted from the list would not, when considered in the aggregate,
constitute a significant subsidiary. Each of the companies is incorporated under the laws of the
state following its name. The percentage given for each company represents the percentage of
voting securities of such company owned by the Company or, where indicated, subsidiaries of the
Company as of December 31, 2007.
All of the majority owned companies listed below are included in the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2007.
Chemed RT, Inc. (Delaware, 100%)
Comfort Care Holdings Co. (Nevada, 100%)
Complete Plumbing Services, Inc. (New York, 49% by Roto-Rooter Services Company; included
within the consolidated financial statements as a consolidated subsidiary)
Consolidated HVAC, Inc. (Ohio, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)
Jet Resource, Inc. (Delaware, 100%)
Nurotoco of Massachusetts, Inc. (Massachusetts, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)
Nurotoco of New Jersey, Inc. (Delaware, 80% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)
Roto RT, Inc. (Delaware, 100% by Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.)
Roto-Rooter Canada, Ltd. (British Columbia, 100% by Roto-Rooter Services Company)
Roto-Rooter
Corporation (Iowa, 100% by Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.)
Roto-Rooter Development Company (Delaware, 100% by Roto-Rooter Corporation)
Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (Delaware, 100%)
Roto-Rooter Services Company (Iowa, 100% by Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.)
RR Plumbing Services Corporation (New York, 49% by Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.; included within
the consolidated financial statements as a consolidated subsidiary)
R.R. UK, Inc. (Delaware, 100% by Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.)
VITAS Care Solutions, Inc. (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Healthcare Corporation)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation (Delaware, 100% by Comfort Care Holdings Co.)
VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C. (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Healthcare Corporation)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Arizona (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services,
L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Illinois (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Central Florida (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services,
L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Florida (Florida, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Ohio (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Atlantic (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare of Texas, L.P. (Texas, 99% by VITAS Holding Corporation, the limited
partner, 1% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C., the general partner)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation Midwest (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Georgia (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS HME Solutions, Inc. (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS of North Florida, Inc. (Florida, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
Hospice Care Incorporated (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
VITAS Holdings Corporation (Delaware, 100% by VITAS Hospice Services, L.L.C.)
EX-23
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-115270) and Form S-8 (Nos. 2- 87202, 2-80712, 33-65244, 33-61063, 333-109104, 333-118714,
333-34525, 333-87071, 333-134107 and 333-87073) of Chemed Corporation of our report dated February
28, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio |
|
|
February
28, 2008 |
|
|
EX-24
EXHIBIT
24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 20, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles H. Erhart, Jr.
|
|
|
Charles H. Erhart, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 20, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joel F. Gemunder
|
|
|
Joel F. Gemunder |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 20, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick P. Grace
|
|
|
Patrick P. Grace |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward L. Hutton
|
|
|
Edward L. Hutton |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas C. Hutton
|
|
|
Thomas C. Hutton |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sandra E. Laney
|
|
|
Sandra E. Laney |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy S. OToole
|
|
|
Timothy S. OToole |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald E. Saunders
|
|
|
Donald E. Saunders |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ George J. Walsh III
|
|
|
George J. Walsh III |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 20, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank E. Wood
|
|
|
Frank E. Wood |
|
|
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned director of CHEMED CORPORATION (Company) hereby appoints EDWARD L. HUTTON,
KEVIN J. MCNAMARA and NAOMI C. DALLOB as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact for the purpose of
signing the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all
amendments thereto, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of such
attorneys-in-fact is appointed with full power to act without the other.
Dated:
February 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Walter L. Krebs
|
|
|
Walter L. Krebs |
|
|
|
|
|
EX-31.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Kevin J. McNamara, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chemed Corporation (registrant); |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth quarter in 2007 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors: |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara
|
|
|
Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
EX-31.2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, David P. Williams, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chemed Corporation (registrant); |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth quarter in 2007 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors: |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David P. Williams
|
|
|
David P. Williams |
|
|
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
EX-31.3
EXHIBIT 31.3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Arthur V. Tucker, Jr., certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chemed Corporation (registrant); |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth quarter in 2007 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors: |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
|
|
|
Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. |
|
|
(Vice President and Controller) |
|
|
EX-32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION BY KEVIN J. MCNAMARA
PURUSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Chemed Corporation (Company), does hereby certify that:
|
1) |
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2007 (Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara
|
|
|
Kevin J. McNamara |
|
|
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
EX-32.2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION DAVID P. WILLIAMS
PURUSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemed Corporation (Company), does hereby certify that:
|
1) |
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2007 (Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David P. Williams
|
|
|
David P. Williams |
|
|
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
EX-32.3
EXHIBIT 32.3
CERTIFICATION BY ARTHUR V. TUCKER, JR.
PURUSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Vice President
and Controller of Chemed Corporation (Company), does hereby certify that:
|
1) |
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2007 (Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Dated: February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
|
|
|
Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. |
|
|
(Vice President and Controller) |
|
|